General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

"Terrorism" predictions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2007, 05:36 PM
  #81  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

clown

did you not look at those pictures and all the debris ------ all over?

a guy you talked to on IRC. wow thats great. another dumbass CT fairy

someone ------ that debris everywhere right, cai, fbi, maybe the illuminati...

Originally Posted by stevenb
Considering there were probably 10-12 other surveillance systems pointed in the general direction of the pentagon..
hmm did you just make that up? yea you did. PROBABLY. you're PROBABLY mentally handicap

Originally Posted by random-strike
http://www.amazon.com/Covering-Catas.../dp/156625180X
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:44 PM
  #82  
1.0 BAR
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by random-strike
clown

did you not look at those pictures and all the debris ------ all over?

a guy you talked to on IRC. wow thats great. another dumbass CT fairy

someone ------ that debris everywhere right, cai, fbi, maybe the illuminati...

hmm did you just make that up? yea you did. PROBABLY. you're PROBABLY mentally handicap

http://www.amazon.com/Covering-Catas.../dp/156625180X
Uh, lol. The news interviewed a few people that worked in surround businesses that all admitted that the CIA had confiscated their surveillance videos.

And a person that I had attended defcon and a few other conferences with / known for close to 10 years is a believable source for me.

Don't think that because you brow beat people they will end up believing what you force feed them jackass.

And furthermore did you read the part where I said.... do I believe a plane flew into the pentagon.. yes.

Learn how to read and comprehend before you go making allegations that are ------- retarded.
stevenb is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:48 PM
  #83  
1.0 BAR
 
AWDstylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by random-strike
[img width=800]https://www.homemadeturbo.com/jbliss/plane2.jpg[/img]
lol

That's awsome. So from that enormous plane, that's all that's left? hahaha Where did the rest of it go?

Examples of what REAL commecial airline crashes look like:


















Notice that these ACTUAL airline crash sites contant the entire aircraft because there is nothing aboard the aircraft that burns hot enough to make the entire thing disappear. That pile of scrap painted scrap aluminum you posted is a joke.
AWDstylez is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:53 PM
  #84  
1.0 BAR
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by AWDstylez
lol

That's awsome. So from that enormous plane, that's all that's left? hahaha Where did the rest of it go?

Examples of what REAL commecial airline crashes look like:

Notice that these ACTUAL airline crash sites contant the entire aircraft because there is nothing aboard the aircraft that burns hot enough to make the entire thing disappear. That pile of scrap painted scrap aluminum you posted is a joke.

In all reality, you cannot compare ground crashes like that... with a building crash. Especially a building crash that involves reinforced concrete walls.

I do wonder where the engines went... cause they are close to 7 tons of titanium.. they should have at least hit the side of the pentagon in close proximity to the body of the plane. Even if the plane contacted the ground and then "skipped" into the pentagon... I feel that they would still have bounced along next to it and hit the pentagon.. unless maybe they bounced over it?
stevenb is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:54 PM
  #85  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

children shouldn't be allowed on HMT

those planes where not going 500mph into a ------- reinforced concrete building made to withstand bomb/missle attacks.

you're grasping at straws now, just admit you hate the united states and no matter what happens will you always take the side against it.

where did all the ---- go in the plane that crashed in penns? ohh wait that one didn't crash either

and i quote again child
Originally Posted by random-strike
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:56 PM
  #86  
1.0 BAR
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by random-strike
children shouldn't be allowed on HMT

those planes where not going 500mph into a ------- reinforced concrete building made to withstand bomb/missle attacks.

you're grasping at straws now, just admit you hate the united states and no matter what happens will you always take the side against it.

where did all the ---- go in the plane that crashed in penns? ohh wait that one didn't crash either

and i quote again child
I thought the plane's approach speed was estimated to be slower than it's cruising speed. Witnesses on site said that the plane banked and then flew into the pentagon coming out of the banking maneuver. At that low... and that speed he wouldn't have really been able to make that bank... lots of aircraft pilots have stated it's a pretty one shot in hell chance he made it. I guess it could be done.. but I don't know about the approach speed being 500mph.
stevenb is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:59 PM
  #87  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.



J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 06:01 PM
  #88  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 06:01 PM
  #89  
1.0 BAR
 
AWDstylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by stevenb

In all reality, you cannot compare ground crashes like that... with a building crash. Especially a building crash that involves reinforced concrete walls.

I do wonder where the engines went... cause they are close to 7 tons of titanium.. they should have at least hit the side of the pentagon in close proximity to the body of the plane. Even if the plane contacted the ground and then "skipped" into the pentagon... I feel that they would still have bounced along next to it and hit the pentagon.. unless maybe they bounced over it?
You absolutely can compare them. What happens when a plane hits a building? Things disappear? The bottom line is you're dealing with steal and titanium that don't just randomly disappear regardless of what they hit. If there isn't an entire 757 worth of metal at that crash scene (and there isn't), then a 757 was never there.


Originally Posted by random-strike
children shouldn't be allowed on HMT

those planes where not going 500mph into a ------- reinforced concrete building made to withstand bomb/missle attacks.
where did all the ---- go in the plane that crashed in penns? ohh wait that one didn't crash either
Ironically the Flight 93 crash sit also has no wreckage.

I will also ask you, what happens when the plane hits the building? It just disappears? I don't care how fast it hit the building, there is any entire aircraft worth of metal at the crash site or there isn't. Three scraps of metal totalling 20lbs would not suffice for an investigation in any other airline crash. The metal has to go SOMEWHERE. Where did it go?
AWDstylez is offline  
Old 09-14-2007, 06:02 PM
  #90  
1.0 BAR
 
stevenb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by random-strike



That still doesn't show where the engines impacted the walls...

The engines are pretty far away from the fuselage of a 757...



I'd imagine it'd be something like.... i | i Which would leave damage in three areas on the pentagon wall.
stevenb is offline  


Quick Reply: "Terrorism" predictions.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.