General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Turbo in the rear of the car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2004, 01:48 PM
  #21  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
SkunT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

Someone needs to PM him on ebay and ask him how he did it, or create a UN on HMT and put a write up on it so we can all flame him
SkunT is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 04:24 PM
  #22  
0.0 BAR
 
HondaTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

Originally Posted by sccaeg
Someone needs to PM him on ebay and ask him how he did it, or create a UN on HMT and put a write up on it so we can all flame him
I'll do that now, since I am the highest bidder :P
HondaTuner is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 09:25 PM
  #23  
0.0 BAR
 
HondaTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

This guy's pretty shady.. I asked him about the setup, he said:

" Sorry, it's proprietary, it's something my company does so I can't share that info. But if you get the car you'll see how it all goes together.
thanks!
joe "

In other words, he doesnt know :P
HondaTuner is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 11:28 PM
  #24  
0.0 BAR
 
Owned's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 49
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

it's unconventional, but not stupid, nevermind the added spool time, but just think of the benifits,

pros:

-you don't have to touch your motor, just leave it stock and add charge pipes
-engine bay doesn't get hot, neither does the turbo
-lower intake temps.
-you don't need to run coolant lines
-no messy/dangerous oil lines to run to the motor, all you have to do is use a little pump and a resevoir.
-ultimate sleeper effect.
-basicly a bolt on, just make an adapter to weld to your exhaust.

Cons:
-if you use mandrel bends, it might cost you alot,(well you'd probly end up using roughly the same amount of bends on a front mounter turbo with a intercooler)
-water could get in the turbo(but thats the same with a front mounted one, you could improve on his design by placing the air filter up higher)
-longer spool times, althoug it can't be that bad.
-you have to make a oil pump system(i don't know if thats a con, but it might be)


if you ask me, it would be easier and cheaper to make a adapter to mount that baby on your sotck exhaust right behing the rear wheels, then use a whole bunch of home vacume house for charge pipes, and a small pump witha resvoir for oil. you could make kits that complete idiots could install in seconds, with out removing anything on the car.

Owned is offline  
Old 06-08-2004, 07:50 AM
  #25  
1.5 BAR
 
DA-MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 886
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

heres that Camaro...its really not that much extra piping

http://www.ststurbo.com/i/u/1473169/...rshot2_ezr.jpg
http://www.ststurbo.com/i/u/1473169/...underneath.jpg
DA-MAX is offline  
Old 06-08-2004, 08:02 AM
  #26  
1.5 BAR
 
customcoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 828
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

I have seen this done before and it DOES NOT WORK! With the turbo at the rear the exhaust gases have cooled and slowed to the point that the turbo makes no boost. It spins and makes noise but thats it. Think about all the factory turbo cars and diesel trucks, they all have the turbo right up on the engine. Its there for a reason, thats where the exhaust gases are the hottest and are moving the fastest. You need that to spool the turbo. In short, dont waste your time on this you wont like it.
customcoach is offline  
Old 06-08-2004, 08:03 AM
  #27  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
SkunT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

Originally Posted by SinisterCRX
This guy's pretty shady.. I asked him about the setup, he said:

" Sorry, it's proprietary, it's something my company does so I can't share that info. But if you get the car you'll see how it all goes together.
thanks!
joe "

In other words, he doesnt know :P
I think it could be set-up to run, pretty decent and someone probably made the kit when they were drunk or something like that. It just doesnt seem all that normal. that camaro is pretty awsome. It would be something totally different. I wouldnt personally do it, but hey, more power to them.
SkunT is offline  
Old 06-08-2004, 09:47 AM
  #28  
0.0 BAR
 
HondaTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

Seriously.. personally, if you're going to do that, move it farther up the exhaust. I think it would spool much faster than where its located now.
HondaTuner is offline  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:15 AM
  #29  
0.5 BAR
 
WhiteTeg24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 187
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

Wow! That's a retarded idea. Customcoach is right. You need hot expanding exhaust to spool a turbo to actually create boost. It may work slightly at high rpms but is extremely inefficient. Not to mention a hazard hanging under there. Who's idea was that? That's just a demolished turbo waiting to happen. Different? Yes. Worthwhile? No.
WhiteTeg24 is offline  
Old 06-08-2004, 11:20 AM
  #30  
0.0 BAR
 
Reddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re:Turbo in the rear of the car

Originally Posted by DA-MAX
heres that Camaro...its really not that much extra piping

Just imagine how much longer the charge pipes would have to be in order to make it to an intercooler than to the throttle body. Its a shitload more piping than what is necessary. Its not an efficient setup, the oil temps are probably through the roof, and like he said that he was only running 4psi thats probably becuase thats all it can spool after the pressure drop of trying to fill miles of piping.
Reddy is offline  


Quick Reply: Turbo in the rear of the car



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.