General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2005, 06:42 PM
  #11  
3.0 BAR
 
Honda16hb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,082
Default Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!

Originally Posted by Spenser
according to this website.... there are some more mandates that might affect us further

http://www.alternet.org/story/11945/
wow, I had to quote you to say "we're not going to read that ----, tell us wtf is going on" in order to realize that if you just click on the link all of the important info is right there, not much reading to it.
Honda16hb is offline  
Old 06-24-2005, 06:50 PM
  #12  
1.5 BAR
 
NBLKID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,454
Default Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!

tubgirl strikes again
NBLKID is offline  
Old 06-24-2005, 08:54 PM
  #13  
1.0 BAR
 
spongerlbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 437
Default Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!

So America is going to police the internet..... this should be funny.
spongerlbc is offline  
Old 06-25-2005, 01:58 AM
  #14  
1.5 BAR
 
G2turbo_terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!

Originally Posted by Mista_Shrpnl
So anyway, what I'm gathering at this point is:
If Bill or Jim want to post some nudie pics, they themselves are required to keep records of every model depicted with proof of age, blah blah etc. You might think only the actual "producer" or creator of the **** is required to do this, but I've seen on several sites that the law included "secondary producers" which is defined as: "the term 'secondary producer' is defined to include anyone who posts a digital image on an internet site, under 75.1 (c)(2). Secondary producers are the ones who are now being required to maintain this information."
So lets get this straight. Kain wants to post some ****, is kain considerd a "secondary producer" who legally is required to have proof of models age? -OR- Overnight pop up pay site is re-selling/posting pics of some **** that is considerd the "secondary producer"?
G2turbo_terror is offline  
Old 06-25-2005, 03:44 AM
  #15  
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Mista_Shrpnl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 199
Default Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!

Originally Posted by G2turbo_terror
So lets get this straight. Kain wants to post some ****, is kain considerd a "secondary producer" who legally is required to have proof of models age?
Yep.

Republishing an erotic image - even if you're doing it simply for the purposes of criticism - requires you to keep the same age-verification records as the people who created that image.
Mista_Shrpnl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Erich
Forced Induction
31
09-30-2005 04:01 PM
idiot-stick
General Discussion
12
09-12-2005 05:10 PM
abakedpotato
General Discussion
2
04-07-2005 02:36 PM
SpankedYA!
General Discussion
17
07-07-2004 08:46 PM



Quick Reply: Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.