bigdaddyvtec

------!!!!


There, was that effective Twit...

LOL

b18.

pancakes.

ososlohatch

wait i missed something, this is the first time i've replied to this thread

bigdaddyvtec

Your attempt at correcting my grammar was received. However; you were wrong in correcting me as originally i typed N I G G E R. therefore, AN would be inappropriate. You are far from THE brightest around here Fred (and definately not stupid by any means...). All Kiwi bashing aside. When you actually realize that and come off your soapbox... you'll have alot more fun...

As you were.

fe3tcourier

OK N|GGER, its all good ;-)

Tom-Guy

You can talk ---- and not back it up on a timely fashion. I think it's time you back up what the ---- you say for once, and get with the goddamn program. I've been waiting five days, bitch.

Fred = failure.

fe3tcourier

as i said at the end of some other post...

and

if/when i get time...

i'm not running round after you. if you've done the math, post it up and prove me wrong. if you are right, i'll accept it. if you working and logic is flawed, i'll hammer it.

simple (maybe not simple enough for you?)

bigdaddyvtec

Is that a feeble attempt at reverse psychology, or just your norrmal passive agressive reply (diffused by the coreallis affect due to you being so far south of the equator??

Id like to see a toilets water spin backwards someday.

You called JD on "bullshit" prove him wrong or JSTFUN!!!!




LOL

fe3tcourier

i never called him on "bullshit".

what i did was notice that his references didnt say what he said they said, and didnt prove anything like what we are attempting to discuss, and disagreed with the statement at the top that says "no cooling occurs" with an implicit period. if he'd said "no cooling occurs on a well setup system" i would have thought about it and agreed.

hes saying that its not possible at all, i'm saying that i think some does occur, and that i dont know how much, but i suspect 10C or so or more.

we are getting close to the ball now though. if hes done the math, he should spend his time typing it in instead of trying to toy with me.

i'll bother at some stage when i have less to do... at the moment i have more to do and thus wont.

i never noticed which way the water spins, but i have a strong feeling that it has a lot to do with existing turbulence in the water at the time when it begins spinning. in a perfectly still volume with only random diffusion however ...

Tom-Guy

I don't think so, Fred.

You provided "proof" by mathematically illustrating a case that is nonsense in the real world; 3000 rpms on a 2 liter engine at 0 psi and 100% volumetric efficiency. Not only is it impossible to get 100% VE at atmospheric pressure, but nobody sprays water at zero ------- psi in a turbo forum, Fred.

You came up, based on your flawed example, with 128 ms and then stated that this was a long enough time to evaporate water, without ever doing any calculations to back it. You are incapable of finding thermal equilibrium over infinite time for the simplistic and wholly inadequate mathematical model that you already blathered, much less more complex calculations such as the amount of thermal transfer from charge to water in the given dwell time for a REAL amount of airmass, where water/diluent would actually be sprayed in the real ------- world.

You sat down and calculated NOTHING, based off of figures that mean NOTHING, with direct application to NOTHING. You spent real time working with the figures, logically manipulating them, and could not realise that they were horseshit... it took me five ------- seconds, Fred. I'm not explaining to you the math required for you to continue to completely misunderstand, make more stupid claims because you are too arrogant to ask basic questions about concepts you don't understand, and continue to waste everyone's time in this thread. You have demonstrated a real deficit of understanding... this isn't a thread about you proving you are correct, Fred, because you've proven you don't know ----. This is a ----------ing thread about whether or not you are capable of learning.

You post----- this thread all the time. You post----- this and other forums all the time. You have ------- time to do a little simple math so quit with your lies and your arrogant condescention based on your zero real-world experience. What you are really saying is that you don't care to make yourself out to be an utter fool after you've talked yourself up repeatedly and brought nothing to back your claims with. Me, I can point to a television set, or link to Streetfire, or get a couple hundred vouches from EVERY owner of every car I have ever tuned, anytime I need to demonstrate my mastery. You're the person who has something to prove - ------- do so.


That's a bullshit statement right there, Fred.

Time to rename this thread to Fred's Failure Thread.