dumbassssssesssssssssss
01-27-2008, 11:18 PM
#171
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
You're not worth any more of my time to reply to. I didn't even read your past 37 posts in this thread. You can kindly go ---- yourself and enjoy a life in fear of everybody and everything around you. Enjoy.
no way dr boost, once a few more laws are passed that no criminal will follow (they're criminals afterall) he'll feel so much safer and will definitely stop trying to ban firearms (which is the lefts ultimate goal)
01-27-2008, 11:24 PM
#172
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 714
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by random-strike
you can't be serious. l
ike i said, we can't debate emotions, which is what your half wit masters degree in faggotry opinions are based on.
you admit laws will not stop anyone, yet you still think they are great because it makes you feel better, AT LEAST THEY TOOK A TEST BEFORE THEY SHOT AND KILLED ME!
ike i said, we can't debate emotions, which is what your half wit masters degree in faggotry opinions are based on.
you admit laws will not stop anyone, yet you still think they are great because it makes you feel better, AT LEAST THEY TOOK A TEST BEFORE THEY SHOT AND KILLED ME!
haha again you refer to my masters degree with such resentment. i'm sorry if your jealous. sorry if you resent higher educated people. but i'm pretty sure there is no half wit masters degree in faggotry.. but if there was you'd Ace it
laws can't stop someones will power but they can DETER a majority of people from commiting crimes. same idea as what you mention where if everyone was packing, a criminal is likely to be DETERRED. not stopped, detterred. thats the same ideal that the laws provoke. and they work. thats why there are studies just like the CAP law which reduced child accidental shootings in cases of 30-40%.
the thing with the "90%". you make supportive claims that if everyone was packing guns criminals would be deterred. but even if all gun laws were removed, not everyone would buy and carry a gun. a small percentage would that did not already. but it would NEVER be a scenario where everyone in an open public area was carrying weapons.
you stress that "if you give them an inch they will take a mile". the U.S. government HAS taken inches interms of stregthening gun control but they have never taken the mile. nor would they ever. so your fear of "give an inch take a mile" does not apply here.
really thats pretty sad that you guys can't have a conversation without mudslinging the other side with the same 5 slanders over and over. time to grow up a little bit eh guys?
-Luke
01-27-2008, 11:24 PM
#173
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 714
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by random-strike
no way dr boost, once a few more laws are passed that no criminal will follow (they're criminals afterall) he'll feel so much safer and will definitely stop trying to ban firearms (which is the lefts ultimate goal)
-Luke
01-27-2008, 11:25 PM
#174
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by lkailburn
Dr. boost if you didn't read the 3 pages then why would you post in the 4th? what difference does it make to you if we are having a conversation in a single thread. if its such a waste of your time you might want to...........NOT read the thread?
Uh, isn't that what I just said?
Just go away, please? 
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
01-27-2008, 11:28 PM
#175
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 714
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
i'm going back to the tech sections of this forum lol to you guys
-Luke
to you guys-Luke
01-27-2008, 11:29 PM
#176
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by lkailburn
to you guys
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
01-27-2008, 11:34 PM
#177
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by lkailburn
Dr. boost if you didn't read the 3 pages then why would you post in the 4th? what difference does it make to you if we are having a conversation in a single thread. if its such a waste of your time you might want to...........NOT read the thread?
haha again you refer to my masters degree with such resentment. i'm sorry if your jealous. sorry if you resent higher educated people. but i'm pretty sure there is no half wit masters degree in faggotry.. but if there was you'd Ace it
laws can't stop someones will power but they can DETER a majority of people from commiting crimes. same idea as what you mention where if everyone was packing, a criminal is likely to be DETERRED. not stopped, detterred. thats the same ideal that the laws provoke. and they work. thats why there are studies just like the CAP law which reduced child accidental shootings in cases of 30-40%.
the thing with the "90%". you make supportive claims that if everyone was packing guns criminals would be deterred. but even if all gun laws were removed, not everyone would buy and carry a gun. a small percentage would that did not already. but it would NEVER be a scenario where everyone in an open public area was carrying weapons.
you stress that "if you give them an inch they will take a mile". the U.S. government HAS taken inches interms of stregthening gun control but they have never taken the mile. nor would they ever. so your fear of "give an inch take a mile" does not apply here.
really thats pretty sad that you guys can't have a conversation without mudslinging the other side with the same 5 slanders over and over. time to grow up a little bit eh guys?
-Luke
haha again you refer to my masters degree with such resentment. i'm sorry if your jealous. sorry if you resent higher educated people. but i'm pretty sure there is no half wit masters degree in faggotry.. but if there was you'd Ace it
laws can't stop someones will power but they can DETER a majority of people from commiting crimes. same idea as what you mention where if everyone was packing, a criminal is likely to be DETERRED. not stopped, detterred. thats the same ideal that the laws provoke. and they work. thats why there are studies just like the CAP law which reduced child accidental shootings in cases of 30-40%.
the thing with the "90%". you make supportive claims that if everyone was packing guns criminals would be deterred. but even if all gun laws were removed, not everyone would buy and carry a gun. a small percentage would that did not already. but it would NEVER be a scenario where everyone in an open public area was carrying weapons.
you stress that "if you give them an inch they will take a mile". the U.S. government HAS taken inches interms of stregthening gun control but they have never taken the mile. nor would they ever. so your fear of "give an inch take a mile" does not apply here.
really thats pretty sad that you guys can't have a conversation without mudslinging the other side with the same 5 slanders over and over. time to grow up a little bit eh guys?
-Luke
how does a law saying you have to wait 5 days to buy a pistol deter anyone?
how does ANY law having to do with a firearm deter anyone?
they are using these firearms to commit other crimes.
so if i'm going to go out and murder someone with a pistol, how does the 5 day waiting period deter me? how does the sunsetted brady bill law saying i can't have over 10 rounds in my clip deter me? how does a law saying my pistol have to be in a gun case deter me from doing this?
this laws are pointless, feel good things to make woman (and metrosexuals like you) feel better.
you really need to grow up, we're all so sorry you're a panty waste and scared of firearms.
go play with obama *****.
01-27-2008, 11:48 PM
#178
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 0
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
so theoretically speaking and somehow hillary wins and put a ban on guns, does that mean you just cant buy guns anymore or will you have to turn your guns you already own into the govt?
01-27-2008, 11:49 PM
#179
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 714
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
Ah, that explains it. I knew you were one of "those" kinda guys.
random-strike - is it really nothing but slander,curse words and far-reached desperate attempts at painful comebacks? is that really all you have up your sleeve? you can't find it in you to have a grownup coversation? hey by the way what were we talking about europe? you never explained why the us dollar has plummeted in comparison.
undergrad was Applied Networking and Systems Administration. Masters was Information Technology. Rochester institute of Technology. Princeton review ranks it above the top 15% of schools across the nation. U.S. News & World Report: America’s Best Colleges ranks RIT among the best again for 2007.
-Luke
01-27-2008, 11:52 PM
#180
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: dumbassssssesssssssssss
Originally Posted by CoreyR
so theoretically speaking and somehow hillary wins and put a ban on guns, does that mean you just cant buy guns anymore or will you have to turn your guns you already own into the govt?
it would be political suicide for her to take that stance.
they do it slowly, one by one.
she may try to push to have the brady will reinacted, which puts mandatory waiting periods, and bans on high cap magazines and "assualt" style rifles which merely means semi-automatic
