Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
06-12-2007, 02:57 PM
#131
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
Originally Posted by d-man
Why the ---- would you put a parashute on a show car with full interior? Something sounds fishy here.
06-12-2007, 03:12 PM
#132
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
Originally Posted by burkej62
I beg to differ, *** munch. You are a hyundai guy. You are visitng this fourm bitching and moaning and trying to convice some guys who don't care that your ride is less a piece of ---- than ours. This is NOT a honda forum, but a mixing pot for anything with a turbo. Nonetheless, we don't ------- care so go cry somewhere else bitch ****.
Originally Posted by random-strike
hyundais and gay slow gook made peices of ----.
where is the arguement lol
where is the arguement lol
Originally Posted by burkej62
---- hyundai's and their beta motors. I HAD a 2000 elantra 2.0 turbo I ran that ---- at 9 psi and it went BANG so don't try tell me your ---- is fast because it was still ------- slow . How's that you ------- **** suckers comming from an owner i'll still say it sucked **** and there is absolutley NO afordable Fuel Manegmant. Not to mention everything is over priced like the K spec manifolds . We don't give a ----, so once again shut the ---- up and stop trying to argue a point that means nothing to us. It just proves how pathetic you are that yous all flock here to try and convice us your cars aren't ---- , and we don't care. Let me tell you somehting , your driving a ------- ECONOMY car, ll cars under 30 G are ---- now a days and you sure as ---- didn't pay 30 G for a ------- elantra . If you post one more time i will end your life with a broom stick. 
Don't complain about costs to tune a beta engine, tune your b16 civic and let the guys with the cash do our ---- and as for fuel management there are remapped ecus, megasquirt, Haltech, electromotive, microtech and a bunch more options they are just a little expensive.
06-12-2007, 03:25 PM
#133
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
Originally Posted by mayollo072R
So apparently this is a Honda forum, right? You are the assmunch who talk ---- this is homade turbo forum not honda turbo forum so I'm not visiting any Honduh forrum.
Talking ---- just for talk
Should I remind you that any N/A engine needs more fuel when you turbocharge it. 9psi with the stock fuel system, implosion man. It was hot inside that engine. If you add more air (cfm) to the combustion chamber you need more fuel to compensate the amount of air entering. You run a lean a/f mix and of course it goes bang dork. Even forged pistons can melt when you lean out.
Don't complain about costs to tune a beta engine, tune your b16 civic and let the guys with the cash do our ---- and as for fuel management there are remapped ecus, megasquirt, Haltech, electromotive, microtech and a bunch more options they are just a little expensive.
Talking ---- just for talk
Should I remind you that any N/A engine needs more fuel when you turbocharge it. 9psi with the stock fuel system, implosion man. It was hot inside that engine. If you add more air (cfm) to the combustion chamber you need more fuel to compensate the amount of air entering. You run a lean a/f mix and of course it goes bang dork. Even forged pistons can melt when you lean out.
Don't complain about costs to tune a beta engine, tune your b16 civic and let the guys with the cash do our ---- and as for fuel management there are remapped ecus, megasquirt, Haltech, electromotive, microtech and a bunch more options they are just a little expensive.
06-12-2007, 03:57 PM
#136
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
Originally Posted by mayollo072R
So apparently this is a Honda forum, right? You are the assmunch who talk ---- this is homade turbo forum not honda turbo forum so I'm not visiting any Honduh forrum.
Secondly do you live in Zero gravity or something?
Originally Posted by mayollo072R
9psi with the stock fuel system, implosion man.
06-12-2007, 04:08 PM
#138
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
Originally Posted by gen4acclude
dick face you now have been pwned by to members so eat your own ---- bitch and get out of our forum
On another note:
Implosion, man!!1!
06-12-2007, 04:13 PM
#139
1.5 BAR
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 749
Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
Originally Posted by n3tsniper
Oh, and your honda civics dont have race heritage, for the idiot that said that. The NSX and other such cars do. But the civic doesnt.
Civics have been racing since the early 70's
Yes honda has cheep parts but again hum, the civic has been around since 88 or what not?! With the same b16 motor?! No ---- the parts are going to be cheeper. Hell the b18's werent popular untill maybe 3 years ago, when immagine this parts became redily avalible and cheep. No ----, right?
06-12-2007, 07:06 PM
#140
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 0
Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16
Originally Posted by klyph
Shut your ignorant ------- mouth.
Civics have been racing since the early 70'sNo, civics have been around since 72, fucktard. And the rest of your post is complete drivel.
Civics have been racing since the early 70'sNo, civics have been around since 72, fucktard. And the rest of your post is complete drivel.
I was waiting for someone to call this one.
