Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

04-13-2008, 10:34 AM

#51

screamingdsm

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 17

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

Very sweet project. Nothing better then doing it yourself!

04-13-2008, 03:00 PM

#52

karter74

0.5 BAR

Join Date: Jul 2007

Posts: 55

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

Looks great, work loooks awesome!

04-17-2008, 11:28 AM

#53

Aaron Cake

0.0 BAR

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 39

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

Quote:

Originally Posted by KGParts

so true.
i was a liitle surprised to see you on here Aaron. welcome... i hadnt noticed ANY political BS on the club... I will have to look a little closer. LOL

It's mainly only a few long-time members who think they should be treated differently stirring things up. Most regular users can easily ignore it but as a moderator it means that I must pay attention. Not a big deal really, but can be annoying at times.

04-19-2008, 08:18 AM

#54

cabel

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 2

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

wow damm nice bro...

04-19-2008, 02:44 PM

#55

fe3tcourier

1.5 BAR

Join Date: Jul 2007

Posts: 752

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

9.4:1 explains the lowish specific power output I guess. You are running it on pump gas right?

04-21-2008, 12:17 PM

#56

Aaron Cake

0.0 BAR

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 39

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

Low power output? I've never seen anyone make this much power on a 13B with a GT40R at such low boost. Most who are running 15 PSI are making between 370 and 380 RWHP. I'm currently running 13 PSI and put down 387 RWHP.

04-21-2008, 03:14 PM

#57

b18.

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 0

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aaron Cake

What dyno?

04-21-2008, 03:35 PM

#58

Aaron Cake

0.0 BAR

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 39

Re: Some Pics Of My RX-7 Project

Dynocom.

Yes, I'm aware that the reading of a dyno is easily manipulated. I don't remember what correction factor we were running but it was far less aggressive then most.