Honda V6 engines (is it worth the effort)
11-27-2006, 12:16 PM
#33
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 175
Re: Honda V6 engines (is it worth the effort)
but still...would 400hp be possible from this engine ? I mean...when the car weights like 500kg....i definatly need at least 300hp just to get it moving from its place :P
11-27-2006, 01:07 PM
#34
0.5 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 54
Re: Honda V6 engines (is it worth the effort)
Originally Posted by NNBD
but still...would 400hp be possible from this engine ? I mean...when the car weights like 500kg....i definatly need at least 300hp just to get it moving from its place :P
11-27-2006, 10:32 PM
#37
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 661
Re: Honda V6 engines (is it worth the effort)
Originally Posted by ONDUHFLO
Yer a ------ Douchebag. Ive only seen 1 actual JDM K20a "Type R" motor in person, It's pretty rare this side of JAPAN.... and if you think you're going to buy one for 5k you better keep saving your pennies, Junior.
11-28-2006, 11:34 AM
#38
0.5 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 108
Re: Honda V6 engines (is it worth the effort)
My brother had a v6 legend, it was manual with the v6 (I think it was a 2.6), and it ------- hauled ***** considering he just had intake and exhaust. I mean, his was a '89 or '88 2 door, and he was getting a newer (97-01) SS camaro around corners and ----. And it pulled happily to bury the 140mph speedo, all the way. We've (my brother and I) always wanted to do something like you're doing with that very engine, maybe with twin turbos, or even a screw-type supercharger. I say, use the old 2.6 with the 5 sp gearbox, then build up the block a bit and see what it can do.
11-28-2006, 05:31 PM
#40
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 175
Re: Honda V6 engines (is it worth the effort)
Hmm interesting...you see, the
2.7L has
2675 cm3
bore x stroke 87,0 x 75,0 mm
comp. 9,0:1
max. power 124 kW (169 pk) 5900tpm
max. torque 225 Nm 4500tpm
The 2.5L:
2493 cm3
bore x stroke 84,0 x 75,0 mm
comp. 9,6:1
max. power 127 kW (173 pk) 6000tpm
max. torque 217 Nm 5000tpm
And the 3.2L
3206 cm3
bore x stroke 90,0 x 84,0 mm
comp. 9,6:1
max. power 151 kW (205 pk) 5500tpm
max. torque 293 Nm 4400tpm
It seems that the 2.7 is the least powerfull...it will probably be the 3.2L that im going for. If the 2.7 is fun...the 3.2 should be more fun.
It does have pretty some compession i guess for going turbo...not much more than a zc though
2.7L has
2675 cm3
bore x stroke 87,0 x 75,0 mm
comp. 9,0:1
max. power 124 kW (169 pk) 5900tpm
max. torque 225 Nm 4500tpm
The 2.5L:
2493 cm3
bore x stroke 84,0 x 75,0 mm
comp. 9,6:1
max. power 127 kW (173 pk) 6000tpm
max. torque 217 Nm 5000tpm
And the 3.2L
3206 cm3
bore x stroke 90,0 x 84,0 mm
comp. 9,6:1
max. power 151 kW (205 pk) 5500tpm
max. torque 293 Nm 4400tpm
It seems that the 2.7 is the least powerfull...it will probably be the 3.2L that im going for. If the 2.7 is fun...the 3.2 should be more fun.
It does have pretty some compession i guess for going turbo...not much more than a zc though
