Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

2nd gen Camaros are better.

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

I love the car, but damn...

Leave the 302's in the Fords.

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

http://www.acarshow.com/c2zblglf.jpg

Compared to

http://www.arkansascamaro.com/MarkzMain.jpg

:-X

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

That's a pile of crap, snafu. Try an older split-bumper...

http://popularhotrodding.com/feature...ellow_14_z.jpg

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

Ah, the early 70's Camaros? Wern't those like 70-72 or something? Those are sexy, but from there, leading up to the 4th gens, give the F-body a bad name in my book.

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

'70-'73. You could get a similar appearance with a solid strip of bumper for a couple years, IIRC, until maybe '76?

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

2nd gens are pretty cool.

but 1st gen just screams muscle car

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

1st gen just screams semi-uncontrollable car due to poor suspension design.

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

they make kits to solve that..

Re: Tite rollin' 5.0 redefined.
 

Some manufacturers correctly design the car in the first place.