"Terrorism" predictions.
09-16-2007, 06:06 PM
#151
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
im not a republican.
i dont like 50% of what GW does. and i dont care about him at all.
question all you want.
you still have to be mentally retarded to believe a plane did not hit the pentagon.
id like to know how the government percisly planted bombs in the towers without the PRIVATLY OWNED tower security, mantience, etc... knowing.
oh and how did the government plant all those peices of american airlines parts all over the pentagon without anyone knowing. since you CAN DRIVE RIGHT UP TO THE ------- PENTAGON
the CAI must be able to freeze time, walk around and plant their stuff, then unfreeze time.
i bet GW invented that technlogy since he is an evil genius, oh wait, was it evil genius or completly dumbass that can't string two words together. hmm i'll turn on mslsd and see what they are saying he is today.
hey, on a good note, at least you guys can get disabled parking permits.
i dont like 50% of what GW does. and i dont care about him at all.
question all you want.
you still have to be mentally retarded to believe a plane did not hit the pentagon.
id like to know how the government percisly planted bombs in the towers without the PRIVATLY OWNED tower security, mantience, etc... knowing.
oh and how did the government plant all those peices of american airlines parts all over the pentagon without anyone knowing. since you CAN DRIVE RIGHT UP TO THE ------- PENTAGON
the CAI must be able to freeze time, walk around and plant their stuff, then unfreeze time.
i bet GW invented that technlogy since he is an evil genius, oh wait, was it evil genius or completly dumbass that can't string two words together. hmm i'll turn on mslsd and see what they are saying he is today.
hey, on a good note, at least you guys can get disabled parking permits.
09-16-2007, 06:42 PM
#152
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
I'm not asking you to accept that a plane didn't hit a damn building, I'm asking you to start thinking for yourself. If news coverage taken at the base of a building has numerous people saying there's explosions going off, you don't write it off as "maybe that's the dee de doh sound buildings that are falling down make", as if the interviews all happened as the buildings were falling.
Now, over the long drawn out day the media isn't to be trusted either, but these were pretty spontanious interviews that were never brought up again. Doesn't that still leave you with questions of why people thought they were hearing explosions from a building that only should have had one explosion (the plane hitting). Can you look at a 45'd pillar and realize it just doesn't break like that, and it's also the same 45 that you'd see after a building implosion?
You don't have to buy the conclusion I'm laying out, but I'd hope that you aren't writing off simple "WTF?" questions that are being pointed out. And please, don't accept the governments answers as a substitute for thinking, because they don't have any answers.
Now, over the long drawn out day the media isn't to be trusted either, but these were pretty spontanious interviews that were never brought up again. Doesn't that still leave you with questions of why people thought they were hearing explosions from a building that only should have had one explosion (the plane hitting). Can you look at a 45'd pillar and realize it just doesn't break like that, and it's also the same 45 that you'd see after a building implosion?
You don't have to buy the conclusion I'm laying out, but I'd hope that you aren't writing off simple "WTF?" questions that are being pointed out. And please, don't accept the governments answers as a substitute for thinking, because they don't have any answers.
09-16-2007, 08:18 PM
#153
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
I'm not asking you to accept that a plane didn't hit a damn building, I'm asking you to start thinking for yourself. If news coverage taken at the base of a building has numerous people saying there's explosions going off, you don't write it off as "maybe that's the dee de doh sound buildings that are falling down make", as if the interviews all happened as the buildings were falling.
Now, over the long drawn out day the media isn't to be trusted either, but these were pretty spontanious interviews that were never brought up again. Doesn't that still leave you with questions of why people thought they were hearing explosions from a building that only should have had one explosion (the plane hitting). Can you look at a 45'd pillar and realize it just doesn't break like that, and it's also the same 45 that you'd see after a building implosion?
You don't have to buy the conclusion I'm laying out, but I'd hope that you aren't writing off simple "WTF?" questions that are being pointed out. And please, don't accept the governments answers as a substitute for thinking, because they don't have any answers.
Now, over the long drawn out day the media isn't to be trusted either, but these were pretty spontanious interviews that were never brought up again. Doesn't that still leave you with questions of why people thought they were hearing explosions from a building that only should have had one explosion (the plane hitting). Can you look at a 45'd pillar and realize it just doesn't break like that, and it's also the same 45 that you'd see after a building implosion?
You don't have to buy the conclusion I'm laying out, but I'd hope that you aren't writing off simple "WTF?" questions that are being pointed out. And please, don't accept the governments answers as a substitute for thinking, because they don't have any answers.
im not blindly believing the government.
how do you know it doesn't break like that? are you a ------- expert on how skysscrapers break after jetliners hit them then they collapse on themselves?
the government can't keep a breaking into a hotel secret, they can't keep the president getting a BJ in the oval office a secret, what in the world makes you think this could ever be a huge government wide conspiracy.
its truely idiotic to think anything like that could be pulled off.
09-16-2007, 08:33 PM
#154
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,877
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
proof they were found alive? another crackpot CT dumbass theory
there is only one case where someone who was an US citizen got searched without a warrent, and he was missidentified... they thought he was someone else... a non us citizen. and he got TWO MILLION DOLLARS in settlement.
people recieve settlements to keep thier mouth shut and to keep them from pressing charges. if they did nothing illegal or un constitutional they wouldnt have paid him
09-16-2007, 08:41 PM
#155
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
man you are right, now i'm a believer that evil genius bush really did plan all this out! i can't believe you figure it all out man!
the next time someone says bush is stupid im going to correct them, hell no ***** da bush planned the atackkkzzzz
the next time someone says bush is stupid im going to correct them, hell no ***** da bush planned the atackkkzzzz
FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.
09-16-2007, 08:50 PM
#156
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Bush could never pull all of this off himself /simple logic.
Our government isn't run by the President anyway. He acts in the interests of others, and it's not your everyday citizen. Once we all stop thinking that criticizing the government means criticizing our country, I think we'll all start seeing the light. This is the same government that makes you pay taxes on your labor, your goods, and everything else you own, and then taxes it all over again when you die. Really, it's fucked.
Our government isn't run by the President anyway. He acts in the interests of others, and it's not your everyday citizen. Once we all stop thinking that criticizing the government means criticizing our country, I think we'll all start seeing the light. This is the same government that makes you pay taxes on your labor, your goods, and everything else you own, and then taxes it all over again when you die. Really, it's fucked.
09-16-2007, 08:51 PM
#157
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by random-strike
man you are right, now i'm a believer that evil genius bush really did plan all this out! i can't believe you figure it all out man!
the next time someone says bush is stupid im going to correct them, hell no ***** da bush planned the atackkkzzzz
the next time someone says bush is stupid im going to correct them, hell no ***** da bush planned the atackkkzzzz
When people prove your theory is wrong, or start proving your theory is wrong you resort to changing the dynamics of the conversation to something else that's a hot spot within that debate.
After a while the original debate disappears and it appears as though you win the debate about what noone remembers you were arguing about.
It's rather comical to watch people with little minds such as yourself use this tactic. Then continue avoiding questions that will further compromise your views.
Grow up a little then join the political debates.
09-16-2007, 09:18 PM
#158
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Several reports, from shortly after the attacks, said that some of the men named as hijackers on 9/11 were alive, and had been victims of identity theft. These thefts were said to have occurred as long ago as 1995. More recent reports have corrected the earlier mistaken articles.
Originally Posted by stevenb
You remind me of a few people that I had debate class with in highschool and college.
When people prove your theory is wrong, or start proving your theory is wrong you resort to changing the dynamics of the conversation to something else that's a hot spot within that debate.
After a while the original debate disappears and it appears as though you win the debate about what noone remembers you were arguing about.
It's rather comical to watch people with little minds such as yourself use this tactic. Then continue avoiding questions that will further compromise your views.
Grow up a little then join the political debates.
When people prove your theory is wrong, or start proving your theory is wrong you resort to changing the dynamics of the conversation to something else that's a hot spot within that debate.
After a while the original debate disappears and it appears as though you win the debate about what noone remembers you were arguing about.
It's rather comical to watch people with little minds such as yourself use this tactic. Then continue avoiding questions that will further compromise your views.
Grow up a little then join the political debates.
my theory is not wrong. a plane hit the pentagon. if you deny that you are dillusional.
you haven't proved ONE thing in this debate. NOTHING. not one thing. you cannot prove your theory, because IT IS NOT TRUE. its not even close to being true. its so far off in outerspace no one ever will take you seriously.
i just posted pictures taken literally 30 seconds after the plane hit, showing american airlines debris everywhere, photos taken by citizens. these photos were not seized.
don't you think all the fruity *** ******* that make these stupid claims, and if they were true they would dissapear and be killed? if you believe these theories the government has already killed thousands of citizens, why would they stop at some stupid *** kid.
you have absolutely nothing backing your theory, there isn't one single thing. except what you THINK should happen when a plane hits a concerte building.
09-16-2007, 09:20 PM
#159
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Bush could never pull all of this off himself /simple logic.
Our government isn't run by the President anyway. He acts in the interests of others, and it's not your everyday citizen. Once we all stop thinking that criticizing the government means criticizing our country, I think we'll all start seeing the light. This is the same government that makes you pay taxes on your labor, your goods, and everything else you own, and then taxes it all over again when you die. Really, it's fucked.
Our government isn't run by the President anyway. He acts in the interests of others, and it's not your everyday citizen. Once we all stop thinking that criticizing the government means criticizing our country, I think we'll all start seeing the light. This is the same government that makes you pay taxes on your labor, your goods, and everything else you own, and then taxes it all over again when you die. Really, it's fucked.
seriously, you have to be a ------- dumbass to believe any of these theories.
09-16-2007, 09:31 PM
#160
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: "Terrorism" predictions.
If anyone says this isn't the case, then Venezuala is for jooo.
http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11...commission.htm
The late Admiral Chester Ward, who resigned from the CFR in disgust after being a member for 16 years, was not exaggerating when he charged that the group's agenda is to promote "disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government." The leadership of the group, he said, "is composed of the one-world-global-government ideologists � more respectfully referred to as the organized internationalists."
The council on foriegn relations is the #1 enemy of the US, and I wonder who's running for President:
Democrat CFR Candidates:
Barack Obama
Hillary Clinton
John Edwards
Chris Dodd
Bill Richardson
Republican CFR Candidates:
Mitt Romney
Rudy Giuliani
John McCain
Fred Thompson
Newt Gingrich
Just search CFR and you'll all find out.
http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11...commission.htm
The late Admiral Chester Ward, who resigned from the CFR in disgust after being a member for 16 years, was not exaggerating when he charged that the group's agenda is to promote "disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government." The leadership of the group, he said, "is composed of the one-world-global-government ideologists � more respectfully referred to as the organized internationalists."
The council on foriegn relations is the #1 enemy of the US, and I wonder who's running for President:
Democrat CFR Candidates:
Barack Obama
Hillary Clinton
John Edwards
Chris Dodd
Bill Richardson
Republican CFR Candidates:
Mitt Romney
Rudy Giuliani
John McCain
Fred Thompson
Newt Gingrich
Just search CFR and you'll all find out.
