lol about as fast a gsr lol....sry there both slowwwwwwww. but im boost driven so. makes a lil difference, maybe there better engines boosted but i've tuned a few gsr's and there weak sauce. i'm all about the mitsubishi mirage hatchback 4g63t swapped revolution.

 

nah the 2.2 and 2.5 dodges are great. i've never blown a headgasket and i ran 350fwhp on a stock block with a super 60 turbo (custom tune by me).
I blew a bunch of turbo's tho haha took them well out of efficient ranges. and i still got 25mpg city
maybe i had a diamond in the rough tho haha

 

the only thing gm knows how to do is build v8's

 

and economic pieces of crap. only plus for economic performance with gm is suzuki

 

shitty v8's. most of those bullshit v8's cant touch any honda for power-per-litre. ---- i had a 84 camaro z28 "HO" with a whoooping 180ish? hp from a 5.0.

even a good gm 5.7 say 350 hp n/a is pritty good, 61.4 hp for every litre

and take the shitiest honda d16 at say 100-110 hp - 68ish hp per litre

h22 sits around 90 hp per liter, b18 is up by 100 hp per litre.

so tell me, if gm v8s cant compete with honda 4 bangers how the ---- do you get off saying there 4 cylinders would hold there own....

And thats not getting into boost where hondas shine, 300 from a 1.6 is not hard, and thats 187.5 hp per litre.

 

this is real interesting. i had alot of problems with my 2.5 cam seized and always knockeda little..

 

the heads on those quad 4's are the most retarded ---- in the world. each cam literaly has its own little head and those 2 heads bolt to the head, that bolts to the block. kiss....Keep It Simple Stupid.

 

not to mention the coil pack/wires/valve cover bullshit contraption that gets a hairline crack in its shity plastic and stops the car from running. try to find a quad 4 coil pack in a junk yard. you wont, and its NOT because there are no quad 4's in there, thats for sure.

Iv dismantled many a car at the junkyard in my 3 years and honestly the quad 4 has always stuck out as a peice of ----, right up there with pulling a jaguar v12 cylinder head, which has about 40 million tight fitting studs, not even a forklift and bouncing the car off the ground took that unbolted head off, took atleast 2 hours to slowly shimmy it up perfectly evenly befor it came off. no wonder most jags get 350s.

Hear are a just a few reasons, coil pack as mentioned, stupid *** head design, timing cover has to be completly removed to do realy any motor work and thats a pain in the *** cuz they have more bolts in the timing cover then they do in the inside of the engine =/ and the list can go on.

 

well you wanna talk about crazy bastard engins has anyone worked on the gm 3.4 dohc? i tore one down and i swore it was an indy car engine it was soooooo over engineered

 

its cuz everyone needs one for there hunk of ----! hahahaha