Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

It's a shame that a good Toyota body to put those engines in is hard to come by, atleast where I live. What else can you put those motors in that is fairly inexpensive? Body wise that is... ( <5k )

I always wanted a Toyota :'(

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

car looks a lot better in those pictures except for all the holes in the front bumper.

ive always liked those cars and i almost bought one, but it wasn't going to keep the bumble bee motor

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

Stop making me want to get another 'Yota. :'(

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

same here, even if it isnt as fast as a honda i still want it because of the lack of shifting needed to accel

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

i raced out of these cars today, it was totally riced out. it was good for a laugh. what a peice of ----

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

English?

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

can you read it?

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

I know you're not the most literate Johnny in the apple cart, so why don't you re-read it and tell me what it means?

While you're at it, I'd like to see video of your Stang at the track, and third party verification that it does indeed get 50 mpg.

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

ANOTHER POINTLESS POST, JD TRYING TO GET THE POST COUNT UP AGAIN:(

Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
 

if you change out to one it makes sense