HomemadeTurbo - DIY Turbo Forum

HomemadeTurbo - DIY Turbo Forum (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/)
-   Forced Induction (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forced-induction-7/)
-   -   Rear mount turbo CRX (https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forced-induction-7/rear-mount-turbo-crx-68709/)

QikEnuF 10-20-2006 05:51 PM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 
Nope, they don't sell kits. It is just a site detailing the process of doing a home made remote mount turbo, all custom stuff, piping, etc. No kits, he just has a few spare oil pumps for sale.

noboostedEGo 10-20-2006 05:54 PM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 
I don't see why this setup seems to piss so many people off. They obviously work, the results show that. So if it works, what's the big deal? Ok, so there's more piping and you need to run another oil pump. I think it sounds sort of cool actually, I've seen a few cars with it, and they all look pretty solid.

Yes, I know humans are creatures of habit, and generally closed-minded, but if it works it works right?

Zeniceguycrx 10-20-2006 09:21 PM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 
Did anyone notice that the side seat mount turbo setup car is weight reducted to ---- but he still has the deck in?

Atticus 10-20-2006 10:35 PM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 
lol ya when you have a turbo spooling beside your head you need something else to listen to

Tom-Guy 10-20-2006 11:20 PM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 
Those two side mount turbos are too small to be able to hear if you tried. :S

0b00st0 10-20-2006 11:21 PM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 

Originally Posted by ej1 wilcox
People typically use mechanical pumps to pump the oil back up and then into the oil fill cap. Also, STS uses a hobbs switch by the pump wired to a warning light that will alert you if the turbo starves for oil. Here's a pic of the oil return on an STS vehicle. It drains the oil onto the top of the engine. It must be nice to not have to tap the oil pan!
http://i.b5z.net/i/u/1473169/i/gto/gtooil_small.jpg


This is about as smart as putting your cock in a meat grinder.


ALL OIL MUST RETURN TO THE OIL PAN SO THAT IS GOES THROUGH THE FILTER.



B16CRXT 10-21-2006 12:30 AM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 
I have decided, I'm going to do the 2.0L ls/vtec with the T3 .48/.60 rmt. First I have to build the ls/vtec around n/a for a while just for my peace of mind. Then start project rmt.

I'm not looking for a lot of power. Anything over 250whp, I'll be happy with. Hell, I should get close to that with the 2.0L ls/vtecbuilt with a lot of headwork (which it will have) and an itr valve train/cams.

Well, I'm ------- drunk. I'm goin to bed. Oh yea, I do suck at reading. lol. My attention span and memory are about 30% of what they used to be when I cared. lol

mike94se 10-21-2006 12:46 AM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 

Originally Posted by QikEnuF
Why?

Cause he's gonna go back to posting the GM 4.3 all over again :X

QikEnuF 10-21-2006 03:16 AM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 
2.8/3.1 Gen II and 3100/3400 Gen III v6's are 60* motors, unlike the 4.3, so no real similarity. But good on him if he brings it up.

Henry

BLAAST 10-21-2006 08:27 AM

Re: Rear mount turbo CRX
 

Originally Posted by B16CRXT

I'm not looking for a lot of power. Anything over 250whp, I'll be happy with. Hell, I should get close to that with the 2.0L ls/vtecbuilt with a lot of headwork (which it will have) and an itr valve train/cams.

250 WHP is stretching the hell out of the t3 48/60. (mercedes wheel or not)

but i am thinking now.... Since the turbo is that far away from the engine, maybe that 0.48 stage 1 turbine would still be Ok and just the compressor needs to be beefed up, resulting in an hybrid that is more disproportionate that I would normally consider acceptable on a conventional setup. somthing like a stage1, .48/.70, t3/T04E or something like that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands