Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by mycrx
yea and a nsx would own a pos bmw, and yes i know that, they were also the first doch vtec engines for hondas in the us?? or so ive heard.
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by mycrx
they were also the first doch vtec engines for hondas in the us?? or so ive heard.
Originally Posted by mycrx
yea mother fucker and if honda made a 3.2l dohc vtec same size as my friends m3 engine, it would absolutly rape the pile of ----.
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
---- vanos bullshit i could care less about someone trying to copy vtec, a 3.2L dohc vtec engine would own a 3.2l bmw hands down.
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
OOOOOOK....well here we go.....heres your 3.2l dohc vtec motor from a 1997 nsx
http://members.lycos.nl/hendrik/nsx/specs.htm#nsx1990 Engine manufacturer Honda Engine Position M Engine alignment T Bore 93 mm Stroke 78 mm Cylinders 6-V Valve Gear DOHC Valves per Cylinder 4 (24 in total) Swept Volume 3179 cc Main crankshaft bearings 0 Coolant W Compression Ratio 10.2 Fuel System Ho PGM fuel inj. Maximum power 290 bhp (216 kW) Power Peak 7100 rpm Maximum Torque 304 nm (224 lb/ft, 31 kgm) Torque Peak 5500 rpm and heres the 1999 Zanardi special edition nsx. just for your benifit. Drivertrain: mid- engine, rear wheel drive Engine: 3.2 liter, V-6 Horsepower: 290 bhp @ 7100 rpms Torque: 224 lbs/feet @ 5500 rpms now....heres your 3.2l BMW motor http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2006/...x.html?vehicle[1].year=2004&vehicle[1].make=Acura&vehicle[1].model=NSX&vehicle[1].trim=1;2;5;14&vehicle[2].year=2006&vehicle[2].make=Mercedes-Benz&vehicle[2].model=SLK-Class&vehicle[2].trim=1154;33;5;14&vehicle[3].year=2007&vehicle[3].make=Mercedes-Benz&vehicle[3].model=SLK-Class&vehicle[3].trim=1154;33;5;14&vehicle.fullTrimId= 2006 BMW M3 Base Coupe Performance & Efficiency Standard Features - 3,246 cc 3.2 liters in-line 6 front engine with 87 mm bore, 91 mm stroke, 11.5 compression ratio, double overhead cam, variable valve timing/camshaft and four valves per cylinder - Premium unleaded fuel 91 - Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 24 and EPA city (mpg): 16 - Multi-point injection fuel system - 16.6 gallon main premium unleaded fuel tank - Power: 248 kW , 333 HP SAE @ 7,900 rpm; 262 ft lb , 355 Nm @ 4,900 rpm so. honda has made a 3.2 liter dohc vtec motor. but BMW's 3.2l VANOS motor pwnes it. btw.....learn something about cars other than honda. they didnt just copy vtec. the improved it. continuous variable valve timing > set RPM switch valve timing |
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
one more thing. some people may bitch about the bmw having 11.5 to 1 compression. might say its cheating compared to the 10.2 to 1 on the nsx. guess what. you can boost that biotch no problem. heres one more thing honda motors dont have.....direct port injection...no not NAWSSS. fuel injectors right into the cylinder heads. allows you to have astronomically high compression ratio and still handle boost w/o detonation.
people like you are the reason everyone else looks down upon the honda "community". even people that dont give a ---- about cars think that we're jokes. learn something else. yea hondas are great. i love mine and the one i sold. but damn, know your place in the car world. we're already at the bottom, just above a geo. we dont need you to bring us down |
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
things change in the 9 year time span your dumbass is comparing motors too.
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
honestly i could car ------- less, ive been in my friends stock si coupe sc61 status on 9psi, thing ------- rapped my friends m3, just walked on it like it wasnt even ------- moving, civic had 276whp. bmw got owned, even a new one would get owned and thats froma wha wha whaaat? 1.6L 4 banger :8
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by mycrx
things change in the 9 year time span your dumbass is comparing motors too.
|
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
Originally Posted by mycrx
things change in the 9 year time span your dumbass is comparing motors too.
Originally Posted by mycrx
honestly i could car ------- less, ive been in my friends stock si coupe sc61 status on 9psi, thing ------- rapped my friends m3, just walked on it like it wasnt even ------- moving, civic had 276whp. bmw got owned, even a new one would get owned and thats froma wha wha whaaat? 1.6L 4 banger :8
and when it comes to power/weight between say the 2002 nsx with the SAME 3.2l at 290hp. the weight is at 3153 which equals out to 10.8 lb/hp...not bad and how does the bmw e46 M3 stack up to it. lets see..again the 3.2l BMW motor has 333hp. the weight is at 3415 which equals out to 10.2 lb/hp....YOU LOSE AGAIN EDIT: sorry not much of a morning person. thanks rawr for fixing my mistake |
Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands