"Terrorism" predictions.
09-16-2007, 09:36 PM
#161
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
disgusting one world ****!
F the UN and F everyone but the US
F the UN and F everyone but the US
09-16-2007, 09:44 PM
#162
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/27/inv.suspects/
you're a clown.
my theory is not wrong. a plane hit the pentagon. if you deny that you are dillusional.
you haven't proved ONE thing in this debate. NOTHING. not one thing. you cannot prove your theory, because IT IS NOT TRUE. its not even close to being true. its so far off in outerspace no one ever will take you seriously.
i just posted pictures taken literally 30 seconds after the plane hit, showing american airlines debris everywhere, photos taken by citizens. these photos were not seized.
don't you think all the fruity *** ******* that make these stupid claims, and if they were true they would dissapear and be killed? if you believe these theories the government has already killed thousands of citizens, why would they stop at some stupid *** kid.
you have absolutely nothing backing your theory, there isn't one single thing. except what you THINK should happen when a plane hits a concerte building.
you're a clown.
my theory is not wrong. a plane hit the pentagon. if you deny that you are dillusional.
you haven't proved ONE thing in this debate. NOTHING. not one thing. you cannot prove your theory, because IT IS NOT TRUE. its not even close to being true. its so far off in outerspace no one ever will take you seriously.
i just posted pictures taken literally 30 seconds after the plane hit, showing american airlines debris everywhere, photos taken by citizens. these photos were not seized.
don't you think all the fruity *** ******* that make these stupid claims, and if they were true they would dissapear and be killed? if you believe these theories the government has already killed thousands of citizens, why would they stop at some stupid *** kid.
you have absolutely nothing backing your theory, there isn't one single thing. except what you THINK should happen when a plane hits a concerte building.
So making the people who make these claims disappear is going to make this better? That will further solidify the fact that someone was right and will only strengthen their argument... that something fishy was going on.
Where are the rest of the video cameras? You asked how I knew there were other videos.. it was on the news shortly after the pentagon was hit.. (I was watching the news as they interviewed the gas station employees, and then later the sheraton hotel security officers... who said.. "We don't know why they took the surveillance videos.. but they did." http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...e/footage.html
Why would they take these videos, and deny all requests under the freedom of information act to see them? Why are the American people still only able to view the 5 frames of video that they released?
The twin tower's attack was genuine.. there is lots of private party video of what happened.. (I'm not going to argue the idea that they were destroyed by the government.. because to me, that didn't look like the fact.)... but... there are tons of people in the vicinity of the pentagon on a daily basis... I'd imagine hundreds.. and not one of them video taped the plane on approach? I don't know if you have much experience with jet liners.. but they make quite a ------- commotion when they're coming in.. even at 2-300mph.. they can still be heard for quite a distance.. and seen... so why aren't there more pictures of the 757 (which is ------- huge)... coming in to hit the pentagon? Why wasn't it shot down by the CIA and other government acronyms that are posted on the rooftops with ground to air missiles?
Most of all.. why have we only seen the 5 frames of video evidence.. when there are other videos out there?
09-16-2007, 09:46 PM
#163
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
This should about cover it.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/cfr-members.htm
If someone really starts thinking about it, we allow the UN to tell us what our military should do, the federal reserve (privately owned by banks) to print our money and control inflation while eating income taxes as interest, and numerous other "government" agencies that get to have input and influence on what we do, none of them elected by our people, or held accountable for thier actions by our people. We have an FBI for investigations, a CIA to hold the information, and when all that doesn't work we create homeland security, who tells the TSA what to do.....and on and on. Nobody should fear anything, because it's hard to track down just who's in charge.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/cfr-members.htm
If someone really starts thinking about it, we allow the UN to tell us what our military should do, the federal reserve (privately owned by banks) to print our money and control inflation while eating income taxes as interest, and numerous other "government" agencies that get to have input and influence on what we do, none of them elected by our people, or held accountable for thier actions by our people. We have an FBI for investigations, a CIA to hold the information, and when all that doesn't work we create homeland security, who tells the TSA what to do.....and on and on. Nobody should fear anything, because it's hard to track down just who's in charge.
09-16-2007, 10:04 PM
#164
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by stevenb
Are you kidding? Shut your ------- mouth and read what I've said in the debate. I'm not debating on whether or not a plane or missile or ------- flock of negros hit the pentagon. I'm arguing exactly what kind of plane hit the pentagon, and why there isn't more collateral damage to the building.... despite the fact that a few ton airplane just slammed into it going 2-300 mph.
So making the people who make these claims disappear is going to make this better? That will further solidify the fact that someone was right and will only strengthen their argument... that something fishy was going on.
Where are the rest of the video cameras? You asked how I knew there were other videos.. it was on the news shortly after the pentagon was hit.. (I was watching the news as they interviewed the gas station employees, and then later the sheraton hotel security officers... who said.. "We don't know why they took the surveillance videos.. but they did." http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...e/footage.html
Why would they take these videos, and deny all requests under the freedom of information act to see them? Why are the American people still only able to view the 5 frames of video that they released?
The twin tower's attack was genuine.. there is lots of private party video of what happened.. (I'm not going to argue the idea that they were destroyed by the government.. because to me, that didn't look like the fact.)... but... there are tons of people in the vicinity of the pentagon on a daily basis... I'd imagine hundreds.. and not one of them video taped the plane on approach? I don't know if you have much experience with jet liners.. but they make quite a ------- commotion when they're coming in.. even at 2-300mph.. they can still be heard for quite a distance.. and seen... so why aren't there more pictures of the 757 (which is ------- huge)... coming in to hit the pentagon? Why wasn't it shot down by the CIA and other government acronyms that are posted on the rooftops with ground to air missiles?
Most of all.. why have we only seen the 5 frames of video evidence.. when there are other videos out there?
So making the people who make these claims disappear is going to make this better? That will further solidify the fact that someone was right and will only strengthen their argument... that something fishy was going on.
Where are the rest of the video cameras? You asked how I knew there were other videos.. it was on the news shortly after the pentagon was hit.. (I was watching the news as they interviewed the gas station employees, and then later the sheraton hotel security officers... who said.. "We don't know why they took the surveillance videos.. but they did." http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...e/footage.html
Why would they take these videos, and deny all requests under the freedom of information act to see them? Why are the American people still only able to view the 5 frames of video that they released?
The twin tower's attack was genuine.. there is lots of private party video of what happened.. (I'm not going to argue the idea that they were destroyed by the government.. because to me, that didn't look like the fact.)... but... there are tons of people in the vicinity of the pentagon on a daily basis... I'd imagine hundreds.. and not one of them video taped the plane on approach? I don't know if you have much experience with jet liners.. but they make quite a ------- commotion when they're coming in.. even at 2-300mph.. they can still be heard for quite a distance.. and seen... so why aren't there more pictures of the 757 (which is ------- huge)... coming in to hit the pentagon? Why wasn't it shot down by the CIA and other government acronyms that are posted on the rooftops with ground to air missiles?
Most of all.. why have we only seen the 5 frames of video evidence.. when there are other videos out there?
there are thousands of first hand accounts of what happend at the pentagon, i just posted a video of a reporter named mike walters giving an interview about what he saw why don't you call or email him and ask him yourself. or is he a government agent? read the book i posted the link to on amazon, has hundreds of interviews of witnesses to the pentagon attack in it. must all be CAI agents, and the guy who wrote the book was obvously president bush.
you have posted NOTHING, but your dumbass unqualified opinion on what would happen when a plane hits the pentagon, it was build to withstand bomb blasts, missles, and other types of attacks. its many times reinforced concrete.
once again, you have posted NOTHING to back up your idiotic claims.
you are trying to argue what ifs, and why nots, and how comes. i just posted video interviews of normal people, pictures taken by normal people seconds after, showing debris everywhere of an american airlines jet.
id love to see what someone's family would do to you when you say the plane their family member was on didn't crash into the pentagon.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/pentagon.olson/
09-16-2007, 10:10 PM
#165
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
neeeaarrrr neeeerrr rrrnaw neeeerrrr
you =
http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer_5965.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk
http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer...6_Videos.shtml
you =
May 16, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains two videos from the DOD, and posts them on their website. The site is down for about half of the day due to demand.
September 15, 2006: Judicial Watch announces the release of video from CITGO gas station. 3 The video consists mostly of views of the interior of the gas station and does not appear to capture the attack.
December 2, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains a video recording from the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington. The video, which does not include a view of the Pentagon's facade, shows an explosion but does not capture an approaching jetliner. 4
September 15, 2006: Judicial Watch announces the release of video from CITGO gas station. 3 The video consists mostly of views of the interior of the gas station and does not appear to capture the attack.
December 2, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains a video recording from the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington. The video, which does not include a view of the Pentagon's facade, shows an explosion but does not capture an approaching jetliner. 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk
http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer...6_Videos.shtml
09-16-2007, 11:19 PM
#166
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
was something supposed to happen a couple days ago?
09-16-2007, 11:41 PM
#167
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
well?
Originally Posted by CoreyR
first off johnny, im 23. your 24. a whol year older, only im about 10 years older mentally.
second that ------- video of the plane hitting the wall. read the description of it. it states that that wall is MUUUUUCH stronger than the pentagon and designed to take impact without getting destroyed. and that plane was going 500 ------- miles an hour.
the supposed 757 that hit the pentagon was going at best what 250-300? now explain to me how (because you cant keep your story straight) that it vaporized on contact, yet theres some remains (you claim) that are pretty much un-identifiable (they LOOK like the might be part of a plane,maybe) but yet if the plane vaporized how the ---- did it make it all the way through the building? i mean it should have vaporized on contact because if it did, how the ---- did it go through what 4-5 layers of bulding?
and about these videos? where are the rest? why wont they be shown? the got a request to be viewed yet it was denied. why would they deny something like that if there really wasnt anything secret to be seen? i guess the just dont feel like it right? if you think there was only 3 videos, all of which are so blurry you couldnt tell whether a plane or a flying whale hit, then your a ------- retard. that place probably has 30 cameras watching it at all times.
keep trying johnny, the only one your convincing is youself.
second that ------- video of the plane hitting the wall. read the description of it. it states that that wall is MUUUUUCH stronger than the pentagon and designed to take impact without getting destroyed. and that plane was going 500 ------- miles an hour.
the supposed 757 that hit the pentagon was going at best what 250-300? now explain to me how (because you cant keep your story straight) that it vaporized on contact, yet theres some remains (you claim) that are pretty much un-identifiable (they LOOK like the might be part of a plane,maybe) but yet if the plane vaporized how the ---- did it make it all the way through the building? i mean it should have vaporized on contact because if it did, how the ---- did it go through what 4-5 layers of bulding?
and about these videos? where are the rest? why wont they be shown? the got a request to be viewed yet it was denied. why would they deny something like that if there really wasnt anything secret to be seen? i guess the just dont feel like it right? if you think there was only 3 videos, all of which are so blurry you couldnt tell whether a plane or a flying whale hit, then your a ------- retard. that place probably has 30 cameras watching it at all times.
keep trying johnny, the only one your convincing is youself.
09-16-2007, 11:57 PM
#169
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by signorelli21
I think you missed this post Jonny. Just want to clarify what the governments official statement is on the plane doing a 360 for over a minute next to the pentagon at low altitiude (flight data recorded) and why you think the government hack who signed his name to the final report won't answer questions as to why the data is inconsistant with what they say happened. No, it's all good though. Maybe they're just democrat pilots with time on thier hands.
09-17-2007, 12:23 AM
#170
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
I think you missed this post Jonny. Just want to clarify what the governments official statement is on the plane doing a 360 for over a minute next to the pentagon at low altitiude (flight data recorded) and why you think the government hack who signed his name to the final report won't answer questions as to why the data is inconsistant with what they say happened. No, it's all good though. Maybe they're just democrat pilots with time on thier hands.
some CTs say why are the polls still up wouldn't a plane knock them over?
some CTs say why are the polls down the plane was too high?
maybe you all CTers should get on the same page and agree on one theory.
you totally convined me, the canadian on the phone really stuck it to that fruity *** liberal at the NTSB. im definatly convinced that plane didn't hit the pentagon, but i'd really like to know where all those people dissapeared too.
