"Terrorism" predictions.
09-14-2007, 07:21 PM
#111
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Jonny blew up the world trade. 
09-14-2007, 07:27 PM
#112
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
ive posted enough proof in this thread.
your arguement is stupid, because there are pictures taken by private citizens literally seconds after the plane crashed showing debris everywhere from a ------- american airlanes plane.
your arguement is stupid, because there are pictures taken by private citizens literally seconds after the plane crashed showing debris everywhere from a ------- american airlanes plane.
Originally Posted by random-strike
the bodies were found inside the wreckage of the pentagon.
why do you keep saying they went through the building. part of the building was destoryed...
why do you keep saying they went through the building. part of the building was destoryed...
Originally Posted by random-strike
you dont know if there are even anymore tapes in existence.
you dont even know... you say 10+. thats a number you pulled out of your ***.
you dont even know... you say 10+. thats a number you pulled out of your ***.
Originally Posted by random-strike
just admit you hate the US and no matter what happens you will blame it.
the tapes were taken to use as evidence. that is pretty obvious don't you think
the tapes were taken to use as evidence. that is pretty obvious don't you think
Evidence of what? For what trial? To prove what? Why won't they release them?
[/quote]
09-14-2007, 08:05 PM
#113
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
do you believe a american airlines 757 plane hit the pentagon.
those pictures are taken literally seconds after the plane hit. there is peices of it everywhere, clearly identifiable as an american airlines plane.
are you suggesting the illuminati came in the 30 seconds before the pictures where taken and scattered debris of a previous american airlines 757 jet around? and no one saw them ------ing it?
you seriously have to be mentally retarded to buy into this conspiracy theory. which has absolutely NO footing at all.
once again, nail in the coffin, private citizens pictures taken seconds after plane hit, showing debris of a american airlines jet scattered everywhere. how can you deny it happend?
those pictures are taken literally seconds after the plane hit. there is peices of it everywhere, clearly identifiable as an american airlines plane.
are you suggesting the illuminati came in the 30 seconds before the pictures where taken and scattered debris of a previous american airlines 757 jet around? and no one saw them ------ing it?
you seriously have to be mentally retarded to buy into this conspiracy theory. which has absolutely NO footing at all.
once again, nail in the coffin, private citizens pictures taken seconds after plane hit, showing debris of a american airlines jet scattered everywhere. how can you deny it happend?
09-14-2007, 08:37 PM
#114
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
buk you realize the pentagon was not a normal building. it was designed to survive bombings, both from the air and on the ground.
why are you trying to compare it to apartment buildings lol
thats quite a stretch. CT = for losers
why are you trying to compare it to apartment buildings lol
thats quite a stretch. CT = for losers
my post proves that a plane hit the pentagon.. a plane hit an APARTMENT building and theres no pieces in that wreckage that are too big to be carried out.. now take that vs the pentagon where the plane was travelling at full speed (the israeli plane wasnt cause it had engines falling off.. lol) and the strength of the pentagon which is prrolly blast reinforced concrete or w/e and the pictures are proof that a plane CAN disintegrate
09-14-2007, 08:39 PM
#115
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Johnny he's only 16. He probably still believes in Santa Claus too.
09-14-2007, 08:44 PM
#116
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
reposting cause i can...
again im not a conspiracy theorist.. because the stories are too ------- farfetched
this is proof that a plane can disintegrate
you cant compare a plane crashing into the ground to a plane crashing into a concrete wall :1 planes that hit the ground leave wreckage.. a plane that hits a wall WILL Disintegrate
thttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijlmer_disaster
again im not a conspiracy theorist.. because the stories are too ------- farfetched
this is proof that a plane can disintegrateyou cant compare a plane crashing into the ground to a plane crashing into a concrete wall :1 planes that hit the ground leave wreckage.. a plane that hits a wall WILL Disintegrate
thttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijlmer_disaster
09-14-2007, 08:49 PM
#117
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
The plane wasn't traveling at 2,000+ mph and it has just a little bit more mass and complex, impact absorbing structure than a solid bullet that weights a couple grams.
For the third time I ask you, what about the bodies?
For the third time I ask you, what about the bodies?
it was going 500mph says right in the video.. do you even bother listening to facts or do you just make up your own? 
09-14-2007, 11:19 PM
#118
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
first off johnny, im 23. your 24. a whol year older, only im about 10 years older mentally.
second that ------- video of the plane hitting the wall. read the description of it. it states that that wall is MUUUUUCH stronger than the pentagon and designed to take impact without getting destroyed. and that plane was going 500 ------- miles an hour.
the supposed 757 that hit the pentagon was going at best what 250-300? now explain to me how (because you cant keep your story straight) that it vaporized on contact, yet theres some remains (you claim) that are pretty much un-identifiable (they LOOK like the might be part of a plane,maybe) but yet if the plane vaporized how the ---- did it make it all the way through the building? i mean it should have vaporized on contact because if it did, how the ---- did it go through what 4-5 layers of bulding?
and about these videos? where are the rest? why wont they be shown? the got a request to be viewed yet it was denied. why would they deny something like that if there really wasnt anything secret to be seen? i guess the just dont feel like it right? if you think there was only 3 videos, all of which are so blurry you couldnt tell whether a plane or a flying whale hit, then your a ------- retard. that place probably has 30 cameras watching it at all times.
keep trying johnny, the only one your convincing is youself.
second that ------- video of the plane hitting the wall. read the description of it. it states that that wall is MUUUUUCH stronger than the pentagon and designed to take impact without getting destroyed. and that plane was going 500 ------- miles an hour.
the supposed 757 that hit the pentagon was going at best what 250-300? now explain to me how (because you cant keep your story straight) that it vaporized on contact, yet theres some remains (you claim) that are pretty much un-identifiable (they LOOK like the might be part of a plane,maybe) but yet if the plane vaporized how the ---- did it make it all the way through the building? i mean it should have vaporized on contact because if it did, how the ---- did it go through what 4-5 layers of bulding?
and about these videos? where are the rest? why wont they be shown? the got a request to be viewed yet it was denied. why would they deny something like that if there really wasnt anything secret to be seen? i guess the just dont feel like it right? if you think there was only 3 videos, all of which are so blurry you couldnt tell whether a plane or a flying whale hit, then your a ------- retard. that place probably has 30 cameras watching it at all times.
keep trying johnny, the only one your convincing is youself.
09-14-2007, 11:23 PM
#119
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by buk9tp
the plane in the video wasnt going 2000mph it was going 500mph says right in the video.. do you even bother listening to facts or do you just make up your own?
it was going 500mph says right in the video.. do you even bother listening to facts or do you just make up your own?
09-14-2007, 11:38 PM
#120
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 828
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzR-q0ijbV0
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html
the pictures of the crash in ansterdam is slightly misleading because the plane hit the building in a 90 degree bank which is why the impact hole of the building is not horizontal.
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/bra.../pentagon.html
I'm not as interested in what actually hit the pentagon as i am curious as to why it was hit in the first place, and that that particular section was being renovated to be blast resistant, don't you think the evil terrorists would have included this type of research in their 2 years of planning?
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html
the pictures of the crash in ansterdam is slightly misleading because the plane hit the building in a 90 degree bank which is why the impact hole of the building is not horizontal.
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/bra.../pentagon.html
I'm not as interested in what actually hit the pentagon as i am curious as to why it was hit in the first place, and that that particular section was being renovated to be blast resistant, don't you think the evil terrorists would have included this type of research in their 2 years of planning?
