Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
Originally Posted by ryan89crx
2.8 was the worst motor GM ever produced
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
The 2.8 arnt to bad only problem ive ever had was rod an main bearings. you can get a two piece intake then add a 450 cfm four barrle carb itll give it quite a bit more power. ive had five blazers an trucks with the 2.8 an one with the 2.4 four cyl. The automatic transmitions arnt the strongest but the 4 and 5 speeds are pretty good. they are even realy easy to swap in a v8 with only minor issues. Good luck
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
Originally Posted by ryan89crx
2.8 was the worst motor GM ever produced
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
Originally Posted by ryan89crx
2.8 was the worst motor GM ever produced
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
No, that award goes to the 3.4 liter DOHC that was based off the 2.8. It's like starting with a scoop of ---- and injection molding really cool bits to bolt to it... out of more ----. :3
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
What Mr Ass Dents is saying is that of the four revisions GM put out on how exactly you are supposed to change timing belts on a DOHC 3.4 V6, he happened upon the right one first time around AND got lucky.
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
haha, I suppose I did.
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
I have a 93 s-10 with the 2.8 v6. Its got 291,xxx+ miles on it and it still runs strong, cant complain here.
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
That's ------- amazing. I can't believe it's the original motor, though.
|
Re: Info on 2.8L V6 - chevy
Don't get anything with the 2.8. Trust me just be patient you'll wish you hadn't bought it.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands