Turbo in the rear of the car
#22
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
Originally Posted by sccaeg
Someone needs to PM him on ebay and ask him how he did it, or create a UN on HMT and put a write up on it so we can all flame him
#23
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
This guy's pretty shady.. I asked him about the setup, he said:
" Sorry, it's proprietary, it's something my company does so I can't share that info. But if you get the car you'll see how it all goes together.
thanks!
joe "
In other words, he doesnt know :P
" Sorry, it's proprietary, it's something my company does so I can't share that info. But if you get the car you'll see how it all goes together.
thanks!
joe "
In other words, he doesnt know :P
#24
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
it's unconventional, but not stupid, nevermind the added spool time, but just think of the benifits,
pros:
-you don't have to touch your motor, just leave it stock and add charge pipes
-engine bay doesn't get hot, neither does the turbo
-lower intake temps.
-you don't need to run coolant lines
-no messy/dangerous oil lines to run to the motor, all you have to do is use a little pump and a resevoir.
-ultimate sleeper effect.
-basicly a bolt on, just make an adapter to weld to your exhaust.
Cons:
-if you use mandrel bends, it might cost you alot,(well you'd probly end up using roughly the same amount of bends on a front mounter turbo with a intercooler)
-water could get in the turbo(but thats the same with a front mounted one, you could improve on his design by placing the air filter up higher)
-longer spool times, althoug it can't be that bad.
-you have to make a oil pump system(i don't know if thats a con, but it might be)
if you ask me, it would be easier and cheaper to make a adapter to mount that baby on your sotck exhaust right behing the rear wheels, then use a whole bunch of home vacume house for charge pipes, and a small pump witha resvoir for oil. you could make kits that complete idiots could install in seconds, with out removing anything on the car.
pros:
-you don't have to touch your motor, just leave it stock and add charge pipes
-engine bay doesn't get hot, neither does the turbo
-lower intake temps.
-you don't need to run coolant lines
-no messy/dangerous oil lines to run to the motor, all you have to do is use a little pump and a resevoir.
-ultimate sleeper effect.
-basicly a bolt on, just make an adapter to weld to your exhaust.
Cons:
-if you use mandrel bends, it might cost you alot,(well you'd probly end up using roughly the same amount of bends on a front mounter turbo with a intercooler)
-water could get in the turbo(but thats the same with a front mounted one, you could improve on his design by placing the air filter up higher)
-longer spool times, althoug it can't be that bad.
-you have to make a oil pump system(i don't know if thats a con, but it might be)
if you ask me, it would be easier and cheaper to make a adapter to mount that baby on your sotck exhaust right behing the rear wheels, then use a whole bunch of home vacume house for charge pipes, and a small pump witha resvoir for oil. you could make kits that complete idiots could install in seconds, with out removing anything on the car.
#25
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
heres that Camaro...its really not that much extra piping
http://www.ststurbo.com/i/u/1473169/...rshot2_ezr.jpg
http://www.ststurbo.com/i/u/1473169/...underneath.jpg
http://www.ststurbo.com/i/u/1473169/...rshot2_ezr.jpg
http://www.ststurbo.com/i/u/1473169/...underneath.jpg
#26
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
I have seen this done before and it DOES NOT WORK! With the turbo at the rear the exhaust gases have cooled and slowed to the point that the turbo makes no boost. It spins and makes noise but thats it. Think about all the factory turbo cars and diesel trucks, they all have the turbo right up on the engine. Its there for a reason, thats where the exhaust gases are the hottest and are moving the fastest. You need that to spool the turbo. In short, dont waste your time on this you wont like it.
#27
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
Originally Posted by SinisterCRX
This guy's pretty shady.. I asked him about the setup, he said:
" Sorry, it's proprietary, it's something my company does so I can't share that info. But if you get the car you'll see how it all goes together.
thanks!
joe "
In other words, he doesnt know :P
" Sorry, it's proprietary, it's something my company does so I can't share that info. But if you get the car you'll see how it all goes together.
thanks!
joe "
In other words, he doesnt know :P
#29
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
Wow! That's a retarded idea. Customcoach is right. You need hot expanding exhaust to spool a turbo to actually create boost. It may work slightly at high rpms but is extremely inefficient. Not to mention a hazard hanging under there. Who's idea was that? That's just a demolished turbo waiting to happen. Different? Yes. Worthwhile? No.
#30
Re:Turbo in the rear of the car
Originally Posted by DA-MAX
heres that Camaro...its really not that much extra piping
Just imagine how much longer the charge pipes would have to be in order to make it to an intercooler than to the throttle body. Its a shitload more piping than what is necessary. Its not an efficient setup, the oil temps are probably through the roof, and like he said that he was only running 4psi thats probably becuase thats all it can spool after the pressure drop of trying to fill miles of piping.