RedCavz

obviously cost has everything to do with comparision...

hotrex

this thread hurts my eyes, johnny you get more ****** by the day

i

Smith-02

if random strike was president of gm, he would put the ls1, and ls2 into every car, get 50mpg, and charge no more than 20k for the car.

J-SMITH69

what part of ANY race don't you understand?

road course, drag

colbalt will destory it easier. rsx = TOO SLOWWWW

b16sellout

RSX would tear up a Cobalt on a road course, the stock tires on my car blow. It understeers like crazy, the LSD doesn't seem to make too much of a difference either.

J-SMITH69

rsx is too slow. and the handling difference is minimal

there is more to road racing than handling ability. thats why there is different classes

TorganFM

Power adder vs non power adder... sigh.

J-SMITH69

still costs less.

old quad4 engines had about ~200hp and 180200tq NA 4 banger in the late 80s. sameish hp much more tq. american engineering

f japan

Dr.Boost

No way, Johnny knows your car better than you and he knows how it handles better than you. Don't try to act like you know your car better than him. What are you thinking?? You just don't understand. :1
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

Dr.Boost

Ok, not everybody buys a car based on how fast it is in every aspect of racing. Jesus christ, who ------- cares?? :1
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote