Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
That era was not about turning Jews..... It was about the straight :y
|
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Some manufacturers correctly design the car in the first place.
the car was a good handling car in 1967. https://maecomotorsport.com/images/MHTA1481.jpg http://www.svra.com/SVRA/PhotoGal.ns...JEN-63BTMY.jpg |
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
'70-'73. You could get a similar appearance with a solid strip of bumper for a couple years, IIRC, until maybe '76?
|
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
|
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
That's a pile of crap, snafu. Try an older split-bumper...
http://popularhotrodding.com/feature...ellow_14_z.jpg |
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
I wish I could find a 1st gen... I know a kid whos dad has had one for about 10 years, it just sits in their yard, he won't do anything with it... It's a shame, really...
|
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
i love the first gens but the 70-73 split bumpers are ------- sexy... me and my uncle have been bputting his 70 1/2 split nose together. its almost done.. built 383 blah blah blah blah
|
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
damn that ---- has a stack cluster also.....id rock it O0
|
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
Sex on wheels.
|
Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
Originally Posted by random-strike
the car was a good handling car in 1967.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands