Quigley owner needs MORE MPG!!! help
so, I have a 2000 chevy express Quigley (4x4) van with a 454 in it. Im tired of getting 8-11 mpg in it as I plan on traveling quite a bit in the next few years. will a turbo or twin turbos with a tune help in mpg? this van weighs 7000lbs empty and on our trip to Cali it weighed 9500lbs!
turbos only generate boost dependent on engine load. more engine load=more duration in boost= more fuel you will use. high grade octane fuel will need to be used so fuel cost will also rise.
a 454 is a massive engine. there is no way around its horrible fuel consumption. 8-11 mpg is pretty good for such a massive engine.
the only thing i can think of is a conversion.
you can convert it to a small block chevy and then turbo charge the small block. this will allow for better cruising(low load) fuel economy as boost is not needed but when a high load is needed you will have the extra power.
or
you can do a duramax diesel conversion. even better fuel economy but very expensive.
a 454 is a massive engine. there is no way around its horrible fuel consumption. 8-11 mpg is pretty good for such a massive engine.
the only thing i can think of is a conversion.
you can convert it to a small block chevy and then turbo charge the small block. this will allow for better cruising(low load) fuel economy as boost is not needed but when a high load is needed you will have the extra power.
or
you can do a duramax diesel conversion. even better fuel economy but very expensive.
A turbo isn't likely to add efficiency on its own, but a turbo on a smaller engine could potentially get better mileage with the same amount of power. Would swapping in a 4.8 LSx be an option? 
I suspect you could gain more mpg from weight reduction and an aerodynamic cover over the top rack. Having the cargo just stacked up there is costing you a significant chunk of horsepower pushing it through the air. And recently I sold a set of '90 Suburban brake rotors to a recycler - they weight over 70 pounds! I've got to wonder if some aftermarket discs could shave a significant chunk off unsprung weight if it was running aluminum hubs and rear drums. Not sure if there's a source for such things though.

I suspect you could gain more mpg from weight reduction and an aerodynamic cover over the top rack. Having the cargo just stacked up there is costing you a significant chunk of horsepower pushing it through the air. And recently I sold a set of '90 Suburban brake rotors to a recycler - they weight over 70 pounds! I've got to wonder if some aftermarket discs could shave a significant chunk off unsprung weight if it was running aluminum hubs and rear drums. Not sure if there's a source for such things though.
this pic is from our trip to Cali where it weighed in at 9500lbs.. it gets basically the same mileage either way...8-11 depending on the wind and what fuel I use. the further west the less ethanol in the fuel.
thanx for all the thoughts. I will look into changing some things. I just wish it had a diesel in it already. my next one will have one.
thanx for all the thoughts. I will look into changing some things. I just wish it had a diesel in it already. my next one will have one.
this pic is from our trip to Cali where it weighed in at 9500lbs.. it gets basically the same mileage either way...8-11 depending on the wind and what fuel I use. the further west the less ethanol in the fuel.
thanx for all the thoughts. I will look into changing some things. I just wish it had a diesel in it already. my next one will have one.
thanx for all the thoughts. I will look into changing some things. I just wish it had a diesel in it already. my next one will have one.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




