xternal

For a 1.6L na motor 160hp is not bad , its a good enough base to start getting power from it ( turbo etc )
How many other 1.6L na engines produce around the 160HP mark

Im not saying 160HP is power at all , *** no.
For a 1.6L na its good

J-SMITH69

duno


but in the 80s oldsmobile had a na 4banger that made 180hp and good torque too

xternal

Ah ok never knew that one ..sweet

fourthgenhatch

damn that was really short, yeah it did look like you jumped the gun a bit, but you really didn't "race"

what did you get up to, like 55?

N1ghtM0nkey

Well there was a train infront of us, and I knew the kid was going to take off and try to keep up. I've got some more videos that are a bit longer that I've posted before...but here are the links again incase anybody is bored and wants to hear some N/A raspy goodness.

http://media.putfile.com/B16-CRX-compilation

http://media.putfile.com/danvsjim

http://media.putfile.com/meet-movie

I guess it helps that my car is a < 2000lb HF. This summer I'm hoping to get a full time job after I graduate high school and either boost it or do a few N/A modifications and buy a newer car next year once I save up a good down payment. I only paid $2500 for the car with the B16 but I've put $1000 or more into maintenance and repairs with still more to go.

90GSintegra

yah get ride of the duck in your muffler bro.

nonvtec

What was the displacement? it wasn't 1.8 and that 180 is probably at the crank.

J-SMITH69

you're right, i never said it was 1.6l

2.3l
180 at the crank not sure on the tq but im sure its around 160 at the crank

it was the olds quad 442

jecu

wow you beat a 4 door automatic heavy old caprice with 3 people in it, congrats

zex_cool

dont be a dick. DO YOU have any videos ??