Nobody caught this? Internet Porn Ruling - bad news!
#11
Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!
Originally Posted by Spenser
according to this website.... there are some more mandates that might affect us further
http://www.alternet.org/story/11945/
http://www.alternet.org/story/11945/
#14
Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!
Originally Posted by Mista_Shrpnl
So anyway, what I'm gathering at this point is:
If Bill or Jim want to post some nudie pics, they themselves are required to keep records of every model depicted with proof of age, blah blah etc. You might think only the actual "producer" or creator of the **** is required to do this, but I've seen on several sites that the law included "secondary producers" which is defined as: "the term 'secondary producer' is defined to include anyone who posts a digital image on an internet site, under 75.1 (c)(2). Secondary producers are the ones who are now being required to maintain this information."
If Bill or Jim want to post some nudie pics, they themselves are required to keep records of every model depicted with proof of age, blah blah etc. You might think only the actual "producer" or creator of the **** is required to do this, but I've seen on several sites that the law included "secondary producers" which is defined as: "the term 'secondary producer' is defined to include anyone who posts a digital image on an internet site, under 75.1 (c)(2). Secondary producers are the ones who are now being required to maintain this information."
#15
Re: Nobody caught this? Internet **** Ruling - bad news!
Originally Posted by G2turbo_terror
So lets get this straight. Kain wants to post some ****, is kain considerd a "secondary producer" who legally is required to have proof of models age?
Republishing an erotic image - even if you're doing it simply for the purposes of criticism - requires you to keep the same age-verification records as the people who created that image.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
abakedpotato
General Discussion
2
04-07-2005 02:36 PM