My dyno numbers.... untuned.
12-07-2003, 09:52 AM
#31
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 42
Re:My dyno numbers.... untuned.
therma Im in Hampton holla at me we can get up and chill whatever talk car ---- and I need help with installation of turbo kit on 88-91dx I think. Im still thinking on which car too get. Im goin too buy civic and then slap turbo on it but I want low mileage car what do you guys think 92-95 or 88-91 I want a crx hf but I would have too swap motor and dont want too do that plus its hard too find low mileage 88-91 so i was thinking Ill probably end up getting 92-95 but I really like the 88-91's the best anyways shout me a message peace
12-07-2003, 07:59 PM
#32
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,194
Re:My dyno numbers.... untuned.
Almost every bike motor makes much more than 100hp/l and none of them are equipped with variable valve control. 2000psi really saw my point. It's cool technology in a way but I was just commenting on the "VTEC power increase". Dr.Boost... it's a fact that normal engines with wild cams get bad emissions and fuel economy in part-throttle is really bad. Johnyquest... I don't even know what you're saying, lots of engines have two cams, it's called DOHC on an inline motor and has proven better reliability on high-rpm applications.
D16tuner... of course peak power wouldn't be any higher with just the high cam, because peak power happens where the high cam is in use anyway. And explain how a vtec-equipped engine is capable of more power than the same engine without vtec...
I didn't intend to start a flamewar here... sorry.
And yes, those dyno graphs are indeed odd, the power and torque curves should cross at 5252RPM using the american system (horsepower and ft-lbs) where power is torque times rpm divided by 5252
D16tuner... of course peak power wouldn't be any higher with just the high cam, because peak power happens where the high cam is in use anyway. And explain how a vtec-equipped engine is capable of more power than the same engine without vtec...
I didn't intend to start a flamewar here... sorry.
And yes, those dyno graphs are indeed odd, the power and torque curves should cross at 5252RPM using the american system (horsepower and ft-lbs) where power is torque times rpm divided by 5252
12-07-2003, 08:15 PM
#33
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re:My dyno numbers.... untuned.
Originally Posted by baldur
It's cool technology in a way but I was just commenting on the "VTEC power increase". Dr.Boost... it's a fact that normal engines with wild cams get bad emissions and fuel economy in part-throttle is really bad.
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
Well that makes more sense. I still don't see what his point was in the first place.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
12-07-2003, 09:15 PM
#34
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 310
Re:My dyno numbers.... untuned.
I have A 2000 GSR...It's N/A at this time.It is suprisingly fast & gets decent fuel mileage. I feel it has a lot to do with V-TEC. Mine switches at 6000 RPM. I know it's switching late in the RPM range(factory setting) But from 6 to 8...it screams. It's gotten me by for almost 4 yrs now. With all that said, One still can not deny the irresistable desire for more power....Enter boost.
12-08-2003, 10:51 PM
#35
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 463
Re:My dyno numbers.... untuned.
Originally Posted by Xplocivic
Thermal, you live in VA Beach? I lived there about 6 months ago. Abacus is a ripoff cause they are in deep with Millenium. Bunch of tards that think they know it all. They wanted $600 to rewire my friends harness for his K20A to SR20DET swap. He got it done elsewhere for $75. But I know what you mean about there being nowhere else to go.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hebijake
General Discussion
26
05-18-2006 08:25 PM
