General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

"Terrorism" predictions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2007, 01:00 AM
  #171  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

i'm very impressed on how fast bush and cheney were able to plant those telephone polls after the attack, and that no one noticed them doing so.

really quite amazing. no plane hit the pentagon!











J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 09:10 AM
  #172  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Next time I'll try to get all the "CTers" on the same page, definately a requirement in your head in order to get the government to answer legit questions. Nice divert.
MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 12:16 PM
  #173  
1.0 BAR
 
AWDstylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by stevenb
You remind me of a few people that I had debate class with in highschool and college.

When people prove your theory is wrong, or start proving your theory is wrong you resort to changing the dynamics of the conversation to something else that's a hot spot within that debate.

After a while the original debate disappears and it appears as though you win the debate about what noone remembers you were arguing about.

It's rather comical to watch people with little minds such as yourself use this tactic. Then continue avoiding questions that will further compromise your views.

Grow up a little then join the political debates.
By far the best post in this debate and also the most true. I've been laughing at the way he avoids issues like the plague. There's a laundry list of points in the last topic that he has yet to address, but they're now lost to the world after multiple pages of being ignored and substituted with, "YOU CAN'T MAKE ME LIKE *******!!"

His other "argument" strategy is equally laughable and even more obvious, witnessed here:



Originally Posted by random-strike
Open with an insult.

Originally Posted by random-strike
my theory is not wrong. a plane hit the pentagon. if you deny that you are dillusional.
Let everyone know (again) that you're right. Be sure to point out that you would have to be crazy to think otherwise.


Originally Posted by random-strike
you haven't proved ONE thing in this debate. NOTHING. not one thing. you cannot prove your theory, because IT IS NOT TRUE. its not even close to being true. its so far off in outerspace no one ever will take you seriously.
Ignore all arguments and the insurmountable pile of evidence and once again state that the other side is wrong. The more times you restate it, the more true it becomes. Don't forget to reaffirm the fact that agreeing with the other side makes you a crazy person.


Originally Posted by random-strike
i just posted pictures taken literally 30 seconds after the plane hit, showing american airlines debris everywhere, photos taken by citizens. these photos were not seized.
Remind people of already refuted claims as if they have not been refuted.

Originally Posted by random-strike
don't you think all the fruity *** ******* that make these stupid claims, and if they were true they would dissapear and be killed? if you believe these theories the government has already killed thousands of citizens, why would they stop at some stupid *** kid.
Continue to berate the other side. This will prove how right you are.

Originally Posted by random-strike
you have absolutely nothing backing your theory, there isn't one single thing. except what you THINK should happen when a plane hits a concerte building.
Ignore previously mentioned points and insurmountable evidence pile and state that no backup has been provided by the other side. Again, if you say something enough times people might start to take it as truth.


Summary:

You have now successfully argued your point. You have proved yourself right beyond even any shread of doubt (at least in your own mind) and the opposition is completely crushed. All without ever presenting a speck of evidence to support your ideas or getting into the messy and possibly fatal affair of addressing even one of the opposition's arguments. Congratuations. I will now call you MIMS...

"I'm hot cuz I'm fly, you ain't cuz you not."

Circular arguments FTW. Your Engrish is on par with his as well.
AWDstylez is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 12:41 PM
  #174  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

photos are video are not proof anymore. crackpot theories by life long losers in highschool asking their mom for lunch money... how could anyone argue against that?
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 12:53 PM
  #175  
1.0 BAR
 
AWDstylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2461214.ece

Government, you lied to me! Not possible! WMD'S! Nukes! Biological weapons! Chemical weapons! Aluminum tubes! Saddam will kills us all! We need to protect ourselves! Liberation for the people! Freedom! Patriotism! Oh my!!
AWDstylez is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 12:57 PM
  #176  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by AWDstylez
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2461214.ece

Government, you lied to me! Not possible! WMD'S! Nukes! Biological weapons! Chemical weapons! Aluminum tubes! Saddam will kills us all! We need to protect ourselves! Liberation for the people! Freedom! Patriotism! Oh my!!
the entire world was wrong, they didn't lie.

all of europe, middle east, the US. they all thought this.

now its a world wide conspiracy!

and, to be entirely fair, they did find chemical weapons there
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 01:08 PM
  #177  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

liberals are lying to you. go read what greenspan said to clearify that statement he made in his memoirs

J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 01:11 PM
  #178  
0.0 BAR
 
Tom-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by random-strike
photos are video are not proof anymore. crackpot theories by life long losers in highschool asking their mom for lunch money... how could anyone argue against that?
And you've had your first real job for... what, five months now?

Lotsa better ---- to crack on these kids for, Johnny. Some of them are flagrant DSM-owners! You've been letting us down.
Tom-Guy is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 07:47 PM
  #179  
3.0 BAR
 
Racintweek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,877
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by random-strike
the entire world was wrong, they didn't lie.

all of europe, middle east, the US. they all thought this.

now its a world wide conspiracy!

and, to be entirely fair, they did find chemical weapons there

like was metioned earlier the fed reserve is made up of european banks, when we borrow money to go to war we get it from them. they make money on the interest(liek all other banks) it is in thier best interest to have money borrowed form them


to be even more fair why is iraq and afgahnistan the only places we have gone to when we know other countries have chemical, nuclear and biological weapons
Racintweek is offline  
Old 09-17-2007, 08:20 PM
  #180  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: "Terrorism" predictions.

Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
And you've had your first real job for... what, five months now?

Lotsa better ---- to crack on these kids for, Johnny. Some of them are flagrant DSM-owners! You've been letting us down.
um no ive been working as a software engineer for almost 3 years. before that i worked in software but in a test role, and before that i worked manual labor

but five months ago i started making lots of money
J-SMITH69 is offline  


Quick Reply: "Terrorism" predictions.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM.