"Terrorism" predictions.
09-14-2007, 04:09 AM
#71
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
This is in direct response to the Pentagon conspiracy theory that was on the front page, to show that it is indeed likely that a plane hitting a concrete wall at high speed would be disintegrated leaving little damage (relatively speaking).
09-14-2007, 04:17 AM
#72
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
another lessons for today kids?
09-14-2007, 04:19 AM
#73
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by CoreyR
johnny you keep posting pictures of a blown up pentagon, but im still failing to see ANY remains of a 250,000 pound 44 foot tall, 124 foot wide, 155 foot long boeing 757.
as i stated before jet fuel burns at 1500* and aluminum boils at 2400, titanium at 3200. so there goes the "vaporized" theory because jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to do so. so where are the engines? wings? tail? anything?
as i stated before jet fuel burns at 1500* and aluminum boils at 2400, titanium at 3200. so there goes the "vaporized" theory because jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to do so. so where are the engines? wings? tail? anything?
i guess since when i shoot a peice of metal with my 06 and the bullet disinigrates, you would claim a bullet did not hit the metal.
you have to be a complete and utter fool to believe a plane did not hit the pentagon. you would get outwitted by a retarded fly
09-14-2007, 10:09 AM
#77
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,588
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by CoreyR
johnny you keep posting pictures of a blown up pentagon, but im still failing to see ANY remains of a 250,000 pound 44 foot tall, 124 foot wide, 155 foot long boeing 757.
as i stated before jet fuel burns at 1500* and aluminum boils at 2400, titanium at 3200. so there goes the "vaporized" theory because jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to do so. so where are the engines? wings? tail? anything?
as i stated before jet fuel burns at 1500* and aluminum boils at 2400, titanium at 3200. so there goes the "vaporized" theory because jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to do so. so where are the engines? wings? tail? anything?
it's sad that a sight based on people using thier brain to accomplish things themselves can be full of people that can't think.
I didn't read the thread, just saw that comment.
09-14-2007, 11:14 AM
#78
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
buk you realize the pentagon was not a normal building. it was designed to survive bombings, both from the air and on the ground.
why are you trying to compare it to apartment buildings lol
thats quite a stretch. CT = for losers
why are you trying to compare it to apartment buildings lol
thats quite a stretch. CT = for losers
09-14-2007, 04:32 PM
#79
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Today's the day, so far so good
09-14-2007, 05:17 PM
#80
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
I don't know what hit the pentagon.
The three frames of video evidence show a blur hitting it.
Considering there were probably 10-12 other surveillance systems pointed in the general direction of the pentagon.. and they were all snatched up within minutes... of the explosion / collision it seems fishy that someone is hiding something. Given 6 years of people saying something else hit the pentagon.. they are perpetuating this conspiracy theory by not releasing the other video... and instead 3 frames of video.
One of the people I used to talk to on IRC was there the day that happened at the pentagon. He said it didn't look like a 757, or any other plane he'd seen. (credible evidence? All the whacked out conservatives will say nay, but eh... who gives a ----)
Do I believe a missile hit the pentagon... not really. Do I believe a 747 or 757 hit the pentagon... eh... not really. Do I believe a plane of some sorts hit the pentagon... yeah.
The three frames of video evidence show a blur hitting it.
Considering there were probably 10-12 other surveillance systems pointed in the general direction of the pentagon.. and they were all snatched up within minutes... of the explosion / collision it seems fishy that someone is hiding something. Given 6 years of people saying something else hit the pentagon.. they are perpetuating this conspiracy theory by not releasing the other video... and instead 3 frames of video.
One of the people I used to talk to on IRC was there the day that happened at the pentagon. He said it didn't look like a 757, or any other plane he'd seen. (credible evidence? All the whacked out conservatives will say nay, but eh... who gives a ----)
Do I believe a missile hit the pentagon... not really. Do I believe a 747 or 757 hit the pentagon... eh... not really. Do I believe a plane of some sorts hit the pentagon... yeah.
