*OFFICIAL* Z06 shits on GTR
#61
Re: *OFFICIAL* Z06 ***** on GTR
Originally Posted by random-strike
i was talking about the GTR engine.
Anyhow, would much rather have a NA big displacement v8 than an already-boosted smaller v6 that's practically the same performance.
The vette has shittons more potential, and looks better IMO.
#62
Re: *OFFICIAL* Z06 ***** on GTR
Originally Posted by Jorsher
I think when they tested the c6 didn't they have good things to say (for once)?
#64
Re: *OFFICIAL* Z06 ***** on GTR
c4 was junk (based on its appearance, not facts) so the c5 would have sucked without a big improvement.
The c5 and c6 might be pretty similar - but doesn't the z06 have ceramic brakes, lighter weight, more power, better fuel economy, uses carbon fiber, some fancy electronic suspension, pretty much everything improved? The c6 received quite a bit of praise and it did improve everything about the previous model.
Anyone seen the corvette concept in transformers 2?
The c5 and c6 might be pretty similar - but doesn't the z06 have ceramic brakes, lighter weight, more power, better fuel economy, uses carbon fiber, some fancy electronic suspension, pretty much everything improved? The c6 received quite a bit of praise and it did improve everything about the previous model.
Anyone seen the corvette concept in transformers 2?
#65
Re: *OFFICIAL* Z06 ***** on GTR
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Nothing against some of the older cars, but the C5 was a HUGE improvement. Comparatively the C6 isn't a whole lot better, it does come with some awesome engine/package options, but the backbone of the car isn't much improved.
you should read up on both generations.
the c6 is superior
#66
Re: *OFFICIAL* Z06 ***** on GTR
Originally Posted by random-strike
the c5 and c6 are very very very different cars.
you should read up on both generations.
the c6 is superior
you should read up on both generations.
the c6 is superior
#68
Re: *OFFICIAL* Z06 ***** on GTR
Dosent matter what you queers say. No way in hell a 7.0 should be compaird to 3.7 v6 with two tiny *** turbos. That is just obserd. Sure, the nissan motor is more "advanced" but the ls7 is ------- huge.
It is similar to compair a Altima SER to a 1.8t Jetta. The 1.8t is more advanced, but the car will be smashed by the Altima, stock for stock. You would have to give the Jetta a bigger turbo, or more boost, then it would be fair.
Some would say 'No replacment for displacment'(true) wile others think that technology is the replacment. Well through that same technology on a bigger motor, and it will out preform.
Any way, to call the GTR trash cause a fiberglass car with a 7L beast of a ------- motor beat it is ignorant.
DOnt think im some GTR 'fanboi' I personally like the vette beter.
It is similar to compair a Altima SER to a 1.8t Jetta. The 1.8t is more advanced, but the car will be smashed by the Altima, stock for stock. You would have to give the Jetta a bigger turbo, or more boost, then it would be fair.
Some would say 'No replacment for displacment'(true) wile others think that technology is the replacment. Well through that same technology on a bigger motor, and it will out preform.
Any way, to call the GTR trash cause a fiberglass car with a 7L beast of a ------- motor beat it is ignorant.
DOnt think im some GTR 'fanboi' I personally like the vette beter.