ochizon

I dont care wether or not the cavilier can beat a corvette.

1. 1/10th sec per 100lbs? I can believe that internet myth is still alive.

2. Dont talk ---- about a 400hp "built" honda motor when your modded TWO.TWO LITER cant break 230hp.

3. You drive a "new" (5 year old) cavalier. You really dont have room to make fun of other rides, even 15 year old hondas.

other than that, carry on.

boostedJ

your so dumb...................

I'm stock internals........ sorry to rain on your parade.........

BONE STOCK INTERNALs............. I changed the valve cover gasket..................

so shut up .....

second.....

hahahahahahahahaha thats an old sig..... old numbers....... and if you read my first post.... which you OBVIOUSLY DIDN'T...... you'd see I was having eletrical problems, check engine light, car running in limp mode........and open loop.........

I now have updated numbers, etc...... haven't posted because I haven't had reason to post the dyno sheet yet.... MORON................

I ran 231whp and 241wtq at 8.5psi this time around ...... if you'd like I could post the dyno chart.... NO PROBLEM...... like I did last time ...... just because I didn't post about it on JBO, doesn't mean it didn't happen...........

I was getting heat from people on JBO about posting my numbers.... so when I fixed the eletrical problems in nov, I towed it and got it re dynoed............. @ 8.5 psi .... put down more then I did at 10.8 psi........ the car was obviously fixed.........

since then I fixed everything else.... (blown turbo, etc...).........
so why don't you get your head out of your ***...........shut the ---- up .......... and know your role...... volume king my ***..............

let me know if you guys want the chart.......

Lee

hotrex

go back to jbo douchebag

RJwaggs

You're correct, I have not lightened a FWD vehicle, but I do know a little something, all due to reading and education though, my personal hands-on experience is limited due to personal set-backs.

Anywhoo, we know that on a see-saw(sp?) the weight of the board is evenly distributed due to a support placed dead center. This way, if weight was removed from the rear, then more weight would be placed on the front. A vehicle is not made this way as you very well know. The weight in the rear intern places a load on the front because as the middle is acted upon by a force, it is distributed throughout the body. Thus, weight in the rear and middle, does infact affect the weight placed on the front wheels. It may not affect it to a massive degree, but it does infact play a role. If you have individual scales, do the expierement, if I am proved wrong, then I am wrong, but I think the difference will be apparent.

Also, about a year ago there was a link posted in the general discussion on this board I believe, in which a vehicle was stripped to the bare minimum, using something like an aluminum seat, frame, steering wheel and motor. No roof, no panels, no nothing besides what makes it go, and the improvements in ET showed that the gains were nothing like 10hp/100lbs.

regards,
bubba

2gr84u

Why are you knocking on people with older cars? You have a newer cavalier for one, the cavalier is far from anything worth bragging about and secondly you have a stripped out car. A completly stripped out cavi is gonna be as much a peice of ---- as a 15 year old car, the funny thing a crx with a clean paint job and a decent motor will sell for more then your stripped pos cavi. I REALLY hope that darwin does us all a favor and you wrap your self around a tree in your "fast" cavailier the next time your compelled to be a jack *** street racing moron.

ochizon

no, hes totally right.

200hp at 3000lbs is one second slower than
200hp at 2000lbs, which is one second slower than
200hp at 1000lbs, which is one second slower than
200hp at zero lbs.

Makes perfect sense.

Dont try reasoning with this dick face, he doesnt know ----.


bottom line? lbs/hp is a decent comparison, not that 1/10 sec/100lbs retarded monkey bullshit.

RedCavz

bottom line, who cares

ochizon

----, you're right...

volumeking333

SO you dyno'd in November after you fixed your electrical problems that you had the other day

and how come when you first came here in January, IN your first thread
yet you dyno'd in NOV wouldn't you have updated that number?? no one here was giving you ---- for posting your numbers.. people on JBO were because you said you had 222.3WHP in EVERY ------- POST you made, not some but EVERY ONE you made it clear.

and i find it hard to believe that you wouldn't post an updated dyno chart, when you will post updated pictures of your charge piping doesn't make much sence

and the blown turbo was before you even dyno'd the FIRST time so thats not one of the "problems" you've fixed since you dyno'd last

IndianRide

your *** just got owned, also I noticed that each time you posted about racing the corvette your qtr. mile time got faster first you said 14.1, than you said 14.0, than you said 13.9. But I recall in your first post here you said you had like 260hp but than your dyno chart sadi 220 something, also you said you ran a 14.6, where is your timeslip for that one pass where you got all three numbers? damn we should alll praise you, I mean you put a turbo on your car thats amazing considering the majority of the people on here have done the same thing but wait you drive gods gift to man the cavalier we should praise you forever. You said a honda will never make more trq. than hp that proves how retarded you actually are fseries make more trq. than hp, d series make more trq. than hp. No one is impressed with your pos car with a turbo kit, I want to see what your built motor puts donw in comparison to hotrexs, oh wait you don't have a built motor so stfu, oh wait I know your going to say its in the process, well guess what its not done, you have no proof, and your full of ---- so go suck a big **** ***