Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

why stroke an already long stroke engine? doesnt seem like a good idea to me

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

that is what i was thinking...






bone you know if the 171hp was at the crank or not ??

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

all that work when you could just get an LS for peanuts and actually have some torque...

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

read above......dynapak, small "heads" = high reading

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

i wish i knew what that ment

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

does the dynapak not load the engine or something?

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

is that the dyno that you just bolt up to the hubs. cant remember.

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

Is a superior dyno. Its able to hold rpm and partial throttle tuning is key with this style dyno.




Has far has all reading high this is untrue I use to dyno at one that read lower than the local dynojet chassis dyno just churchs is a high reading dyno

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

depends on what size heads are used, and how much time is set for the pull.

set the time to 6, aka 5 seconds to make the rpm sweep, you get a low reading. set the time to say 15 and you'll get a decent reading.

BTW this is just my observation of Blundar doing pulls on a dynapak, medium heads.

Re: d16 stroker motor........
 

well, if more time is better then why dont all dyno's just use more time. are there advantages and dissadvanteges other than the quality of the reading?