|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
its like talking to a brick wall. ok one more time... i agree with you that the b16 is a great motor. but what i laugh at is how important power per liter is to you. come to think of it. the power/ltr on the 3.2 bmw is about the same as the b16. "ONE HUNDRED HORSEPOWER PER LITER" soooo. to hell with the BMW motors. you cant except the fact that its a better motor. so ill give you the benifet of the doubt again and stay with 4 cylinders.....and ill even stay with honda for you. if you really want to talk about power/ltr. unless somethings changed. the AP2 s2k's have teh most NA hp/ltr at 240hp on a 2.2ltr. that 120 if your still counting. of course. the enzo ferrari also has the same exact ratio. but it has 3x's the displacement. so. let me guess. "---- dat. tha b16 is still tha best eva" again though, how am i owned. i love to see low ltr hondas beat up on the big $$$ cars. im happy for them. but that race and any other sort of racing has absolutly nothing to do with pwr/ltr. and wait a second. how is it that you owned me when the crx didnt have a b16 in it. hmmmm from what ive heard lately the b16 is a better motor. now why in the world would he put a BIGGER motor in there. oh wait i know. CAUSE IT HAS MORE POWER!!! i guess i can act like a 13 yr old too......OWNED |
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
um thats in europe, that crx has a stock b16 with i/h/e it sounds to me, he might have done a swpa but who cares. this arguement is ------- homo
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
b16 owns ill take a 5 thousand dollar car and put a 2k turbo kit on it and walk over e46 m3's all day long, ---- ls teggy would do the job as well, then ima spend my other 10 grand i just saved and buy something nice 8) the only thing i give bmw over honda is the fact that they are pretty safe cars, id rather get in a wreck in my friends m3 then my crx anyday, ---- i might as well take my doors off so i dont get metal jammed into me, thats prob part of the reason they weight alot more.
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by mycrx
considering the nsx engine was the first in the us and hasnt been changed much since ------- 91, id say i hope a 06 bmw engine would be better, as for my friends 97 m3 the nsx would own it, it is not fast at all, im guessing mid 14's maybe it is the 3.2l im comparing everything too because i havent ridden in a newer m3 let alone care too, nsx owns that kraut ---- anyway, keep to your opinion and ill keep to mine, HONDA ENGINEERING FTW!
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
car was badass
honda/bmw argument is gay. The beemer is balla |
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
chea, that last race, was pretty close, then i saw the times, i was like OOOHHHHH!!! :6
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by bigmul
it is not realy fair to compare the us spec 97 m3 as it is way down on power to the euro spec m3!
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
all noobs should be perma-banned when they bring up threads more than a month old. especially with nothing ------- important to say.
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
that e30 is a complete waste anyone that's driven that car knows it's borderline perfect, maybe a short shifter and some harder bushings |
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by BirdmanMD
all noobs should be perma-banned when they bring up threads more than a month old. especially with nothing ------- important to say.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands