>> CAM. VS. TURBOCAMS <<
03-20-2007, 01:44 AM
#11
0.5 BAR
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 151
Re: >> CAM. VS. TURBO <<
Originally Posted by SDRAWKCAB
You obviously know what your talking about 
there are cams made for turbo, supercharged and nitrous applications.
and they make a big diff
as for using n/a cams for a boosted app
thats like using 4/10 gears in a camaro for diving on the high way.
THAT DOSE NOT MAKE SENSE!
there are cams made for turbo, supercharged and nitrous applications.
and they make a big diff
as for using n/a cams for a boosted app
thats like using 4/10 gears in a camaro for diving on the high way.
THAT DOSE NOT MAKE SENSE!
03-22-2007, 12:47 PM
#13
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,618
Re: >> CAM. VS. TURBOCAMS <<
what about a 272 delta regrind in an a6?
cuz thats whats in my build right now, i changed my mind and went turbo half way through the build.
is that going to be bad? i was always under the impression stock cams suck.
cuz thats whats in my build right now, i changed my mind and went turbo half way through the build.
is that going to be bad? i was always under the impression stock cams suck.
03-26-2007, 12:38 AM
#16
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 723
Re: >> CAM. VS. TURBOCAMS <<
In general, turbo cams (high lift, low duration) work **** for turbo apps. But with hondas, cams with high lift also work ****. ITR cams make much more than stock b16/gsr cams, regardless of boost pressure. But really we're talking about stock vs. almost any cam that wasn't intended for FI on a honda. The fact is high lift, high duration cams on turbo hondas will still make more power over stock. They also seem to show some extra gains from dialing out overlap with cam gears, but sometimes (rarely) the dyno suggests otherwise.
I highly doubt that book you're reading covers FI hondas in specific. I think I've also read in a book promiscuous sex will lead to getting multiple STD's and 8% chance of knocking the girl up. So far I've beat the odds 100%, so we can assume books aren't alway FTW... :1
I highly doubt that book you're reading covers FI hondas in specific. I think I've also read in a book promiscuous sex will lead to getting multiple STD's and 8% chance of knocking the girl up. So far I've beat the odds 100%, so we can assume books aren't alway FTW... :1
03-26-2007, 12:40 AM
#17
0.5 BAR
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 151
Re: >> CAM. VS. TURBOCAMS <<
Originally Posted by HiProfile
In general, turbo cams (high lift, low duration) work **** for turbo apps. But with hondas, cams with high lift also work ****. ITR cams make much more than stock b16/gsr cams, regardless of boost pressure. But really we're talking about stock vs. almost any cam that wasn't intended for FI on a honda. The fact is high lift, high duration cams on turbo hondas will still make more power over stock. They also seem to show some extra gains from dialing out overlap with cam gears, but sometimes (rarely) the dyno suggests otherwise.
I highly doubt that book you're reading covers FI hondas in specific. I think I've also read in a book promiscuous sex will lead to getting multiple STD's and 8% chance of knocking the girl up. So far I've beat the odds 100%, so we can assume books aren't alway FTW... :1
I highly doubt that book you're reading covers FI hondas in specific. I think I've also read in a book promiscuous sex will lead to getting multiple STD's and 8% chance of knocking the girl up. So far I've beat the odds 100%, so we can assume books aren't alway FTW... :1
Well, i guess this is one of those times that aucutal expirence > theory. I learned something new.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
d16u7nh
Turbo Parts For Sale
15
06-29-2003 03:51 PM
