"Terrorism" predictions.
09-14-2007, 06:02 PM
#91
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
IT VAPORIZED DUMB ---- DID YOU NOT WATCH THIS VIDEO? WHAT HAPPEN TO THIS PLANE? WAS IT A ------- MAGIC TRICK?
http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos/plane_vs_wall.html
http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos/plane_vs_wall.html
09-14-2007, 06:04 PM
#92
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by stevenb
That still doesn't show where the engines impacted the walls...
The engines are pretty far away from the fuselage of a 757...
I'd imagine it'd be something like.... i | i Which would leave damage in three areas on the pentagon wall.
WATCH THE VIDEO THE ENTIRE WAY THROUGH DUMBASS
he said the wings caved in up against the plane and exploded. THE FUEL IS IN THE WINGS ON THE ------- PLANE. IT ------- BLEW UP. THE ENGINES ARE SITTING ON THE DAMN WINGS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycPUDktZpCU
09-14-2007, 06:05 PM
#93
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
IT VAPORIZED DUMB ---- DID YOU NOT WATCH THIS VIDEO? WHAT HAPPEN TO THIS PLANE? WAS IT A ------- MAGIC TRICK?
http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos/plane_vs_wall.html
http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos/plane_vs_wall.html
That doesn't account for the lack of wing / engine damage to the sides of the fuselage entry point.
09-14-2007, 06:05 PM
#94
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by stevenb
I thought the plane's approach speed was estimated to be slower than it's cruising speed. Witnesses on site said that the plane banked and then flew into the pentagon coming out of the banking maneuver. At that low... and that speed he wouldn't have really been able to make that bank... lots of aircraft pilots have stated it's a pretty one shot in hell chance he made it. I guess it could be done.. but I don't know about the approach speed being 500mph.
Originally Posted by random-strike
IT VAPORIZED DUMB ---- DID YOU NOT WATCH THIS VIDEO? WHAT HAPPEN TO THIS PLANE? WAS IT A ------- MAGIC TRICK?
http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos/plane_vs_wall.html
http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos/plane_vs_wall.html
If nothing else, where are the engines? The found ONE high pressure turbine that was 3 feet in diameter TOO SMALL to be from a 757. Where is everything else?
09-14-2007, 06:07 PM
#95
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by stevenb
Even if the plane vaporized (which is possible)...
That doesn't account for the lack of wing / engine damage to the sides of the fuselage entry point.
That doesn't account for the lack of wing / engine damage to the sides of the fuselage entry point.
watch the video dumbass, wings folded into the plane, they are not strong enough to penetrate reinforced concrete.
Originally Posted by random-strike
09-14-2007, 06:08 PM
#96
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
i swear both of you ------- retards have blinders on.
WATCH THE VIDEO THE ENTIRE WAY THROUGH DUMBASS
he said the wings caved in up against the plane and exploded. THE FUEL IS IN THE WINGS ON THE ------- PLANE. IT ------- BLEW UP. THE ENGINES ARE SITTING ON THE DAMN WINGS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycPUDktZpCU
WATCH THE VIDEO THE ENTIRE WAY THROUGH DUMBASS
he said the wings caved in up against the plane and exploded. THE FUEL IS IN THE WINGS ON THE ------- PLANE. IT ------- BLEW UP. THE ENGINES ARE SITTING ON THE DAMN WINGS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycPUDktZpCU
So I'm to take the word of one biased person's opinion of what happened over the word of another person's biased opinion of what happened?
How the ---- can the wings cave in when there is forward motion? If anything it would be / | \ They would break apart from the main fuselage and go outward. Of course they carry the fuel and would explode...but that still doesn't change the fact that 7 tons of spinning titanium attached to gas tanks flying toward a wall... didn't impact the wall... to the sides of the fuselage.
Really... I'm not debating the missing plane.. I'm debating the fact that there isn't more collateral damage to the building... other than the entry point of the fuselage.
09-14-2007, 06:08 PM
#97
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by AWDstylez
The approach speed could have been super-sonic, it doesn't matter. There is not enough energy to vaporize a 757 worth of stainless steal and titanium.
How did it vaporize? How were they able to supposedly identify passengers bodies (human flesh) and yet the plane around them (stainless steel) vaporized? I think you missed the fact that NOTHING IN THE AREA BURNS HOT ENOUGH TO VAPORIZE TITANIUM OR STEEL.
If nothing else, where are the engines? The found ONE high pressure turbine that was 3 feet in diameter TOO SMALL to be from a 757. Where is everything else?
How did it vaporize? How were they able to supposedly identify passengers bodies (human flesh) and yet the plane around them (stainless steel) vaporized? I think you missed the fact that NOTHING IN THE AREA BURNS HOT ENOUGH TO VAPORIZE TITANIUM OR STEEL.
If nothing else, where are the engines? The found ONE high pressure turbine that was 3 feet in diameter TOO SMALL to be from a 757. Where is everything else?
fire did not vaporize the plane that hit the concrete wall in that video. the force of the plane hitting it at that speed is so tremendous that it simple vaporized.
grow up
09-14-2007, 06:08 PM
#98
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 464
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
you are seriously one of the dimmest people ive ever seen
watch the video dumbass, wings folded into the plane, they are not strong enough to penetrate reinforced concrete.
watch the video dumbass, wings folded into the plane, they are not strong enough to penetrate reinforced concrete.
Amazing that they didn't even break a window, didn't scratch the building, didn't even LEAVE A MARK. That's some amazing concrete.
Originally Posted by random-strike
duuuuuummmbbbbbbbb assssssssss
fire did not vaporize the plane that hit the concrete wall in that video. the force of the plane hitting it at that speed is so tremendous that it simple vaporized.
grow up
fire did not vaporize the plane that hit the concrete wall in that video. the force of the plane hitting it at that speed is so tremendous that it simple vaporized.
grow up
Hahahahahhahha You must be joking.
09-14-2007, 06:10 PM
#99
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
you both are really unbelievable. you both have no clue about the world around you.
children.
children.
09-14-2007, 06:11 PM
#100
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
hmmm no damage, nothing eh.
how is that guy biased? there is zero evidence to say he has any kind of agenda, he is just stating what he saw.
how is that guy biased? there is zero evidence to say he has any kind of agenda, he is just stating what he saw.
Originally Posted by random-strike
