Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2007, 11:58 AM
  #11  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

I agree that the 1.8 is a good engine that even has some small advantages over the 4g63, and is an excellent motor to boost. Its just that few even try.

The statement about the 4g63 being a piece couldnt be farther from the truth. The 4g63 is a gem and on a shitty tune can crack 400hp anyday of the week and still take a beating. Ive owned and built more dsm's than most on this board. The PROBLEM with dsm's isnt the engine, its everything ATTACHED to it!

Both the 4g63 and the 1.8 suffer from mitsu's poor choice to drop them in a heavy *** ------- chassis. Thats most of the dsm's problems right there.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 12:08 PM
  #12  
1.0 BAR
 
T0DA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 315
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Andrew's 4g63 will solve that problem. (Into the late 80's supercar chassis)
Going to be sick if/when it runs.
T0DA is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 01:44 PM
  #13  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by T0DA
Andrew's 4g63 will solve that problem. (Into the late 80's supercar chassis)
Going to be sick if/when it runs.
Andrew has oil pan clearance issues as of the moment. From what I saw very little will be able to compete with that car.

Which is why I have to get movin on my crx, since I see him, steve jones and wes being the only folks who will be able to keep up with me lol.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 01:50 PM
  #14  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
Andrew has oil pan clearance issues as of the moment. From what I saw very little will be able to compete with that car.

Which is why I have to get movin on my crx, since I see him, steve jones and wes being the only folks who will be able to keep up with me lol.

that sucks he just keeps having bad luck with anything he trys to do with that car
bitchasscracker is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 02:15 PM
  #15  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Its an awsome concept, take everything good about a dsm and put it in a crx. Even if it ends up weighing 2500lbs. (which is probably pretty close) it will still be nasty. He's really just doing it because its what he wants, not to be the fastest. Which I can respect.
Hitchhikkr is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 02:25 PM
  #16  
1.0 BAR
 
T0DA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 315
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

I still wanna see that car, are there pics on the interweb anywhere?
T0DA is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 02:59 PM
  #17  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
Its an awsome concept, take everything good about a dsm and put it in a crx. Even if it ends up weighing 2500lbs. (which is probably pretty close) it will still be nasty. He's really just doing it because its what he wants, not to be the fastest. Which I can respect.

original+turbo=------- sweet
bitchasscracker is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:04 PM
  #18  
0.5 BAR
 
P90Puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 61
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Are you guys ------- serious?

1.8L SOHC POS Motor is better then the 4G63. :1

Wow.
P90Puma is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:13 PM
  #19  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by P90Puma
Are you guys ------- serious?

1.8L SOHC POS Motor is better then the 4G63. :1

Wow.

dont you dress in drag and drive a miata around town ?? no one cares what you say or think
bitchasscracker is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:52 PM
  #20  
3.0 BAR
 
Hitchhikkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?

Originally Posted by P90Puma
Are you guys ------- serious?

1.8L SOHC POS Motor is better then the 4G63. :1

Wow.
You fail at basic reading comprehension. Nobody said the engine was better than the 4g, just not the gm-like feces that was suggested.

Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
I agree that the 1.8 is a good engine that even has some small advantages over the 4g63, and is an excellent motor to boost. Its just that few even try.
One of those small advantages you failed to ask an explaination for was the fact that the 1.8 is cheap and fits easily into a late 80's mirage/colt/summit, which is mistus equal to the ED/EF hatch if you will, with little to no modification, which in full trim soaking wet weighs an incredible 2200lbs. and usually costs less than your average insurance premium.

Also many of those on this particular board will find an 80's hatch far less homosexual than a miata of equal value.

Pot, kettle, black.
Hitchhikkr is offline  


Quick Reply: Turbo 1.8 Eclipse?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.