|
this is funny...
|
Re: this is funny...
thats like putting up a handicapped person against an olympic runner
i love 8 year olds on youtube and streetfire running there cocksuckers about how whicch cars suck and what cars better |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by buk9tp
thats like putting up a handicapped person against an olympic runner
i love 8 year olds on youtube and streetfire running there cocksuckers about how whicch cars suck and what cars better |
Re: this is funny...
Well yeah, that bike is fast as ----, but listen to the video where they were in the Z06 taking off. It sounded like he was just cruising, not racing. :l You can't tell me a Z06 bogs like that at WOT. :S
I hate the way they talk. :1 __________________ Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
Well yeah, that bike is fast as ----, but listen to the video where they were in the Z06 taking off. It sounded like he was just cruising, not racing. :l You can't tell me a Z06 bogs like that at WOT. :S
I hate the way they talk. :1 damn nippers |
Re: this is funny...
Anybody that tries to talk ---- about a Z06 should be drawn and quartered.
|
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by matalac
Anybody that tries to talk ---- about a Z06 should be drawn and quartered.
So is this show like the Japanese version of Top Gear? or whatever that brittish ---- was jonny? |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by buk9tp
thats like putting up a handicapped person against an olympic runner
i love terrorists with no car experience on youtube and streetfire and HMT running there cocksuckers about how whicch cars suck and what cars better |
Re: this is funny...
you cant compare a car and a bike and say the car sucks, but you can compare a car and a bike and say the bike sucks
|
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by 97EconoBox
Anybody that has made 6 post without an intro post with porn should be hanged. get a rope.
So is this show like the Japanese version of Top Gear? or whatever that brittish ---- was jonny? this is from best motoring. which makes all the jap cars win and the rest lose. we all know the show is a joke and entertainment only when a NSX beats a c6 z06 in a drag race... or in anything... they also put the s2k higher on a stupid chart i guess was supposed to show the best track car... ahead of a z06 LOL |
Re: this is funny...
well at least this show used a real Z06 and not the regular version like the Top Gear show did with the mustang.
|
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by 97EconoBox
well at least this show used a real Z06 and not the regular version like the Top Gear show did with the mustang.
|
Re: this is funny...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/show/powerlaps.shtml
theres only one maybe two mustangs on there, and neither are stockers. note the position of the evo in the chart. an evo is a milk/juice car... btw, you dont watch top gear to get a non biased opinion of cars, you watch it for the humour value. there is no denying that hes funny as ----. z06 is a cool car, i particularly like the rear suspension design and dry sump that it carrys, still, any half arsed stock honda has 1.5x better specific power than the ls7. though, it is ok for a pushrod engine. now that the japs have ditched their VOLUNTARY 280ps limit, look out for some monster cars. http://www.billzilla.org/2v4v.htm that page (the main car index, not that specifically) is loaded with good toyota and general info. i disagree with a few things on there, but hes a reasonable guy and happy to discuss your views on things. he drives 747s for a living. |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/show/powerlaps.shtml
theres only one maybe two mustangs on there, and neither are stockers. note the position of the evo in the chart. an evo is a milk/juice car... btw, you dont watch top gear to get a non biased opinion of cars, you watch it for the humour value. there is no denying that hes funny as ----. z06 is a cool car, i particularly like the rear suspension design and dry sump that it carrys, still, any half arsed stock honda has 1.5x better specific power than the ls7. though, it is ok for a pushrod engine. now that the japs have ditched their VOLUNTARY 280ps limit, look out for some monster cars. http://www.billzilla.org/2v4v.htm that page (the main car index, not that specifically) is loaded with good toyota and general info. i disagree with a few things on there, but hes a reasonable guy and happy to discuss your views on things. he drives 747s for a living. my lawnmotor has a better specific output than a c6 z06. does that make it a better engine? hows that torque on that 1.5l dumbass. c6 z06 = 3000lbs only a ricer loser about to get banned back to honda-tech would compared a 92 crank hp engine to a 505hp engine and say its better |
Re: this is funny...
hey ricer, which jap engine has 1000hp/l?
hmmmmmmmmmmm? i can name a few 500 cubic inch hemi big blocks that do. |
Re: this is funny...
|
Re: this is funny...
um yes ricer please answer me this, which other car in the world makes over 500hp and isn't subject to the "gas guzzler" tax
go |
Re: this is funny...
hey ricer, is there another engine in the world that can gain 100rwhp with bolt ons.
GO |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by random-strike
my lawnmotor has a better specific output than a c6 z06. does that make it a better engine?
|
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
no, that makes it two stroke ;-) much like a 1.3 rota box performs like a 2.6 piston engine...
|
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
no, that makes it two stroke ;-) much like a 1.3 rota box performs like a 2.6 piston engine...
..enter Frank any second. |
Re: this is funny...
that doesnt ever have to idle? and is cammed only to spin 12k rpm? etc. etc...
why get touchy and sensitive and sound as you lot frequently put it "butt hurt"? why not just accept that there is more than one way to skin a cat? i've never owned a honda, i've driven a few, i dont have a login on any honda website, i dont want one. just concede that the build on jap cars is of a higher quality, and that smaller engines can produce as much hp with equal reliability with boost (as this site is all about) and call it quits... good idea? i think so. you posted this link just as a teaser most likely... so i thought i'd give you what you want. do you realise that each time you bag non v8 setups that you bag 95% of the users on this site? do you care? your mates are all watching, finding it amusing that you are having a go at me. thats fair enough. i find it amusing too. meanwhile you keep saying that pushrods are the only way. well, theres some news for you, its not the ONLY way, its a viable and good alternative with many upsides. of course a rotary is not a two stroke, though it shares some features and behaviours... |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
that doesnt ever have to idle? and is cammed only to spin 12k rpm? etc. etc...
why get touchy and sensitive and sound as you lot frequently put it "butt hurt"? why not just accept that there is more than one way to skin a cat? i've never owned a honda, i've driven a few, i dont have a login on any honda website, i dont want one. just concede that the build on jap cars is of a higher quality, and that smaller engines can produce as much hp with equal reliability with boost (as this site is all about) and call it quits... good idea? i think so. you posted this link just as a teaser most likely... so i thought i'd give you what you want. do you realise that each time you bag non v8 setups that you bag 95% of the users on this site? do you care? your mates are all watching, finding it amusing that you are having a go at me. thats fair enough. i find it amusing too. meanwhile you keep saying that pushrods are the only way. well, theres some news for you, its not the ONLY way, its a viable and good alternative with many upsides. of course a rotary is not a two stroke, though it shares some features and behaviours... you're the one who comes in here like a queer ass faggot eurotrash homosexual and spouts off your normally cock filled mouth about how d15b motors are better than a ls7 because they make 90hp out of 1.5l and the ls7 "only" makes 505 out of 7 i have owned many hondas, and imports. turbocharged, swapped, and the like... reality is reality. no turbo honda at 505hp is going to be as reliable as a stock ls7 motor and anyone who says different is retarded at best. |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
of course a rotary is not a two stroke, though it shares some features and behaviours...
|
Re: this is funny...
my quad is a 4 poke and it makes 71hp/l
if i had a c6 z06 i would swap it in definatly. might even gain me a few points on the technology dyno |
Re: this is funny...
a turbo nsx at 12psi making 500 crank hp would be reliable IF it was built right. you can guarantee that. how about a toyotas, how about a 5l mill with no boost making 500hp, hows that? such an engine doesnt roll off the showroom floor (see 280hp limit) but it could be built from their v12 without too much hassle. its no big deal to make 100hp per litre. there is no excuse for GM if you ask me. the later ford V8s have 4 cams, and make more respectable numbers for their size, things are looking up for the american car makers credibility.
you speak of ls1s like they are infallible. in reality they are not, there were a LOT of warranty claims on engines in the commodores with ls1s in em. not up to the task when really held to it. have you got what ever it is thats on your mind out yet? 11 posts to my 3 before hitting the go button on this one. perhaps sit back and enjoy a beer instead of trying your hardest to have a heart attack... |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
a turbo nsx at 12psi making 500 crank hp would be reliable IF it was built right. you can guarantee that. how about a toyotas, how about a 5l mill with no boost making 500hp, hows that? such an engine doesnt roll off the showroom floor (see 280hp limit) but it could be built from their v12 without too much hassle. its no big deal to make 100hp per litre. there is no excuse for GM if you ask me. the later ford V8s have 4 cams, and make more respectable numbers for their size, things are looking up for the american car makers credibility.
you speak of ls1s like they are infallible. in reality they are not, there were a LOT of warranty claims on engines in the commodores with ls1s in em. not up to the task when really held to it. have you got what ever it is thats on your mind out yet? 11 posts to my 3 before hitting the go button on this one. perhaps sit back and enjoy a beer instead of trying your hardest to have a heart attack... i love the ricer ifs and coulds. will that 5l 500hp engine power the car its in to 30mpg? will it have 475ft-lbs of torque? the 4.6l engines (without the blower) in the mustangs are gigantic heaps of ---- compared to ls1s stock for stock and mod for mod. worse mileage, less torque, more weight, respond worse to mods, need i say more. the 4.6l mod motors are good motors, just not as a good as lsx motors. there are a lot of warranty claims on every car/motor ever made ahh yes the 280hp limit, the greatest ricer excuse of them all. ls1, ls2, ls3, ls6, ls7 > YOU :-* |
Re: this is funny...
|
Re: this is funny...
|
Re: this is funny...
|
Re: this is funny...
poor thing, one of the fastest if not the fastest supercars in the world. for 700k and uses a poor lonely pushrod motor :(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7pcbgbbQqo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOMHZ...elated&search= |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by random-strike
will that 5l 500hp engine power the car its in to 30mpg? will it have 475ft-lbs of torque?
the 4.6l engines (without the blower) in the mustangs are gigantic heaps of ---- compared to ls1s stock for stock and mod for mod. the 4.6l mod motors are good motors, just not as a good as lsx motors. and i dont even know what the 4.6 is. the engine i'm thinking of is the one in the late model falcons its called "the boss" i think, but dont quote me, its 5.0l its cast iron blocked though, so the balance of the car isnt as good as its gm counterpart... another 4 (edit 5) posts there. you dont think you could take a second to think before posting do you? |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
no, it will have about 500nm as 100nm per litre is around about what all engines make unless they are very ---- indeed.
and i dont even know what the 4.6 is. the engine i'm thinking of is the one in the late model falcons its called "the boss" i think, but dont quote me, its 5.0l its cast iron blocked though, so the balance of the car isnt as good as its gm counterpart... another 4 (edit 5) posts there. you dont think you could take a second to think before posting do you? |
Re: this is funny...
how about you tell us what it will get in miles per gallon.
i bet it does get the 26-30mpg the c6 z06 does ehh??? |
Re: this is funny...
post -----....
lol. |
Re: this is funny...
its hypothetical... but i'm sure it would manage if in the same light chassis.
|
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
its hypothetical... but i'm sure it would manage if in the same light chassis.
we're talking about real life. im sure you're a dumbass and thats not hypothetical |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by random-strike
why don't you try to come into reality.
i love the ricer ifs and coulds. will that 5l 500hp engine power the car its in to 30mpg? will it have 475ft-lbs of torque? the 4.6l engines (without the blower) in the mustangs are gigantic heaps of ---- compared to ls1s stock for stock and mod for mod. worse mileage, less torque, more weight, respond worse to mods, need i say more. the 4.6l mod motors are good motors, just not as a good as lsx motors. there are a lot of warranty claims on every car/motor ever made ahh yes the 280hp limit, the greatest ricer excuse of them all. ls1, ls2, ls3, ls6, ls7 > YOU :-* |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by 88dx
Johnny u really should work at a GM dealership too see how big of piles of ---- all GM ---- is :8
compared to what cars that cost 20k more? |
Re: this is funny...
From my experiences vehicle weight is the biggest contributor to shitty gas mileage. For instance, my dad's i4 Sonoma got the same mileage as his magnum v8 Dakota when the Sonoma was loaded and the Dakota was empty. I'm talking 2-3 AC compressors on the Sonoma + misc tools and ----. The total weights were comparable, yet the Sonoma with its underpowered engine had to have tons of the throttle to keep going on the highway. Unloaded the Sonoma was great, but loaded it sucked balls, like the magnum v8.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands