your being DRAFTED!...
#191
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Originally Posted by nonvtec
The economy nevertheless sucked for the past 3 years until the war came around.
#192
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by nonvtec
The economy nevertheless sucked for the past 3 years until the war came around.
yeah it did when bush went into office. it was fine when clinton was president and he didn't have to go to war
#193
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by nonvtec
The economy nevertheless sucked for the past 3 years until the war came around.
#194
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Originally Posted by Imadouche
Originally Posted by davcivic
Didn't Clinton want to go to Iraq first, but didn't. We had a good period economically wise, but it was all going down, it's the natural cycle of how our economy works. I don't blame bush for that.
Exactly!!!! The only reason Clinton didnt go is Because the UN wouldnt let him they instead let him bomb potential weapons building sites in 98 and 99 with cruise missles. And what you said about the natural Cycle of the economy is right on too.
#196
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by Imadouche
Originally Posted by davcivic
Didn't Clinton want to go to Iraq first, but didn't. We had a good period economically wise, but it was all going down, it's the natural cycle of how our economy works. I don't blame bush for that.
Exactly!!!! The only reason Clinton didnt go is Because the UN wouldnt let him they instead let him bomb potential weapons building sites in 98 and 99 with cruise missles. And what you said about the natural Cycle of the economy is right on too.
Clinton bombed, kosovo, somalia, iraq, syria... and um someone else help me with the others... btw the "chemical weapons" plant in Syria was really a asprin factory. but i don't hear any liberals whining about that. liberals = finger in the wind scumbags... thats all and thats it
#197
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
Originally Posted by Imadouche
Originally Posted by davcivic
Didn't Clinton want to go to Iraq first, but didn't. We had a good period economically wise, but it was all going down, it's the natural cycle of how our economy works. I don't blame bush for that.
Exactly!!!! The only reason Clinton didnt go is Because the UN wouldnt let him they instead let him bomb potential weapons building sites in 98 and 99 with cruise missles. And what you said about the natural Cycle of the economy is right on too.
Clinton bombed, kosovo, somalia, iraq, syria... and um someone else help me with the others... btw the "chemical weapons" plant in Syria was really a asprin factory. but i don't hear any liberals whining about that. liberals = finger in the wind scumbags... thats all and thats it
#199
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Alright guys, fighting about whether Clinton would rock Bush isn't going to get anywhere. Anyway, yeah, Clinton was bombing people, at least he wasn't sending our troops to die for WMD's that don't exist.
#200
Re:your being DRAFTED!...
Originally Posted by random-strike
moron. plain and simple