General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2007, 09:08 AM
  #121  
0.0 BAR
 
mayollo072R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

[quote=n3tsniper ]
That guy who says his auto-tragic car can run 9's in the qrt is a *** too, there is no way a car with nothing but forged rods and pistons will run that. You would have to run 20+ psi on a decently sized turbo. I

Nice response about this but I didnt like this quoted section specially when there is a video on this thread showing what im talking about the automatic street turbo Betad accent running 9s in a 1/4 mile. Read it again and yes it is possible. He is holding the worlds fastest automatic front wheel drive car record with 3 passes of 9.2#s. The engine block is stock. The only things changed on it are the ones mentioned. Check the videos.

IT'S AUTOMATIC and NITROUS and yeah a bad *** T4 turbo its on it. APE motors Hyundai Tiburon is running 10.7 and is also a 1-4 automatic. See its video on www.flyryde.com or at www.apemotors.com.

Here is another fast tib from PR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6xcErnYPpE this things are commonly seen around here.
mayollo072R is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:17 AM
  #122  
0.5 BAR
 
HondaTuner0487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 62
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

Word...

Can't Hyndai's and Honda's just get along? Where's the love at man.
HondaTuner0487 is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:22 AM
  #123  
0.0 BAR
 
mayollo072R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

Originally Posted by psycho_vince
Youra ------- moron and you need to get beat with a nightstick repeatedly untill death. You are so contradicting yourself that you make any point you try to make invalid. No one is going to listen, care, or give ANY respect to you untill get your ---- strait. First you talk ---- about auto trannies, then say the fastest hyundai is auto. Then you say its stock except motor and street legal, then contradict by saying it has slicks, and a wheelie bar, but also, I dont think Ive ever seen a car without a suspension, lol. Also, I wonder how nice it is to have a full cage to run 9s with a full interior too...***. Everyone is going to talk ---- and look down on you and your cars because you make idiots of yourselves with stupid ---- about whos car is faster than the others, and one car is ---- compared to others. GMs are ---- too (in my opinion) but its the best thing since sliced bread to another. Who gives a ----, anything can be fast, anything can be reliable, and anything can be ---- too. I dont care if its a turbo or v6 Festiva, a Metro with a swap, a big block Gremlin or a Pinto, or a Trans Am, Mustang, Corvette, ANYTHING! EVERYTHING CAN BE MADE TO BE FASTER THAN THE NEXT CAR!!!! GET THE ---- OVER IT AND END YOURSELF AND THIS THREAD!!! PERMABAN THIS BITCH!!!
U know *** cabron, the problem is that u don't analyze what you read. I never talked the all the car was stock I only explained the engine mods. If u read the post it does not talk about a stock transmission, a stock suspension or a stock chassis. I explained that it was a street legal car and there are pics (license plate on the pics can be seen u ***). Wheelie bar an parachute can be removed and so are the slicks.


READ the fukin POST. Im talking about the engine and yes a FWD stock auto trany of any car is a POS for modified High output engines. Don't tell me that you where such a MORRON and believe that the auto tranny in the 9s accent was stock. OMG! ur so freakin stupid pendejo! How could u think something like that? :1 Eres un Collera.

For whoever is asking in this thread for permanent bans ---- U and ---- this forum.
mayollo072R is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:25 AM
  #124  
0.0 BAR
 
mayollo072R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

Originally Posted by HondaTuner0487
Word...

Can't Hyndai's and Honda's just get along? Where's the love at man.
Ask that to Honda guys, they are always bashing our cars. We are defending ourselfs of people that just talked ---- whitout knowing a damn. U don't see hyundai guys visiting honda forums to talk ----.
mayollo072R is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 12:42 PM
  #126  
3.0 BAR
 
gen4acclude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,623
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

hay mayo man shut ur trap if thats the car i think it is it from oregon and its slow as ---- was beat by a d15 pushin 8 psi
gen4acclude is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:11 PM
  #127  
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
 
d-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 713
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

Why the ---- would you put a parashute on a show car with full interior? Something sounds fishy here.
d-man is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:13 PM
  #128  
0.0 BAR
 
jinxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

Originally Posted by n3tsniper
wait, now how does air flow make torque?! I was always prettys sure that it was mainly due to rod stroke, I could be wrong. But uhm, The thing that pissed me off is the fact that everyone is like "oh hyundai is ----" which its not. You guys are all pregidice against anything that isnt a honda which is apparent. Yes parts are over priced but look at the age difference in the companies. Oh, and your honda civics dont have race heritage, for the idiot that said that. The NSX and other such cars do. But the civic doesnt.

Im not here to brag or gloat, but honestly your all idiots for saying that hyundais are knock off hondas, two head flow would only increase torque, three I really dont need to explain myself. Because your probably one of those people who has a rhb5 turbo off of a ford probe or mazda 626 turbo. Runing an FMU because your too dumb to buy the chipping kit for your ecu and wouldnt know how to tune it even if you did.
torque is not just a product of stroke and bore size, you need intake velocity as well and balancing the pressure differences between the intake/exhaust manifold at x rpm and x cfm's flowing through the head. The only 2.0's I've driven that make torque are the ABA VW engines. The closed deck, cast iron 2.0 dohc in my celica from 1987, doesn't make ---- for torque and produces a majority of its power over 3800 rpms due to cylinder head, intake manifold and exhaust manifold design. I'm not going to try to explain this to you because it takes some spatial intelligence and you're probably just going to argue with me about it. I've driven beta elantras, they don't make torque, get over yourself.

jinxy is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 02:40 PM
  #129  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

hyundais and gay slow gook made peices of ----.

where is the arguement lol
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 02:55 PM
  #130  
0.0 BAR
 
mayollo072R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Default Re: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16

Originally Posted by gen4acclude
hay mayo man shut ur trap if thats the car i think it is it from oregon and its slow as ---- was beat by a d15 pushin 8 psi
Im in PR not Oregon and there is no other Orange elantra in all the US.
mayollo072R is offline  


Quick Reply: Near stock elantra vs turbo d16



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.