950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

http://www.dpccars.com/car-videos/01...BMW-E30-M3.htm
just thought it was badass, its kind old but i never saw it on here

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

repost or not... it was nice...

good find

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

That thing sounds angry... but I prefer the sound of this beast better....


http://videos.streetfire.net/hottest...8ef911e61e.htm

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

splooge.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

I want to get an older BMW and build the ---- out of the motor and run mad boost. Those things are so light.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

:o

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

Yeah, that was bad-ass :y



drool

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

I loved the sound of that E30 but what the hell was with that Audi once it spooled up that ---- hurt my eyes. It was like going into warp speed or some ----. Then those gay ass euro still shots. :S

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

the two chicks in the begining of the audi vid were hot... and the car was cool to :l

the BMW was kick ass i like how it beat the american muscle, with slicks on.... :S

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

kicked that stupid domestics ass

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

Yeah, that ---- was like something straight out of Star Trek.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

Wait I mean to say ears...not eyes. lol. That ---- was soo loud I my eyes were hurtin'. Hahahahah :P Now that's boost for yah.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

---- bmw's all those owners think they are the ----, nothing but 3x bigger then a honda motor and still cant produce the hp per liter a b16 pulls, get fucked krouts :1

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

hp per liter means absolutly nothing. so a b16 makes more power per liter. oh ------- well. guess what. its still got another liter+ on a b16. and its much more luxurious then any honda that youd want to throw a b16 into.

hp per liter is the most riciest(if thats even a word) comment ive ever heard...

"guess what...my car has 100hp per liter!!!!!!!"
"nice, well how big is your motor"
"its only .5 liter but its the fastest thing on the earth"

dumbass>u

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

yea mother fucker and if honda made a 3.2l dohc vtec same size as my friends m3 engine, it would absolutly rape the pile of ----.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

Holy ------- ---- you're dumber than a rock :o

Honda DOES make a 3.2l DOHC Vtec engine you half wit >:D Ever hear of the NSX? the TL even comes with a 3.2, I think its SOHC vtec though.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

104 Horsepower per liter if i'm not mistaken ;D

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

yea and a nsx would own a pos bmw, and yes i know that, they were also the first doch vtec engines for hondas in the us?? or so ive heard.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

hahahha
"Yea, and Grizzly Adams had a beard!"
"Grizzly Adams DID have a beard."

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

bmws= Big Money Waste, or Big Mexican Wagon

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

True. NSX in 91 and Integra in 92.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

holy ----. you actually made a correct statement....well. actually you still didnt know that for your self(aka researched). your just spitting out info that youve been told. now what if that person told you something wrong. then you would look like an even bigger douchewaffle

what if what if....it either is or it isnt. and you cant really compare a v6 and a i6. completely different motors...btw.. have you ever hear of Vanos....research that

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

---- vanos bullshit i could care less about someone trying to copy vtec, a 3.2L dohc vtec engine would own a 3.2l bmw hands down.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

OOOOOOK....well here we go.....heres your 3.2l dohc vtec motor from a 1997 nsx
http://members.lycos.nl/hendrik/nsx/specs.htm#nsx1990
Engine manufacturer Honda
Engine Position M
Engine alignment T
Bore 93 mm
Stroke 78 mm
Cylinders 6-V
Valve Gear DOHC
Valves per Cylinder 4 (24 in total)
Swept Volume 3179 cc
Main crankshaft bearings 0
Coolant W
Compression Ratio 10.2
Fuel System Ho PGM fuel inj.
Maximum power 290 bhp (216 kW)
Power Peak 7100 rpm
Maximum Torque 304 nm (224 lb/ft, 31 kgm)
Torque Peak 5500 rpm

and heres the 1999 Zanardi special edition nsx. just for your benifit.

Drivertrain: mid- engine, rear wheel drive Engine: 3.2 liter, V-6
Horsepower: 290 bhp @ 7100 rpms Torque: 224 lbs/feet @ 5500 rpms

now....heres your 3.2l BMW motor

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2006/...x.html?vehicle[1].year=2004&vehicle[1].make=Acura&vehicle[1].model=NSX&vehicle[1].trim=1;2;5;14&vehicle[2].year=2006&vehicle[2].make=Mercedes-Benz&vehicle[2].model=SLK-Class&vehicle[2].trim=1154;33;5;14&vehicle[3].year=2007&vehicle[3].make=Mercedes-Benz&vehicle[3].model=SLK-Class&vehicle[3].trim=1154;33;5;14&vehicle.fullTrimId=
2006 BMW M3 Base Coupe Performance & Efficiency Standard Features
- 3,246 cc 3.2 liters in-line 6 front engine with 87 mm bore, 91 mm stroke, 11.5 compression ratio, double overhead cam, variable valve timing/camshaft and four valves per cylinder
- Premium unleaded fuel 91
- Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 24 and EPA city (mpg): 16
- Multi-point injection fuel system
- 16.6 gallon main premium unleaded fuel tank
- Power: 248 kW , 333 HP SAE @ 7,900 rpm; 262 ft lb , 355 Nm @ 4,900 rpm

so. honda has made a 3.2 liter dohc vtec motor. but BMW's 3.2l VANOS motor pwnes it.



btw.....learn something about cars other than honda. they didnt just copy vtec. the improved it. continuous variable valve timing > set RPM switch valve timing

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

one more thing. some people may bitch about the bmw having 11.5 to 1 compression. might say its cheating compared to the 10.2 to 1 on the nsx. guess what. you can boost that biotch no problem. heres one more thing honda motors dont have.....direct port injection...no not NAWSSS. fuel injectors right into the cylinder heads. allows you to have astronomically high compression ratio and still handle boost w/o detonation.

people like you are the reason everyone else looks down upon the honda "community". even people that dont give a ---- about cars think that we're jokes. learn something else. yea hondas are great. i love mine and the one i sold. but damn, know your place in the car world. we're already at the bottom, just above a geo. we dont need you to bring us down

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

things change in the 9 year time span your dumbass is comparing motors too.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

honestly i could car ------- less, ive been in my friends stock si coupe sc61 status on 9psi, thing ------- rapped my friends m3, just walked on it like it wasnt even ------- moving, civic had 276whp. bmw got owned, even a new one would get owned and thats froma wha wha whaaat? 1.6L 4 banger :8

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

nsx engines havent ------ changed at all. so that argument is out the window...

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

im sorry. evidently honda thought the 3.2l motor was trash and decided to go to the 3.0l motor with less power. this is just one more excuse for you being retarded. just admit it

see. all you are seeing is that a small displacement car beat a slightly larger displacement car. therefore your dumbass is attempting to put 2 and 2 together....unfortunatly your coming up with 3 instead of 4. what im saying is that you seeing 1.6l beat 3.xl (depending on what year M3 it is), and you think, "hey that civic won cause he had more power per liter!" wrong. the civic ways a ---- ton less than the m3. thats called POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO. thats what wins races.

and when it comes to power/weight between say the 2002 nsx with the SAME 3.2l at 290hp. the weight is at 3153 which equals out to 10.8 lb/hp...not bad
and how does the bmw e46 M3 stack up to it. lets see..again the 3.2l BMW motor has 333hp. the weight is at 3415 which equals out to 10.2 lb/hp....YOU LOSE AGAIN



EDIT: sorry not much of a morning person. thanks rawr for fixing my mistake

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

this should piss you off.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYC86KjR_Zc

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

10.2 hp per pound on a 3415 lb vehicle is 34,833 hp :P

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

built race motors vs stock car arguements are not valid arguements when determining the quality of one motor over the other.

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

why would that piss me off. i cant watch the video. shitty connection on shitty computer. but like rawr said. are those cars stock for stock. or what. dont get me wrong. i love the underdog. anytime you can get a lower displacement car to beat a bigger one, much respect. but we were talking motors straight from the factory.......

next

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

how the fucks a built race motor a stock d or b with a turbo kit, wow a sc61 on 9psi blow me, leeds crx stock would own this and look at pats d :1 just ------ sick, that bimmer doesnt have ---- on a total of about a 5k car :-* 4 cylinders at that, ---- my friends e30 dinan prob wouldnt even beat it, its very fun to drive and it handles good but nothing like a b16 turbo jus ------- waaaaaaaaa baaa baaaaaaa buurrrrr waaaaa baaaa baaaa, and its on9 psi its also hella "clean" looking and would prob handle a wreck better then any honda :1 e30 m3's own, i have some pics from some on a spokane drive if u ------s like that ----, and yes it was a bmw drive and i went haha :8


http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e1...n3Turbo002.jpg
http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e1...oadside032.jpg
* Custom tuned Dinan Turbo
* 9-10Psi
* Ported and polished head
* 3" Custom downpipe
* 3" full cat-less exhaust system
* Dinan E36 M3 Exhaust Custom Fitted

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

if you actually compare car for car litre per litre the nsx in 97 was better than a m3, of course if you compare a 97 to a 06 (9 yearsnewer) obviously the bmw will look better but , if you compare a 01 nsx


2001 Acura NSX V6 4.5 12.9 (C&D TV 2001)
2002 BMW M3 4.7 13.4


hrmm 12.9 1/4 mile for the nsx
and a 13.4 for the m3



price for power, ---- bliing bling faggot ---- 01 nsx > 02 m3 not only is it faster, it does look better and it handles better :-*

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

that video was gay. i can make a video of me in my car getting wooped by a merto and name the title swift beats type arrrr mad type jdm integra and call it a day

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

i agree. the nsx was faster than that. but that wasnt our argument. he said that if honda made a 3.2ltr dohc vtec motor. it would blow away bmw's 3.2ltr motor. i was simply correcting his lack of research. my argument was simple, BMW's 3.2l motor is far better engineered than any 3.2l motor honda has come out with. just because honda has not improved on it is ~10years doesnt mean i cant still compare it to BMW's current 3.2. i was also calling him out for saying BMW's Vanos system is just a copycat of vtec. the Vanos system far more advanced, with 3 different valve timing settings(low, mid and high rpm). honda needs to refine the vtec motors to still be competitive. mitsu has from what im understanding the same system as vtec. im waiting for a company to finally come out with continuous variable valve timing. think of the tuning abilities...the ability to exactly adjust valve timing along the entire rpm range

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

considering the nsx engine was the first in the us and hasnt been changed much since ------- 91, id say i hope a 06 bmw engine would be better, as for my friends 97 m3 the nsx would own it, it is not fast at all, im guessing mid 14's maybe it is the 3.2l im comparing everything too because i havent ridden in a newer m3 let alone care too, nsx owns that kraut ---- anyway, keep to your opinion and ill keep to mine, HONDA ENGINEERING FTW!

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

+1

Re: 950 hp m3 ... repost maybe?
 

Nice video. On the honda engineering ftw, their street car stuff is decent, but in the high end technology powertrain/drivetrain wise, they are way behind, even in the NSX stuff. Don't really see Honda's competing too well in the higher level motorsports. And if you think Honda has motor technology superior to BMW, then why can the S54 motor take boost at 11.5:1 CR and the Type R motors have major issues with anything over 10psi on a half decent turbo? Honda's fuel system technology is years behind BMW's.