Engine Management eCtune , Crome , AFC , FMU , Zdyne , Hondata , EMS , TE , Uberdata Anything to control your fuel, spark needs!

Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2004, 11:00 AM
  #1  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
rudebwoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,217
Default Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

Is it possible to have uberdata datalogging running at the same time as the Zeitronix datologging? will they interfere with each other, or will the work fine? it will be in 2 different windows right?

the uberdata datalogger I plan to use is USB port.
the Zeitronix datalogger is serial port.
the Laptop I use is windows XP

has anyone have experience with these?
rudebwoy is offline  
Old 12-19-2004, 03:15 PM
  #2  
3.0 BAR
 
leed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,830
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

If your logging through two diff ports, it should be just fine. Every laptop is diff. though. Mine took quite awhile to get it to work with two diff. ports at the same time. If it doesnt work right away, just start shuffling port assignments around in windows.

I wouldnt worry about it.

Dave
leed is offline  
Old 12-19-2004, 04:51 PM
  #3  
3.0 BAR
 
Chris Harris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,449
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

Why do you need to log with both dataloggers?
Chris Harris is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 08:11 AM
  #4  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
rudebwoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,217
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

I have both, so why not? since uberdata datalog reads the ecu, and wideband reads the o2 it would give an idea of what both is seeing, at the same time... plus I plan to use my stock o2 sensor for the ecu, and the zeitronix for the datalogging, I will use the zeitronix's narroband output for uberdata datalogging, and factory o2 for the ecu
rudebwoy is offline  
Old 12-20-2004, 10:21 AM
  #5  
3.0 BAR
 
Chris Harris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,449
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

Originally Posted by rudebwoy
I have both, so why not? since uberdata datalog reads the ecu, and wideband reads the o2 it would give an idea of what both is seeing, at the same time... plus I plan to use my stock o2 sensor for the ecu, and the zeitronix for the datalogging, I will use the zeitronix's narroband output for uberdata datalogging, and factory o2 for the ecu
screw that, disable closed loop in UD and use the narrowband output to send a WB signal to your ECU and log that with Uberdata. You only need to use one logger that way and logging from the ECU is the most accurate way to do this.
Chris Harris is offline  
Old 12-21-2004, 11:02 AM
  #6  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
rudebwoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,217
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging


screw that, disable closed loop in UD and use the narrowband output to send a WB signal to your ECU and log that with Uberdata. You only need to use one logger that way and logging from the ECU is the most accurate way to do this.
but that means I would have to disconnect the factory o2 right? I want to keep it installed, unless its required to disconnect factory o2 to hookup wideband o2. I havent got to see my wideband instructions, so I dont know what is required, all I have pictures my wife emailed of the parts I ordered while still deployed, so I'm just trying to see whats my optins
rudebwoy is offline  
Old 12-21-2004, 11:09 AM
  #7  
3.0 BAR
 
biggmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,075
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

run them both and if they are the same values in each program then just use UD datalogging
biggmike is offline  
Old 12-21-2004, 02:28 PM
  #8  
3.0 BAR
 
Chris Harris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,449
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

Originally Posted by biggmike
run them both and if they are the same values in each program then just use UD datalogging
huh?

A wideband has a 0-5 volt read out, a narrowband has a 0-1 volt...thus the reason a narrowband is ---- to tune with and wideband is the best to tune with...not to mention that each has a very different curve and accuracy.

Leave the stock o2 in your downpipe if you want, doesnt matter much...have the wideband installed in a separate bung. Use the wideband analog output from the Zeitronix and run it to the pin on your OBD1 ECU (forget the pin #, well explained on the UD forums though)

When you are done tuning...just hook the stock o2 backup to the ECu like it was.
Chris Harris is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 10:28 AM
  #9  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
rudebwoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,217
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

Originally Posted by xenocron
Originally Posted by biggmike
run them both and if they are the same values in each program then just use UD datalogging
huh?

A wideband has a 0-5 volt read out, a narrowband has a 0-1 volt...thus the reason a narrowband is ---- to tune with and wideband is the best to tune with...not to mention that each has a very different curve and accuracy.

Leave the stock o2 in your downpipe if you want, doesnt matter much...have the wideband installed in a separate bung. Use the wideband analog output from the Zeitronix and run it to the pin on your OBD1 ECU (forget the pin #, well explained on the UD forums though)

When you are done tuning...just hook the stock o2 backup to the ECu like it was.
thanks! that makes more sense. I hate CEL so I want to do my best to prevent getting one for O2 circuit.
rudebwoy is offline  
Old 12-30-2004, 08:29 AM
  #10  
3.0 BAR
 
projekteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,058
Default Re:Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging

Originally Posted by xenocron
Originally Posted by biggmike
run them both and if they are the same values in each program then just use UD datalogging
huh?

A wideband has a 0-5 volt read out, a narrowband has a 0-1 volt...thus the reason a narrowband is ---- to tune with and wideband is the best to tune with...not to mention that each has a very different curve and accuracy.

i think he was saying compare the zeitronix datalogger values to the uber data logger values and go off which you think is more accurate. i personally like to data log from uber b/c uber is reading what the ecu is actually seeing, which is what matters b/c the ecu is going to be changine the a/f accordingly, not the zeit data logger. it's kind of like someone inside a building looking outside saying 'damn, it looks cold as hell out there', and then you have a guy actually standing outside, which would you trust for a more accurate answer?
projekteg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zebvaj
Engine Management
4
04-13-2006 12:22 PM
hatchdx-si
Engine Management
2
08-22-2005 08:01 PM
T-RO
Turbo Parts For Sale
6
08-20-2005 08:39 AM
abakedpotato
Engine Management
5
05-16-2005 04:34 PM
green91
Engine Management
22
10-08-2004 10:32 PM



Quick Reply: Uberdata, Zeitronix, Datalogging



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.