General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

I-6 Vs. V-6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #1  
alpalwal's Avatar
Thread Starter
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,097
Default I-6 Vs. V-6

So, we were talking in auto class today about the benefits of inline vs. v engines and the consensus was that inline engines have more torque than v engines, but no one really had a good reason why. Does anyone know a good reason why the inline engines inherently have more torque than V?

Or if you disagree, throw that out there too.
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #2  
jinxy's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

i disagree, displacement cam profile and head design have more to do with torque. the benifits of inline versus the v are more for weight distribution and fitting a certain amount of cylinders into a set space
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #3  
Paperchase013's Avatar
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 908
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

i thought it would be the opposite... but now that i think about it most high tq diesel motors are inline.


Old Oct 13, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #4  
LSD Motorsports's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,898
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

Originally Posted by rawr
i disagree, displacement cam profile and head design have more to do with torque. the benifits of inline versus the v are more for weight distribution and fitting a certain amount of cylinders into a set space
Yea, Tq is not really a function of the cylinders being inline or in a v shape. Its just another way of designing things and as rawr mentioned above, the reasons for it. Just like with subaru boxer engines, they produce more power then lets say a 4 cyl turbo saab, but its not the reason they use a boxer engine, its for a lower center of gravity and thus better handling.
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 04:38 PM
  #5  
Dx 101's Avatar
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 888
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

i thought it was because of the air flow patern. like in a v6 you have so split the air over to smaller head right? but a i6 it just goes straight across the flat head. i dunno if this has anything to do with it but thats what i was thinkin. smoother air travle = more tq? dunno but makes sence in my head
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #6  
jinxy's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

Originally Posted by Dx 101
i thought it was because of the air flow patern. like in a v6 you have so split the air over to smaller head right? but a i6 it just goes straight across the flat head. i dunno if this has anything to do with it but thats what i was thinkin. smoother air travle = more tq? dunno but makes sence in my head
actualy, a better flow pattern will net you less torque. Wich is the reason for things like butterfly valves on h22's and other cars. the engine will be able to pull in to much air killing the velocity at wich air is travling into the cylinder.
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 06:06 PM
  #8  
baldur's Avatar
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,194
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

well you need to maintain velocity to get max torque. Too much flow and you'll lose torque.
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #9  
ryanlude's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

It's all about volumetric efficiency
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #10  
J-SMITH69's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: I-6 Vs. V-6

i guess i can chime in with what it thinks.

as someone stated, inline engines with their up and down piston motion tend to be smooth. and there is not as much force against the cylinder walls rotating.

a blanked statement saying inline engines have more torque than v engines is wrong i would say. its definatly a matter of what the engine was built for.

i also think inline engines due to their up and down design run better and smoother at low rpms. but im not too sure about that



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.