Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2007, 04:30 PM
  #21  
1.0 BAR
 
T0DA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 315
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Anyone else see the $2007 GRM Colt? Ran an 11, and total costs were like $2k. ------- sweet.
T0DA is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:32 PM
  #22  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
You fail at basic reading comprehension. Nobody said the engine was better than the 4g, just not the gm-like feces that was suggested.

One of those small advantages you failed to ask an explaination for was the fact that the 1.8 is cheap and fits easily into a late 80's mirage/colt/summit, which is mistus equal to the ED/EF hatch if you will, with little to no modification, which in full trim soaking wet weighs an incredible 2200lbs. and usually costs less than your average insurance premium.

Also many of those on this particular board will find an 80's hatch far less homosexual than a miata of equal value.

Pot, kettle, black.

lol nice
bitchasscracker is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 06:50 PM
  #23  
0.5 BAR
 
P90Puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 61
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
You fail at basic reading comprehension. Nobody said the engine was better than the 4g, just not the gm-like feces that was suggested.

One of those small advantages you failed to ask an explaination for was the fact that the 1.8 is cheap and fits easily into a late 80's mirage/colt/summit, which is mistus equal to the ED/EF hatch if you will, with little to no modification, which in full trim soaking wet weighs an incredible 2200lbs. and usually costs less than your average insurance premium.

Also many of those on this particular board will find an 80's hatch far less homosexual than a miata of equal value.

Pot, kettle, black.
And the 4g63t fits into a 89-92 Colt/Summit/Mirage hatch without issue, I know. I owned a 4g61t 89 Turbo colt.

Who gives a ---- if it is far less homosexual then a miata. ---- If I care, the car handles 100x better then any dsm or colt hatch. Makes power just as easily and to the proper wheels.

And yes, the $2006/2007 GRM Colt was 4g63 based, not 4G37 based.

Go check out 4g61t.org for more info. I used to be active there, under this nick.

Some guy went 200mph for under 3-4k.

FWD is boring, and almost nobody had an AWD Hatch when I was active. Even then, they don't handle good enough for me.

Edit: Anyways, my "gay" miata has no bearing that a horrible motor such as the 4G37, was called "a kick *** bottom end" and the 4G63 which is the FASTEST 4 cylinder in the world (brent rau 6.xx @ 2xx mph) was called a POS. You may say your D-series is better then a k, but that is a crock of ----. There is NO point of swapping in a worse motor for the same amount of money. (4g63 vs 4g37 , not D vs K)
P90Puma is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 07:02 PM
  #24  
1.0 BAR
 
T0DA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 315
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

For cost-effectiveness, yes, a D-series is better than a K. If a D blows up its what free-$200 for a new one? Any part on a K-series breaks internally and you're out a fuckload of money.
FAKLAD
T0DA is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 07:03 PM
  #25  
0.5 BAR
 
P90Puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 61
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by T0DA
For cost-effectiveness, yes, a D-series is better than a K. If a D blows up its what free-$200 for a new one? Any part on a K-series breaks internally and you're out a fuckload of money.
FAKLAD
Yes, but the 4g63 can be had for a couple hundred bucks too.
P90Puma is offline  
Old 11-24-2007, 01:51 AM
  #26  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by P90Puma
Yes, but the 4g63 can be had for a couple hundred bucks too.
and the 4g37 for about $50





reguardless miata's are gay
bitchasscracker is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:11 PM
  #27  
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Nismo-san's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 142
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

I own a DSM......I ------- hate DSM's, but i love starting a thread to get everyone fighting over such stupid ----.....
Nismo-san is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 11:43 PM
  #28  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by Nismo-san
I own a DSM......I ------- hate DSM's, but i love starting a thread to get everyone fighting over such stupid ----.....


your so clever



i still got the manifold if you want to buy it
bitchasscracker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kErO-916
Turbo Parts For Sale
6
04-20-2003 01:01 AM
AdrenalineSTR
Hybrid/Tech
4
04-18-2003 04:26 AM
JD
Forced Induction
10
04-04-2003 02:43 AM
dc2beatu
Forced Induction
4
03-28-2003 04:52 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 AM.