VR4 owner new to the boards
01-06-2006, 07:37 PM
#132
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 75
Re: VR4 owner new to the boards
Dude, did you not see my ------- sn-95 New Edge Mustang Gt? It's the second slowest car among the three, the slowest being my daily-driven 02 Accord ex. I like fox bodies, I owned and 88 conv. Gt and 93 conv. LX. I like stangs, GOBBSS of potential. Even faster than the vr4 
01-06-2006, 07:41 PM
#133
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: VR4 owner new to the boards
eh, i almost bought a TT stealth... it was a 96 i belive?? can't remember... i offered the guy 4k for it... from 6k LOL i had cash... he wouldnt budge... so i didnt go for it.
i thought it was pretty cool inside... the leather was pretty nice
i thought it was pretty cool inside... the leather was pretty nice
01-06-2006, 07:45 PM
#134
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 75
Re: VR4 owner new to the boards
you STILL didn't comment about the stang. I say enough about the ------- vr4. I am tired of talking about it. It's an awesome car. The mustnag is going to be awesome after I install these frpp 4.10 gears I have here. I can't wait.
01-06-2006, 07:57 PM
#137
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 75
Re: VR4 owner new to the boards
I'm gonna leave her n/a, but if I went forced, it would def. be turbo. Every vid I see of a turbo stang vs. supercharged shows supercharged jump out front, only to then hear an evil hiss as th turbo stang builds boost and FLIES THE ---- BY!! I love that sound.
01-06-2006, 07:59 PM
#138
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 18
Re: VR4 owner new to the boards
Originally Posted by rawr
id say youd have to get a good 9000 people to start outnumbering the hondas on here.
01-06-2006, 08:04 PM
#139
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4
Re: VR4 owner new to the boards
Originally Posted by BlackDragon
did you not read what i wrote? I said the skyline horsepower is underated. Its makes more than 300hp its a fact.http://www.jbskyline.net/R34/GTR/index2.php here the link buddy.
The pig of a Vr4 is ---- compare to a skyline. 1/4 times skyline would rape that tank.
The pig of a Vr4 is ---- compare to a skyline. 1/4 times skyline would rape that tank.
01-06-2006, 08:09 PM
#140
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,028
Re: VR4 owner new to the boards
My fault on the DSM / Mitsubishi mix up there.
I just figured since 3000GT's are just as unreliable and prone to breakage as Eclipses and what not....you get the picture.
I still don't like the "muscle car" term used on Japanese cars. Muscle car implies raw brute strength instead of "oh 6 cylinders isn't enough, let's add a turbo and then how it goes." The only exception I can see to that would be a GNX.
Why are you guys hell bent on using the term muscle car to describe Japanese cars anyways? Doesn't performance car work just as well? Or do you feel the need to try and fit in somewhere you don't belong. Thats usually the last thing I think of when I hear the word muscle or muscle car. That being Japan or their cars. The term muscle is reserved for American cars that make power with raw displacement and cylinder count, rather than raw high RPM capability and turbo count.
For the sake of argument I'm with random strike, hotrex, and rawr on this one. You VR4 guys who came here bashing what HMT is established on, and you guys who feel the need to describe japanese performance cars as "muscle" cars - get bent. You know who you are.
I just figured since 3000GT's are just as unreliable and prone to breakage as Eclipses and what not....you get the picture.
I still don't like the "muscle car" term used on Japanese cars. Muscle car implies raw brute strength instead of "oh 6 cylinders isn't enough, let's add a turbo and then how it goes." The only exception I can see to that would be a GNX.
Why are you guys hell bent on using the term muscle car to describe Japanese cars anyways? Doesn't performance car work just as well? Or do you feel the need to try and fit in somewhere you don't belong. Thats usually the last thing I think of when I hear the word muscle or muscle car. That being Japan or their cars. The term muscle is reserved for American cars that make power with raw displacement and cylinder count, rather than raw high RPM capability and turbo count.
For the sake of argument I'm with random strike, hotrex, and rawr on this one. You VR4 guys who came here bashing what HMT is established on, and you guys who feel the need to describe japanese performance cars as "muscle" cars - get bent. You know who you are.
