Manifold for my R6
06-08-2007, 04:48 PM
#31
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Re: Manifold for my R6
Originally Posted by theprophet36
Like I said it would be easier to do the v-stacks than it would be not to do them with my plenum design. I do know they work well with N/A as I had them on my last R6. That being said, would they not help atomize the water/meth? Can anyone think of anything negative from using them? Thoughts....
Go the cheaper route...Cant really think of how stacks could hurt your setup...---- its gonna fly either way do whatever you want. :P
06-08-2007, 10:09 PM
#32
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: Manifold for my R6
Atomization is an at idle problem.
The BRMS car runs large poor stomizing Precision 880cc injectors that have to be idled a half point rich to keep things smooth, 585 whp @ 27 psi, and whatever duty it was at the time (I can't recall) worked out to a 0.39 bsfc - for a boosted 1.8 liter. Nothing wrong with the burn on that setup! THe turbulent air exiting the turbo under power is going to forcibly atomize the fuel for you, no worries.
The BRMS car runs large poor stomizing Precision 880cc injectors that have to be idled a half point rich to keep things smooth, 585 whp @ 27 psi, and whatever duty it was at the time (I can't recall) worked out to a 0.39 bsfc - for a boosted 1.8 liter. Nothing wrong with the burn on that setup! THe turbulent air exiting the turbo under power is going to forcibly atomize the fuel for you, no worries.
06-09-2007, 01:31 AM
#33
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 345
Re: Manifold for my R6
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
That's the sort of regurgitated statement I hear a lot coming some fuckface wanabe know-it-all who thinks he's right. The truth is that CR has no effect on spool time, but internet racers with "Knowledgeabilites" like to argue. Most arguers have never tried what they are talking about, and even more annoying are the ones who tried their ideas out on their personal car but misperceive the reasons why their car performs as it does because they lack perspective based on extensive experience.
btw it was the biggest waste of money i ever invested into. N/a rotary + boost = fire. Pulsation damper owned = Me.
06-09-2007, 10:02 AM
#35
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Re: Manifold for my R6
Originally Posted by creativepunka
N/A bridge port rotary + boost=410whp.
Well thats how mine turned out. C/R in a rotary are nothing to do with C/R in piston engine. We boost hi comp rotas all the time.
Well thats how mine turned out. C/R in a rotary are nothing to do with C/R in piston engine. We boost hi comp rotas all the time.
06-09-2007, 10:39 AM
#36
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: Manifold for my R6
Originally Posted by blade8r
you know what i'm going to have to disagree. personal experiance tells me otherwise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bearboy80
Forced Induction
9
11-09-2003 01:01 PM
