315's anyone?
01-15-2008, 10:02 PM
#131
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,935
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by QikEnuF
More factors than just horsepower and rwd/fwd involved in that. And not just weight either. Properly set up 600whp fwd is going to rape stock suspension f body. And by stock I mean factory, not the stock style suspension guys.
01-15-2008, 10:05 PM
#132
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,313
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by scottsi
Perfectly setup vs perfectly setup RWD will win time and time again its been proven. Properly setup RWD comes out of the hole like a beast, but if both cars were making 600hp the fwd would probably beat it from a roll.
one, gets 1.65 60ft and is 2200lbs
one is 3200lbs gets 1.45 60ft and gets driven by at 880ft
01-15-2008, 10:18 PM
#134
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,313
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by scottsi
1.45 is crap, try low mid 1.3x. Through a crazy stall'd automatic, own fwd on the track and street.
so stock suspension my FASTEST to date 60ft is 1.59
so 1.35
1.59 see you at the 1000
01-15-2008, 10:21 PM
#135
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,313
Re: 315's anyone?
lol this is pointless. What times do you see with 600hp 3200lb cars? I havn't brushed up on it lately. But i rarely see 1.3x 60's with stalled/transbrake 3200lb cars.
My buddy and I are working on his mustang. 4k stall /w transbrake and 600whp on this setup, going for 1000 on the built motor. I'd love to see that thing turn 1.3x 60's on 10" rubber
boosted 351w ftw!
My buddy and I are working on his mustang. 4k stall /w transbrake and 600whp on this setup, going for 1000 on the built motor. I'd love to see that thing turn 1.3x 60's on 10" rubber
boosted 351w ftw!
01-15-2008, 11:11 PM
#136
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,935
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by Random Hero
sounds to me like now the budget just went up 2k.
so stock suspension my FASTEST to date 60ft is 1.59
so 1.35
1.59 see you at the 1000
so stock suspension my FASTEST to date 60ft is 1.59
so 1.35
1.59 see you at the 1000
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...spension+stock
Originally Posted by Random Hero
lol this is pointless. What times do you see with 600hp 3200lb cars? I havn't brushed up on it lately. But i rarely see 1.3x 60's with stalled/transbrake 3200lb cars.
My buddy and I are working on his mustang. 4k stall /w transbrake and 600whp on this setup, going for 1000 on the built motor. I'd love to see that thing turn 1.3x 60's on 10" rubber
boosted 351w ftw!
My buddy and I are working on his mustang. 4k stall /w transbrake and 600whp on this setup, going for 1000 on the built motor. I'd love to see that thing turn 1.3x 60's on 10" rubber
boosted 351w ftw!
01-15-2008, 11:16 PM
#137
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,313
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by scottsi
try a 1.26 60ft running a 7 sec 1/4. FWD can match that? yeah righttt :1
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...spension+stock
You arent on ls1 tech enough, plenty of cam'd nitrous stock heads autos running 10s, theyre about to break into 9's and cutting a 1.45 is a bad 60ft for them
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...spension+stock
You arent on ls1 tech enough, plenty of cam'd nitrous stock heads autos running 10s, theyre about to break into 9's and cutting a 1.45 is a bad 60ft for them
Plenty and a few are totally different terms BTW because there is only a few on there.
01-15-2008, 11:24 PM
#138
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by Random Hero
Lol i'm never on ls1 tech.. Nice comparison. that car was a just a bit over 600hp. But i see the point of stock suspension. I never said that FWD was better. Just saying power to wieght ratio owns. Personally, I'd rather be able to walk liter bikes on the freeway then run low 10's high 9's. You'd need close to 1000whp to do that.
Plenty and a few are totally different terms BTW because there is only a few on there.
Plenty and a few are totally different terms BTW because there is only a few on there.
and 1000rwhp viper walks a turbo hayabusa.
01-15-2008, 11:44 PM
#139
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,935
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by Random Hero
Lol i'm never on ls1 tech.. Nice comparison. that car was a just a bit over 600hp. But i see the point of stock suspension. I never said that FWD was better. Just saying power to wieght ratio owns. Personally, I'd rather be able to walk liter bikes on the freeway then run low 10's high 9's. You'd need close to 1000whp to do that.
Plenty and a few are totally different terms BTW because there is only a few on there.
Plenty and a few are totally different terms BTW because there is only a few on there.
01-16-2008, 12:02 AM
#140
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,313
Re: 315's anyone?
Originally Posted by scottsi
Yeah, maybe not 1000hp but i see your point. FWD is great to a certain point, then it becomes diminishing returns. Id say FWD is faster in the beginning (lower hp) and as the figures get higher RWD begins to win.
