lower tourqe mounts (EG/B18c1)
#43
Re: lower tourqe mounts (EG/B18c1)
thats what prevents the rocking of back and forth.
but you really only get that if you have torque, which anything except f/h doesnt have torque.
unless you consider 100ft/lbs tons of torque.
but you really only get that if you have torque, which anything except f/h doesnt have torque.
unless you consider 100ft/lbs tons of torque.
#45
Re: lower tourqe mounts (EG/B18c1)
Originally Posted by d112crzy
thats what prevents the rocking of back and forth.
but you really only get that if you have torque, which anything except f/h doesnt have torque.
unless you consider 100ft/lbs tons of torque.
but you really only get that if you have torque, which anything except f/h doesnt have torque.
unless you consider 100ft/lbs tons of torque.
Actually, I do.
In first gear you have the following gear ratio, 3.25 x 4.25 x 100ft lbs = 1381ft lbs of torque. Also the radius of most tires that hondas use is about 12" so that 100ft lbs of torque from the engine is 1381ft lbs to the pavement.
Even in fifth, there is more than enough to snap you like a twig.
#49
Re: lower tourqe mounts (EG/B18c1)
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
About 4000 ft/lbs should be enough to pop the *** end of a Civic in the air if you launch in reverse.
Big *** slicks, 300 ft lbs of torque, and a unobtanium reverse gear coming right up. :P
#50
Re: lower tourqe mounts (EG/B18c1)
Originally Posted by iceracercrx
Did someone say solid mounts.
I got fucked out of 300 bucks on a set of shitting mounts (1st gen to b motor)
So I built these, I don't care if it shakes.
Randy
I got fucked out of 300 bucks on a set of shitting mounts (1st gen to b motor)
So I built these, I don't care if it shakes.
Randy