Ron Paul.
#141
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by buk9tp
im too poor to afford tv so idk who the ---- he is :P
but um what kind of facts could he have twisted in the 2nd vid i posted
but um what kind of facts could he have twisted in the 2nd vid i posted
its obviously he is a left wing hack
#142
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by random-strike
the only thing i don't like about ron paul is his isolationist forgein poilicy, i think it'll get us into another world war...
Originally Posted by random-strike
keith overbite countdown to no ratings is a liar, and a left wing lunatic.
#143
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Cool, lets setup a military base on every corner of every country and shrug our shoulders when we can't figure out why people want to fly planes into our buildings. If Russian forces were walking up and down your street Jonny, you'd be shooting at them as well. I'd expect it. Think about it.
Which isn't to say that most of the media, the government, and their sponsors tell the truth either. I draw the line when someone tells me the majority of our military should be on the other side of the world fighting, because a domino *could* take place and we could be there to stop Iran from building a nuke that couldn't touch us anyway, yet our backdoor is wide open. The real threat is what's coming in the back door, not what can't touch us a world away. This is what 99% of Republicans are saying, and they're full of ----.
Which isn't to say that most of the media, the government, and their sponsors tell the truth either. I draw the line when someone tells me the majority of our military should be on the other side of the world fighting, because a domino *could* take place and we could be there to stop Iran from building a nuke that couldn't touch us anyway, yet our backdoor is wide open. The real threat is what's coming in the back door, not what can't touch us a world away. This is what 99% of Republicans are saying, and they're full of ----.
they already fund all sorts of terrorist groups, and could arm them with it. they can reach israel, and other allies in the region. if that region is engulfed into war, it will ------ and we'll eventually be involved.
you're too literal and black and white on the issue.
we already know, because they have told us, why they fly planes into our buildings, they do it in the name of their religion, they want to convert us to islam, and they want to take over the world. they can't and won't... but they can cause a lot of commotion and destruction..
#144
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by random-strike
we already know, because they have told us, why they fly planes into our buildings, they do it in the name of their religion, they want to convert us to islam, and they want to take over the world. they can't and won't... but they can cause a lot of commotion and destruction..
Bottom line: we've screwed them and they're pissed.
Also, the isolationism that existed years ago is different from what Ron Paul is preaching about. Complete isolationism will cause a war most likely, like you said, but like stealthmode said...do you think the rest of the world is happy about us having military bases in their country
#145
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by junkyard racer
I actually agree with you. I agree on alot of his topics, however he just doesn't seem to give me a warm and fuzzy feeling...
as Rudy mentioned, we dont need someone who who needs OJT and I think thats what Ron is after...
as Rudy mentioned, we dont need someone who who needs OJT and I think thats what Ron is after...
#146
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by Jorsher
Do you honestly think they really give a ---- about what religion we are? Do we give a ---- what religion other nations are? No. Blowing us up because our "democracy and freedom" is what the propaganda-filled media tells us. People are only concerned with themselves. We have fucked them (and other countries) over with different foreign policies and such, and it pissed them off. If they wanted to take over the world, they would start with the weak-sauce countries around them and not jump straight to the most nig-noggest, badass country in the world. I'm not condoning their actions, but there's a lot more behind it other than "disliking our freedom."
Bottom line: we've screwed them and they're pissed.
Also, the isolationism that existed years ago is different from what Ron Paul is preaching about. Complete isolationism will cause a war most likely, like you said, but like stealthmode said...do you think the rest of the world is happy about us having military bases in their country
Bottom line: we've screwed them and they're pissed.
Also, the isolationism that existed years ago is different from what Ron Paul is preaching about. Complete isolationism will cause a war most likely, like you said, but like stealthmode said...do you think the rest of the world is happy about us having military bases in their country
we have done nothing to saudi arabia. without us, they would be nothing. they would be a dot in the desert.
yes they are, because they ALLOW US THERE.
they can tell us to GO HOME ANYTIME THEY WANT.
THEY WANT OUR PROTECTION. we are not in any country without that countries approval. Iraq could tell us to go home tomarrow if they wanted to.
they are doing it in the name of islam, we have done nothing to any middle eastern country. we helped their sorry asses against the soviet union in afganistan
#147
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by random-strike
iran doesn't need a missle to reach us with a nuke
they already fund all sorts of terrorist groups, and could arm them with it. they can reach israel, and other allies in the region. if that region is engulfed into war, it will ------ and we'll eventually be involved.
they already fund all sorts of terrorist groups, and could arm them with it. they can reach israel, and other allies in the region. if that region is engulfed into war, it will ------ and we'll eventually be involved.
Good intentions or not, if I'm a media outlet of some shithole country and I show you that, I can make you hate the Americans too. We're the Mike Tyson of the world, and Mike Tyson isn't liked.
#148
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by random-strike
osama bin laden is from saudi arabia.
#149
Re: Ron Paul.
those countries want us there, or else lost a war to us and thats why we are there
were we in germany before WWII Japan? etc?
no we were not. they started a world war. we won. we have bases there.
w/o those bases around the world, there would've been a much much much greater risk, if not certainty that communism would've enveloped the world, including us... islam is trying to do the same thing.
people don't like us the same reason people don't like the yankees... because whoever is on top is hated, no matter who is it or what they do.
we've liberated more people than the rest of the world has combined.
we should secure our borders, and confront islam, not one of the other.
johnny for president. 08. contribute to my campaign, which i will then funnel into my c6 z06 fund
btw, we are in Pakistan , Pakistan is out ally, and we're working with them to capture him, Pakistan doesn't control that part of the country, our troops are protecting the afgan government, which if it were to fall, osama and the taliban would have the country back, and it would be just like it was before sept 11th.
believe me, they are doing everything they can...
were we in germany before WWII Japan? etc?
no we were not. they started a world war. we won. we have bases there.
w/o those bases around the world, there would've been a much much much greater risk, if not certainty that communism would've enveloped the world, including us... islam is trying to do the same thing.
people don't like us the same reason people don't like the yankees... because whoever is on top is hated, no matter who is it or what they do.
we've liberated more people than the rest of the world has combined.
we should secure our borders, and confront islam, not one of the other.
johnny for president. 08. contribute to my campaign, which i will then funnel into my c6 z06 fund
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
And he's in Pakistan right now, but we aren't there, are we? If we wanted him as bad as we say we do, we'd have had him by now. But then, nobody even thinks about why we're in Afganastan looking for bin laden when we know where he really is, and all of our troops are in a completely unrelated country which has become the focus. Do you see how this isn't making any sense? It doesn't add up, and I'm done trusting a given side of the government based on my hatred for woodstock.
believe me, they are doing everything they can...
#150
Re: Ron Paul.
Originally Posted by random-strike
those countries want us there, or else lost a war to us and thats why we are there
Well that's easy. If a country doesn't want us there, we'll kick their asses and set up shop anyhow. Communism isn't a threat anymore, so why would "anti-communism" bases still be around today? It doesn't make sense, so obviously it looks like we think we own the earth. Yeah, we've liberated alot of people, which wouldn't be out of the question in the future, but I'm sure you can see from the outside looking in, what it looks like, and why INDIVIDUALS, not governments want to tear the roof off the motha.
Empathy. Evaluate the situation from both sides of the fence.