A little story...
#41
Re:A little story...
Originally Posted by KCreXXX-bug
all i have to say is.....**** AND ---- ON AMERICAN CARS....i dont like them...never have never will....i maybe american....but i dont like there cars. anyone dont like what i say....---- em
#42
Re:A little story...
z28 camaros have 320hp. STOCK with the engine that CAME IN THE CAR.
why not put a big block 502 in the z28 camaro and say its faster than a crx hf with any engine you want too put in it.
can't compare non stock cars to other stock cars rofl.
why not put a big block 502 in the z28 camaro and say its faster than a crx hf with any engine you want too put in it.
can't compare non stock cars to other stock cars rofl.
#44
Re:A little story...
Originally Posted by random-strike
z28 camaros have 320hp. STOCK with the engine that CAME IN THE CAR.
why not put a big block 502 in the z28 camaro and say its faster than a crx hf with any engine you want too put in it.
can't compare non stock cars to other stock cars rofl.
why not put a big block 502 in the z28 camaro and say its faster than a crx hf with any engine you want too put in it.
can't compare non stock cars to other stock cars rofl.
All hell, just to add to the fire.
Inline 6 Supra (3.0 L)
320 BHP
6-speed
Price was $40,000 in 98.
22/28 MPG
Porsche 911 carerra (3.6 L) H-6
283 BHP
6-speed
$73,000 new.
Honda S2000 (2.0 L) I-4
240 BHP
6-speed
$32,000
Nizzan 350Z (3.5 L) V-6
287 BHP
6-speed
$30,000
Dodge SRT-4
205 BHP (2.4 L) I-4
5-speed
$20,000
Mitsubishi EVO 8 (2.0 L) I-4
271 BHP
5-speed
$28,987
Subaru WRX STI (2.5 L) H-4
300 BHP
6-speed
$32,000
Who says 6 cyl dont make hp?
I would rather have the supra than a new camaro or a vette.
There is a reason they dont make the camaro anymore. NO ONE WANTS IT!
#46
Re:A little story...
if i really wanted to be a jerk I could talk day in and out about the crap suspension that Chevy decided to put on the 80 camaros, but I won't... what a waste of time. Every car manufacturer has special attributes that they make - people keep comparing these high-displacement engines against small displacement engines. OF COURSE ITS NOT GOING TO RUN THE SAME...
Lets be really stupid, and compare the torque/horsepower ratings of an oil rig drill in the ocean... jesus it only has what? 8 turbos to propel the motor?
Come on... stop flaming on each other... a car is a car.
We should focus all this hate on Mcdonalds for making me fat.
Lets be really stupid, and compare the torque/horsepower ratings of an oil rig drill in the ocean... jesus it only has what? 8 turbos to propel the motor?
Come on... stop flaming on each other... a car is a car.
We should focus all this hate on Mcdonalds for making me fat.
#48
Re:A little story...
everyone knows inline 4s and 6s can make hp. but it takes a turbo/supercharger. that is obvious.
both type of engines V and inline have a place. but the whole reason i like bigger engines, is that they are so nice to cruise in. driving a gutless, even powerful inline engine (turbocharged) sucks, because to go up a hill you have to mash the gas and create boost. or worse yet shift down and mash the gas in a non boosted car to go up a hill. or start from a stoplight.
the reason inline 4cyl engines were ever created is to save gas, not be power plants. but newer v8s are becoming pretty effiecant, eg 405hp 400ft-lbs 19/28mpg
i would definatly agree that 80s camaros are ----. cause they are. everyone knows it. they are underpowered to say the least, lots of emissions controls and bullshit other things. i have no idea why they stop making camaros, but my guess is they will start making them again. i know lots of people like and want them, cause i see about 50 billion of them everyday. to put it this way, i see more 90+ camaros than integras. i see more SS camaros everyday than VTEC integras, no shitting. and this isn't in the BACKWOODS. this is the greater portland area. in the city
both type of engines V and inline have a place. but the whole reason i like bigger engines, is that they are so nice to cruise in. driving a gutless, even powerful inline engine (turbocharged) sucks, because to go up a hill you have to mash the gas and create boost. or worse yet shift down and mash the gas in a non boosted car to go up a hill. or start from a stoplight.
the reason inline 4cyl engines were ever created is to save gas, not be power plants. but newer v8s are becoming pretty effiecant, eg 405hp 400ft-lbs 19/28mpg
i would definatly agree that 80s camaros are ----. cause they are. everyone knows it. they are underpowered to say the least, lots of emissions controls and bullshit other things. i have no idea why they stop making camaros, but my guess is they will start making them again. i know lots of people like and want them, cause i see about 50 billion of them everyday. to put it this way, i see more 90+ camaros than integras. i see more SS camaros everyday than VTEC integras, no shitting. and this isn't in the BACKWOODS. this is the greater portland area. in the city
#49
Re:A little story...
Originally Posted by random-strike
z28 camaros have 320hp. STOCK with the engine that CAME IN THE CAR.
why not put a big block 502 in the z28 camaro and say its faster than a crx hf with any engine you want too put in it.
can't compare non stock cars to other stock cars rofl.
why not put a big block 502 in the z28 camaro and say its faster than a crx hf with any engine you want too put in it.
can't compare non stock cars to other stock cars rofl.
You very much CAN compare any two vehicles, stock vs non-stock, if they are lined up next to each other.
#50
Re:A little story...
pulling on stock ls1s?
probably true. with such a light car. but do you feel retarded putting all the work into your HF engine swap/turbocharger and barely pulling on a mild (stock) ls1 powered car. i know i will be disappointed when i do something racial EG turbocharged setup on my crx and i can't beat a very very mild ls1 and pretty heavy firebird?
i think we are going for the record of most posts on a thread.
probably true. with such a light car. but do you feel retarded putting all the work into your HF engine swap/turbocharger and barely pulling on a mild (stock) ls1 powered car. i know i will be disappointed when i do something racial EG turbocharged setup on my crx and i can't beat a very very mild ls1 and pretty heavy firebird?
i think we are going for the record of most posts on a thread.