Re: smoke from valve cover
What the hell are you talking about? Was that an anti-DSM statement or something?
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
more of an anti 4g37. haha. no. we gotta keep dsm around, they make good turbos.
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
Originally Posted by clipser
more of an anti 4g37. haha. no. we gotta keep dsm around, they make good turbos.
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
word
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
so completly take off the stock pcv valve junk?
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
you should build a catch can of some sort...its nice to have a little bit of vacuum on the crankcase
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
it's actually really good to have a free breathing crankcase, that allows the pistons to reciporcate without the atmosphere putting restrictions on the movement, especially in a boosted engine.
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
Originally Posted by xstreetfiendx
it's actually really good to have a free breathing crankcase, that allows the pistons to reciporcate without the atmosphere putting restrictions on the movement, especially in a boosted engine.
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
Why did you make two topic of about the same ----????
|
Re: smoke from valve cover
Right now I have the combination pre turbo and IM setup with one way valves. It seems like it be better than the atmopshere route because its actually creating vaccum for the crankcase...helping vent out the pressure better. ???
sound right or does it even matter with the atmospheric vent for positive pressure in the crankcase |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands