Short race video, what do you think (vid inside)
#21
Re: Short race video, what do you think (vid inside)
For a 1.6L na motor 160hp is not bad , its a good enough base to start getting power from it ( turbo etc )
How many other 1.6L na engines produce around the 160HP mark
Im not saying 160HP is power at all , *** no.
For a 1.6L na its good
How many other 1.6L na engines produce around the 160HP mark
Im not saying 160HP is power at all , *** no.
For a 1.6L na its good
#25
Re: Short race video, what do you think (vid inside)
Well there was a train infront of us, and I knew the kid was going to take off and try to keep up. I've got some more videos that are a bit longer that I've posted before...but here are the links again incase anybody is bored and wants to hear some N/A raspy goodness.
http://media.putfile.com/B16-CRX-compilation
http://media.putfile.com/danvsjim
http://media.putfile.com/meet-movie
I guess it helps that my car is a < 2000lb HF. This summer I'm hoping to get a full time job after I graduate high school and either boost it or do a few N/A modifications and buy a newer car next year once I save up a good down payment. I only paid $2500 for the car with the B16 but I've put $1000 or more into maintenance and repairs with still more to go.
http://media.putfile.com/B16-CRX-compilation
http://media.putfile.com/danvsjim
http://media.putfile.com/meet-movie
I guess it helps that my car is a < 2000lb HF. This summer I'm hoping to get a full time job after I graduate high school and either boost it or do a few N/A modifications and buy a newer car next year once I save up a good down payment. I only paid $2500 for the car with the B16 but I've put $1000 or more into maintenance and repairs with still more to go.
#27
Re: Short race video, what do you think (vid inside)
Originally Posted by random-strike
duno
but in the 80s oldsmobile had a na 4banger that made 180hp and good torque too
but in the 80s oldsmobile had a na 4banger that made 180hp and good torque too
#28
Re: Short race video, what do you think (vid inside)
Originally Posted by nonvtec
What was the displacement? it wasn't 1.8 and that 180 is probably at the crank.
2.3l
180 at the crank not sure on the tq but im sure its around 160 at the crank
it was the olds quad 442