Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

the ignitor isn't the ignition coil.

its the ignition module.
180 buck new piece...

pretty soon its gonna die completly.

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

I would try another Dizzy if you have one on hand... before you start replacing ignitiors...

Jeff

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

IT's just strange that it worked fine to the minute that that I took the 1.5 out.. and ptu the 1.6 Mini in.
Fromt he moment I started new engine, it's done this. Hrm..

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

What are you running for fuel management?? Are you using ghettodyne?? Or just ecucontrol??

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

Well, uhm, EcuControl isn't fuel management.

I'm using my V-AFC for fuel..

My a/f gauge says it's not a fuel related issue, pressure, or otherwise..

I think we're ont he right track with the ignition issue, except it's weird that it would start only with the new motor.

And even so, I should run way rich when it happends because of the lack of fire.. soo.. who knows.. this sucks. :(

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

I have seen stranger things. I put a new head on my car and it seemed like everything went bad after that. )2 sensor was the first thing to go. After that the iacv valve and then the cap and rotor started acting up. You might be surprised as to how simple the problem is. Check the things you don't think it could be first.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

them two ignitors are interchangeable..
just take the one out and put it in the new one....

should take care of the problem.

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

this is probably really not likely, but maybe your plug wires are backwards?

I have done this so many ------- times its not funny...of course if nology at least made their plug wires different lengths it would be nice

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

check the damn revlimit setting on the afc. I bet thats most likely the problem.

Re:OK... 6000rpm rev limit!?
 

I think turboef9 is a bit smarter than that :-\