These basemap settings sound ok? (Uberdata)
06-13-2005, 05:58 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
These basemap settings sound ok? (Uberdata)
First let me tell you the setup:
D15b7 (stock)
450cc injectors
T3 .48/.60
JRC 6" fmic
2.5" charge piping
I took the stockgsr.bin and imported the P06 bin. I then applied 120 for the boost fuel efficiency and a 0.9 boost ignition retard. Adjusted the map for my 450's. Disabled vtec and PA sensor. Left ELD on.
Anything I should have done differently or can be done better? I'm just lookin for a basemap that will be pretty rich/safe to start tuning with my LM-1. PA sensor is knock sensor right?
D15b7 (stock)
450cc injectors
T3 .48/.60
JRC 6" fmic
2.5" charge piping
I took the stockgsr.bin and imported the P06 bin. I then applied 120 for the boost fuel efficiency and a 0.9 boost ignition retard. Adjusted the map for my 450's. Disabled vtec and PA sensor. Left ELD on.
Anything I should have done differently or can be done better? I'm just lookin for a basemap that will be pretty rich/safe to start tuning with my LM-1. PA sensor is knock sensor right?
06-14-2005, 02:55 AM
#4
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,830
Re: These basemap settings sound ok? (Uberdata)
The p06 import maps look funny to me. Im sure they could very well be the correct ign map for that car, but dam, almost 20* of timing by 1500rpm? That thing has some serious timing up top too. Looks like an H22 almost. Just thinking in terms of bore/stroke, those #'s just dont seem right.
And on your Ign map, come 6500rpm and 8psi...yeee haaaaa. haha
If it was my engine, Id rock something like this until you got it on a dyno to find what it wanted to make good/safe power.
Make your idle portion like this, so there is no room for error when timing it.
This is not a .??* per psi map, just something I pulled outa my ***.
Good luck with your build dude.
And on your Ign map, come 6500rpm and 8psi...yeee haaaaa. haha
If it was my engine, Id rock something like this until you got it on a dyno to find what it wanted to make good/safe power.
Make your idle portion like this, so there is no room for error when timing it.
This is not a .??* per psi map, just something I pulled outa my ***.
Good luck with your build dude.
06-14-2005, 09:53 AM
#6
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 949
Re: These basemap settings sound ok? (Uberdata)
LOL...
I set up my ignition tables with 1.8, since it has more specific settings than 1.7 (0-3 PSI, 4-6, etc...)
Cut and paste back to 1.7, save, burn, etc... Using 0.9 ignition is way retarded.
I set up my ignition tables with 1.8, since it has more specific settings than 1.7 (0-3 PSI, 4-6, etc...)
Cut and paste back to 1.7, save, burn, etc... Using 0.9 ignition is way retarded.
06-23-2005, 12:12 AM
#7
0.5 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 198
Re: These basemap settings sound ok? (Uberdata)
yea i agree with leed, i think you have too much timing in your map. look to have around 20* at 8 psi high up in the rpm range, which is about 7ish degrees retarded, a good safe setting. just today i made a basemap and set boost to 120, and it was in the low 10's. i changed it to like 117 and it changed the fuel value from like 430 to about 395 where i was looking, and got the af in the 11's.
pa is the ambient air pressure sensor, found in jdm ecus
pa is the ambient air pressure sensor, found in jdm ecus
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Minor Threat
Engine Management
6
04-10-2006 12:11 AM
b20accord
Engine Management
11
09-15-2005 02:04 AM
juli0_bustamante
Engine Management
4
06-27-2005 04:48 PM
FooK
Engine Management
19
05-23-2005 05:12 PM
aracer69
Engine Management
2
06-22-2003 07:37 PM
