turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
09-11-2007, 01:55 PM
#91
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by TTC
Thats alot of ic dont u think?
09-11-2007, 02:19 PM
#92
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
hmmm, dont forget airflow. it wont be the smoothest trying to distribute along that thin long end tank.
having said that, i assumed it was the radiator. what are the core cross sections and end tanks like? thats what is key, that and overall open cross sectional area. the core should be about 25% - 33% larger than the piping to allow for friction from the excessive boundary layer, and also to let it slow down as it passes through.
having said that, i assumed it was the radiator. what are the core cross sections and end tanks like? thats what is key, that and overall open cross sectional area. the core should be about 25% - 33% larger than the piping to allow for friction from the excessive boundary layer, and also to let it slow down as it passes through.
09-11-2007, 03:55 PM
#93
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
hmmm, dont forget airflow. it wont be the smoothest trying to distribute along that thin long end tank.
having said that, i assumed it was the radiator. what are the core cross sections and end tanks like? thats what is key, that and overall open cross sectional area. the core should be about 25% - 33% larger than the piping to allow for friction from the excessive boundary layer, and also to let it slow down as it passes through.
having said that, i assumed it was the radiator. what are the core cross sections and end tanks like? thats what is key, that and overall open cross sectional area. the core should be about 25% - 33% larger than the piping to allow for friction from the excessive boundary layer, and also to let it slow down as it passes through.
I got an intercooler for free and wanted to try it out. if it doesnt work then im out NOTHING. if it works fine, than all the better. ive been wanting to fill all of these gaudy holes in my front bumper for 2 years now, 2 birds with one stone. ill be using a proper EMS so ill be able to compare IATs if it comes down to me splitting hairs between an SSAC intercooler and this massive thing.
09-11-2007, 04:50 PM
#94
0.5 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 137
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
That's a very nice car and nice setup. Glad the crooked intercooler is gone. Drift and quarter mile machine.
I'm pleased, almost as pleased as I would be jacking off into a bag of cheetos and giving it to a bum. Then watching him eat his cheesy skeet covered treat from a distance.
I'm pleased, almost as pleased as I would be jacking off into a bag of cheetos and giving it to a bum. Then watching him eat his cheesy skeet covered treat from a distance.
09-11-2007, 05:08 PM
#95
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
i... uh... ummm... thanks?
haha the car is going together in bits and pieces as i see fit. the focus is performance over aesthetics... with a little frugal thrown in there. i got the trd front lip mounted the other night. when i get some more ---- done ill update.
haha the car is going together in bits and pieces as i see fit. the focus is performance over aesthetics... with a little frugal thrown in there. i got the trd front lip mounted the other night. when i get some more ---- done ill update.
09-12-2007, 11:14 AM
#100
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Re: turbo4age 5.5psi no tune vs. pretty solid 20v 4age
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Fred fails to understand - as usual - how an IC works.
gimme a break...
